Waste Disposal Into the Deep Underground - Technical And Economical Considerations For Applications Outside The Oil Industry

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco Sanfilippo ◽  
Maurice B. Dusseault ◽  
Frederic J. Santarelli
Author(s):  
Hans Tammemagi

Most of the solid waste generated by society ultimately winds up in near-surface landfills. Let us put our thinking caps firmly on, place our prejudices aside, and explore what other methods might be used to dispose of waste. We should seek, in particular, the approaches that best fulfill the three basic principles described in chapter 2. That is, we should strive to find disposal methods that are in accord with sustainable development. Existing and abandoned pits, quarries, and mines are attractive for waste disposal because a hole to contain the wastes has already been excavated. Such abandoned areas, when left unreclaimed, cannot be used for agriculture or other beneficial uses. Thus, they generally do not have significant market value and can often be obtained relatively cheaply. For these reasons, pits and quarries have been extensively used for landfills. Operating and abandoned mines, on which this section focuses, are somewhat similar to pits and quarries, though usually larger. Abandoned mines hold promise as disposal facilities because they are resource areas that have been depleted and thus have little future value. There are two basic types of mine: the open pit mine, which is effectively a large pit or hole in the ground; and the underground mine, where the mined-out openings are deep underground and there is no surface expression except for the shafts used to gain subsurface access. Because underground mines occupy minimal surface land, their use for waste disposal would be in accordance with the sustainable development principles that were advocated in chapter 2. Several European countries, with higher population densities and much smaller land mass than in North America, have long used abandoned underground mines to dispose of their rubbish. The major advantage of placing wastes deep in underground mines is that it is inherently safer than placing the wastes in a surface facility. The amount of groundwater and its flow rate decrease with depth; this fact, combined with the long transport paths back to the biosphere, minimizes the possibility that contaminants will be carried by groundwater to the surface, where they could damage the environment. The waste is contained deeper and more securely.


2003 ◽  
Vol 807 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lars Werme ◽  
Fraser King ◽  
Lasse Ahonen ◽  
Claes Taxén ◽  
Ulla Vuorinen

ABSTRACTIn 1978, the Swedish Corrosion Institute published a report describing an assessment of the long-term corrosion behaviour of copper canisters for nuclear waste disposal. They concluded that the canisters would remain intact for a period exceeding 100,000 years in a deep underground repository in the Fennoscandian bedrock. In the intervening 25 years a great deal has been learnt about the corrosion of copper in the expected repository environment. In 2001, SKB and Posiva reviewed this new information and re-assessed the predicted canister lifetime [1]. It was concluded that the original prediction made in 1978 of canister lifetimes exceeding 100,000 years remains valid.


2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara Unda ◽  
Horacio Tovalin ◽  
Marlene Rodriguez ◽  
Jose Antonio Centeno

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document