scholarly journals Resinas bulkfill: propriedades e aplicabilidades

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. e6128
Author(s):  
Giovanna Garcia Monteiro ◽  
Jenniffer Shayane de Melo Oliveira ◽  
Maria Iohanna Brasil Bessa ◽  
Zildenilson da Silva Sousa ◽  
Iana Sá de Oliveira Fontenelle ◽  
...  

As resinas compostas (RCs) são materiais amplamente utilizados na odontologia como método restaurador. Apesar disso, sua capacidade de espessura possui fatores limitantes que interferem em uma melhora nos resultados. Assim, as RCs bulkfill (RCB) surgem com a possibilidade de incrementos únicos em processos restauradores. O objetivo deste trabalho é revisar a literatura acerca do que se sabe até o atual contexto sobre esse material restaurador, evidenciando a aplicabilidade clínica da RCB, além de suas propriedades como implemento eficaz na odontologia restauradora. Utilizou-se dos descritores em saúde: composite resins, polymerization, operative dentistry, clinical evaluation e chemistry aplicados nas bases de dados PubMed e Science Direct, na língua inglesa e interligados entre si pelo operador booleano “AND”. Dos 143 estudos encontrados, 133 foram excluídos por apresentarem um ou mais critérios de exclusão, sendo incluídos 10 estudos nesta revisão. As RCB através de suas propriedades químicas permitem uma maior rapidez em tratamentos clínicos, diminuindo complexibilidades técnicas nos procedimentos profissionais, além de capacidade de incremento mais vantajosa que as RCs convencionais. Contudo, mais estudos com períodos de avaliação mais extensos se fazem necessários antes de uma recomendação definitiva de mudanças de protocolos clínicos.

1998 ◽  
Vol 56 (2) ◽  
pp. 70-75 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carl Gösta Rasmusson ◽  
Birgitta Köhler ◽  
Per ödman

2002 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 79-83 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Lopes ◽  
D. Cefaly ◽  
E. Franco ◽  
R. Mondelli ◽  
J. Lauris ◽  
...  

1992 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 246-251 ◽  
Author(s):  
R.J. Smales ◽  
D.C. Gerke

2008 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 26-33 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ranuifo Gianordoli Neto ◽  
Sérgio Lima Santiago ◽  
Juliano Sartori Mendonça ◽  
Vanara Florëncio Passos ◽  
José Roberto Pereira Lauris ◽  
...  

Abstract Aim The aim of this study was to assess the clinical performance of two adhesive restorative systems (Single Bond/Filtek P-60 and Single Bond/Filtek Z-250) in posterior teeth using a modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) system. Methods and Materials A total of 70 restorations were placed in molars and premolars in 30 patients (14 females and 16 males; 18-40 years) by one operator. All restorations were directly evaluated by two examiners at baseline, six months, and 12 months using the following modified USPHS rating criteria: marginal integrity, marginal discoloration, surface texture, contour, postoperative sensitivity, and recurrent caries. Results At six and 12 months all restorations were available for evaluation of marginal discoloration, surface texture, contour, postoperative sensitivity, and recurrent caries that remained with 100% Alpha-ratings at recalls for both restorative systems. Marginal integrity for P-60 was scored as 94.3% and 91.4% Alpha at six and 12 months, respectively, and rates for Z-250 were 100% and 97.1% Alpha at six and 12 months, respectively. Statistical analysis was completed with Fisher's exact and McNemar Chi-square tests at a significance level of 5% (P<0.05). Conclusion All restorations were clinically satisfactory and no significant differences were found among them. Clinical Significance Posterior resin composite restorations placed under appropriate conditions provide a satisfactory clinical performance. Citation Gianordoli Neto R, Santiago SL, Mendonça JS, Passos VF, Lauris RP, Navarro MFdeL. One Year Clinical Evaluation of Two Different Types of Composite Resins in Posterior Teeth. J Contemp Dent Pract 2008 May; (9)4:026-033.


1989 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 147-153 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. J. Tyas ◽  
V. T. Truong ◽  
M. Goldman ◽  
D. R. Beech

2001 ◽  
Vol os8 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ailbhe McDonald

The rapid developments in biomaterials has led not only to improved materials but also to the development of clinical techniques made possible by these advances. Adhesive dentistry remains one of the fastest changing fields and this will most likely continue well into the next decade. Patients’ aesthetic awareness and, to some extent, concern about amalgam has produced a growing demand for posterior tooth-coloured restorations. Originally this was met by ceramo-metal crowns and subsequently by the development of posterior composite resins. Recent development of stronger ceramics and better luting have now made all-ceramic restorations possible in posterior sites. Several new techniques for cavity preparation are emerging as alternatives to the conventional handpiece while the quest for amalgam alternatives continues. As with all recent developments there are, by definition, few long-term clinical data yet available to allow a comprehensive evaluation of the relevant materials and techniques. This paper is a summary of the most significant recent advances in fixed prosthodontics and operative dentistry.


1989 ◽  
Vol 62 (6) ◽  
pp. 627-632 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hideaki Shintani ◽  
Naoki Satou ◽  
Junko Satou

2015 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 25
Author(s):  
Fátima Cristina Sá ◽  
Ticiane Cestari Fagundes ◽  
Wagner Baseggio ◽  
Eduardo Bresciani ◽  
Terezinha Jesus Esteves Barata ◽  
...  

<p><strong>Objective</strong>: The aim of this study was to evaluate the nine-year clinical performance of Class III composite restorations using two microhybrid anterior composite resins [Magic™-Vigodent/(F) and Z100™-3M ESPE/(Z)]. <strong>Material</strong> <strong>and</strong> M<strong>ethods</strong>: The study was a randomized controlled trial, following the split mouth design. Seventy restorations were placed, thirty-five for each resin composite into 35 patients. The restorations were placed by one operator according to the manufacturers’ specifications. Two independent evaluators conducted the clinical evaluation using modified USPHS criteria. After nine-years, 56 restorations (28F-28Z) were evaluated. Data were analyzed using Chi-square, Exact Fisher and McNemar tests (p&lt;0.05). <strong>Results</strong>: No postoperative sensitivity, secondary caries and loss of anatomic form was observed after nine-years for both composites. There were no significant differences between the two composites tested at baseline and after nine-years. Significant differences for Z and F restorations between baseline and nine-year with respect to color matching and for F regarding the marginal integrity were detected. <strong>Conclusion</strong>: The clinical performance of both materials was considered acceptable after the 9-year evaluation.</p>


2003 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 123-128 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. G. Lopes ◽  
D. F. G. Cefaly ◽  
E. B. Franco ◽  
R. F. L. Mondelli ◽  
J. R. P. Lauris ◽  
...  

1975 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 407-416 ◽  
Author(s):  
K.F. Leinfelder ◽  
T.B. Sluder ◽  
C.L. Sockwell ◽  
W.D. Strickland ◽  
J.T. Wall

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document