Ignition delay times of methane fuels at thrust chamber conditions in an ultra-high-pressure shock tube

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Pierro ◽  
Andrew Laich ◽  
Justin J. Urso ◽  
Cory Kinney ◽  
Subith Vasu ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 3695-3703 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.R. De Toni ◽  
M. Werler ◽  
R.M. Hartmann ◽  
L.R. Cancino ◽  
R. Schießl ◽  
...  

1995 ◽  
Vol 418 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. O. Foelsche ◽  
M. J. Spalding ◽  
R. L. Burton ◽  
H. Krier

AbstractBoron ignition delay times for 24 μm diameter particles have been measured behind the reflected shock at a shock tube endwall in reduced oxygen atmospheres and in a combustion bomb at higher pressures in the products of a hydrogen/oxygen/nitrogen reaction. The shock tube study independently varies temperature (1400 – 3200 K), pressure (8.5, 34 atm), and ignition-enhancer additives (water vapor, fluorine compounds). A combustion chamber is used at a peak pressure of 157 atm and temperature in excess of 2800 K to study ignition delays at higher pressures than are possible in the shock tube.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudio Marcio Santana ◽  
Jose Eduardo Mautone Barros

The shock tube is a metal tube that the gas at low pressure and high pressure are separated by a diaphragm. When the diaphragm (make of material copper and aluminum) breaks on predetermined conditions (high pressure in this case) produces shock waves that move from the high-pressure chamber (known the compression chamber or Driver section) for low pressure chamber (known the expansion chamber or Driven section). The objective of this work is the correlate the ignition delay times of convectional Diesel and Biodiesel from soybean oil measured in a shock tube. The results were correlated with the cetane number of respective fuels and compared with the ignition delay times of Diesel and Biodiesel with cetane numbers of known. The ignition delay time of biodiesel from soybean oil was approximately three times greater than the ignition delay time of convectional Diesel. The contribution of this work is that it shows why pure biodiesel should not be used as substitutes for Diesel compression ignition engines without any major changes in the engines.


2009 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 477-484 ◽  
Author(s):  
D.R. Haylett ◽  
P.P. Lappas ◽  
D.F. Davidson ◽  
R.K. Hanson

2016 ◽  
Vol 164 ◽  
pp. 152-163 ◽  
Author(s):  
Batikan Koroglu ◽  
Owen M. Pryor ◽  
Joseph Lopez ◽  
Leigh Nash ◽  
Subith S. Vasu

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document