Determination of Celestial Body Principal Axes via Gravity Field Estimation

2017 ◽  
Vol 40 (12) ◽  
pp. 3050-3060
Author(s):  
Yu Takahashi ◽  
Nicholas Bradley ◽  
Brian Kennedy
2021 ◽  
Vol 366 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Wutong Gao ◽  
Jianguo Yan ◽  
Weitong Jin ◽  
Chen Yang ◽  
Linzhi Meng ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 95 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Sánchez ◽  
Jonas Ågren ◽  
Jianliang Huang ◽  
Yan Ming Wang ◽  
Jaakko Mäkinen ◽  
...  

AbstractIn 2015, the International Association of Geodesy defined the International Height Reference System (IHRS) as the conventional gravity field-related global height system. The IHRS is a geopotential reference system co-rotating with the Earth. Coordinates of points or objects close to or on the Earth’s surface are given by geopotential numbersC(P) referring to an equipotential surface defined by the conventional valueW0 = 62,636,853.4 m2 s−2, and geocentric Cartesian coordinatesXreferring to the International Terrestrial Reference System (ITRS). Current efforts concentrate on an accurate, consistent, and well-defined realisation of the IHRS to provide an international standard for the precise determination of physical coordinates worldwide. Accordingly, this study focuses on the strategy for the realisation of the IHRS; i.e. the establishment of the International Height Reference Frame (IHRF). Four main aspects are considered: (1) methods for the determination of IHRF physical coordinates; (2) standards and conventions needed to ensure consistency between the definition and the realisation of the reference system; (3) criteria for the IHRF reference network design and station selection; and (4) operational infrastructure to guarantee a reliable and long-term sustainability of the IHRF. A highlight of this work is the evaluation of different approaches for the determination and accuracy assessment of IHRF coordinates based on the existing resources, namely (1) global gravity models of high resolution, (2) precise regional gravity field modelling, and (3) vertical datum unification of the local height systems into the IHRF. After a detailed discussion of the advantages, current limitations, and possibilities of improvement in the coordinate determination using these options, we define a strategy for the establishment of the IHRF including data requirements, a set of minimum standards/conventions for the determination of potential coordinates, a first IHRF reference network configuration, and a proposal to create a component of the International Gravity Field Service (IGFS) dedicated to the maintenance and servicing of the IHRS/IHRF.


1967 ◽  
Vol 20 (03) ◽  
pp. 281-285
Author(s):  
H. C. Freiesleben

It has recently been suggested that 24-hour satellites might be used as navigational aids. To what category of position determination aids should these be assigned ? Is a satellite of this kind as it were a landmark, because, at least in theory, it remains fixed over the same point on the Earth's surface, in which case it should be classified under land-based navigation aids ? Is it a celestial body, although only one tenth as far from the Earth as the Moon ? If so, it is an astronomical navigation aid. Or is it a radio aid ? After all, its use for position determination depends on radio waves. In this paper I shall favour this last view. For automation is most feasible when an object of observation can be manipulated. This is easiest with radio aids, but it is, of course, impossible with natural stars.At present artificial satellites have the advantage over all other radio aids of world-wide coverage.


2011 ◽  
Vol 85 (8) ◽  
pp. 487-504 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Goossens ◽  
K. Matsumoto ◽  
D. D. Rowlands ◽  
F. G. Lemoine ◽  
H. Noda ◽  
...  

2000 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 595-601 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jin Young Kim ◽  
Young Sung Ghim ◽  
Yong Pyo Kim ◽  
Donald Dabdub
Keyword(s):  

Geophysics ◽  
1964 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 445-446 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen Thyssen‐Bornemisza

Inherent uncertainties of conventionally determined Bouguer‐density values may seriously affect the more sophisticated interpretation of gravity field results, predominantly in areas of irregular surface lithology. To minimize the consequences of such “incorrect” density values geophysicists have introduced and suggested corrective procedures (Nettleton, 1939; Vajk, 1956; Grant and El Saharty, 1962; Thyssen‐Bornemisza and Stackler, 1962; Hammer, 1963).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document