Boundary Layer Combustion for Skin Friction Drag Reduction in Scramjet Combustors

Author(s):  
Ryan J. Clark ◽  
Shiva Om Bade Shrestha
Author(s):  
Hidetoshi Iijima ◽  
Hidemi Takahashi ◽  
Seigo Koga ◽  
Monami Sasamori ◽  
Yoshimi Iijima ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 138 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc Perlin ◽  
David R. Dowling ◽  
Steven L. Ceccio

A variety of skin-friction drag reduction (FDR) methods for turbulent boundary layer (TBL) flows are reviewed. Both passive and active methods of drag reduction are discussed, along with a review of the fundamental processes responsible for friction drag and FDR. Particular emphasis is given to methods that are applicable to external hydrodynamic flows where additives are diluted by boundary layer entrainment. The methods reviewed include those based on engineered surfaces (riblets, large eddy breakup devices (LEBUs), and superhydrophobic surfaces (SHS)), those based on additives (polymer injection and gas injection), and those based on morphological alterations in the boundary layer flow (air layers and partial cavity formation). A common theme for all methods is their disruption of one or more of the underlying physical processes responsible for the production of skin-friction drag in a TBL. Opportunities and challenges for practical implementation of FDR techniques are also discussed.


2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Md Abdur Razzak ◽  
Yong Dong Cui ◽  
Jonathan Tay ◽  
Zhen Wei Teo ◽  
Thirukumaran Nadesan ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Shuai Wang ◽  
Guoqiang He ◽  
Fei Qin

In order to investigate the applicability of the skin-friction reduction technique using hydrogen injecting into turbulent boundary layer, three-dimensional numerical simulation was carried out for a constant-cross-confined-space with rearward facing steps. The flow characteristics near wall surface and development of wall shear stress were analyzed and compared under different coming flow and injection conditions. The simulation results show that the hydrogen injection can achieve around 13.5% skin-friction drag reduction under the coming flow Mach number of 2.3Ma or 2.8Ma. At 2.8Ma, the optimal reduction profit is 13.5% which is obtained when the equivalent ratio is 0.06. The gases mixings are gradually enhanced along the flow path. At the positions of shock wave-boundary-layer interactions, the mixings are first strengthened and then suppressed, and meanwhile, the wall shear stress and density changes with similar law that first decreases and then rebounds at the positions. The declines of skin-friction drag decrease along the flow direction, the best reduction area can profit nearly 60%.


2011 ◽  
Vol 318 (3) ◽  
pp. 032008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jens H M Fransson ◽  
Alessandro Talamelli

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document