Clinical evaluation of two posterior composite resins retained with bonding agents

1989 ◽  
Vol 62 (6) ◽  
pp. 627-632 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hideaki Shintani ◽  
Naoki Satou ◽  
Junko Satou
1998 ◽  
Vol 56 (2) ◽  
pp. 70-75 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carl Gösta Rasmusson ◽  
Birgitta Köhler ◽  
Per ödman

2012 ◽  
Vol 06 (02) ◽  
pp. 115-122 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bengi Oztas ◽  
Sebnem Kursun ◽  
Gul Dinc ◽  
Kıvanc Kamburoglu

ABSTRACTObjective: The purpose of this in vitro study was to explore the radiopacity of composite resins and bonding materials using film and phosphor plates.Methods: Nine composite dental resin specimens and human tooth slices were exposed together with an aluminium stepwedge using dental film and phosphor plates. Eight dentin bonding specimens were prepared and exposed in a similar manner. Their radiopacity on film was assessed using a transmission densitometer, and the radiopacity with phosphor plates was assessed digitally using the system’s own software (Digora). Data were analysed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post-hoc Tukey tests (P<.05). Film and phosphor plate radiopacity values were compared using simple regression analysisResults: Excellent linear correlation was found between film and phosphor plates for both composite resins and bonding agents. The composite materials Spectrum Tph and Natural Look exhibited the highest radiopacity with film and with phosphor plates, respectively. All the dentin bonding agents tested exhibited lower radiopacity than dentin. Conclusion: Synergy, Ice, Filtek Silorane, Filtek Z250, Clearfil Majesty Posterior, Herculite Classic, Spectrum Tph, and Natural Look composite materials exhibited greater radiopacity than dentin, and all the dentin bonding agents tested exhibited lower radiopacity than either enamel or dentin. (Eur J Dent 2012;6:115-122)


2002 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 79-83 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Lopes ◽  
D. Cefaly ◽  
E. Franco ◽  
R. Mondelli ◽  
J. Lauris ◽  
...  

1992 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 246-251 ◽  
Author(s):  
R.J. Smales ◽  
D.C. Gerke

2017 ◽  
Vol 54 (3) ◽  
pp. 574-577 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simona Stoleriu ◽  
Sorin Andrian ◽  
Irina Nica ◽  
Andrei Victor Sandu ◽  
Galina Pancu ◽  
...  

The aims of the study were to characterise the resin-resin interface when a universal bonding agent (UBA) was used in two different strategies in direct composite repair and to evaluate the bonding capacity of UBA by microleakage assessment. In study groups a micro-filled hybrid and a nano-filled hybrid composite resins were aged in order to simulate an old restorations. As a repair material was chosen the same micro-filled hybrid composite resin that was used as an old restoration. UBA was applied in etch-and-rinse and self-etch strategies and was used as an intermediate layer in repair procedure. After the repair the samples were aged again. In control groups were included non-aged, repaired composite resins samples. The resin-resin interface was characterised on SEM images and the microleakage at the interface was evaluated by dye penetration assessment. Universal bonding agent used in direct composite resins repair showed a very good adaptation to non-aged micro-filled hybrid and nano-filled hybrid composite resins. Aging by saliva storage of repaired composite resins leaded to an enlargement of resin-resin junction and a increased microleakage irrespective of the strategy (etch-and-rinse or self -etch) used for bonding agent application. Etch-and-rinse strategy for universal bonging agent application determined a better interface bonding when compared to self -etch strategy.


2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 368-376
Author(s):  
S Malhotra ◽  
R Kaur ◽  
AK Jossan ◽  
KK Bhullar ◽  
A Handa

Bonding agents play a crucial role in the effective sealing and retention of resin-based composite restorations, which have been increasingly placed and replaced by dentists in many countries around the world. In fact, direct adhesive restoration with composite resins has become the procedure of choice for the treatment of anterior and posterior teeth. However, long-term durability of those restorations may be compromised due to progressive loss of the integrity of adhesive interfaces. This means that no adhesive strategy is free from technique sensitivity. The specificity and proportion of different constitutive molecules, the interaction between them and substrates can differ greatly from one class of adhesive system to another, which can affect bond quality. Protocol simplification has been an inevitable trend that has boosted the use of self-etching and universal systems in adhesive dentistry.


2008 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 26-33 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ranuifo Gianordoli Neto ◽  
Sérgio Lima Santiago ◽  
Juliano Sartori Mendonça ◽  
Vanara Florëncio Passos ◽  
José Roberto Pereira Lauris ◽  
...  

Abstract Aim The aim of this study was to assess the clinical performance of two adhesive restorative systems (Single Bond/Filtek P-60 and Single Bond/Filtek Z-250) in posterior teeth using a modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) system. Methods and Materials A total of 70 restorations were placed in molars and premolars in 30 patients (14 females and 16 males; 18-40 years) by one operator. All restorations were directly evaluated by two examiners at baseline, six months, and 12 months using the following modified USPHS rating criteria: marginal integrity, marginal discoloration, surface texture, contour, postoperative sensitivity, and recurrent caries. Results At six and 12 months all restorations were available for evaluation of marginal discoloration, surface texture, contour, postoperative sensitivity, and recurrent caries that remained with 100% Alpha-ratings at recalls for both restorative systems. Marginal integrity for P-60 was scored as 94.3% and 91.4% Alpha at six and 12 months, respectively, and rates for Z-250 were 100% and 97.1% Alpha at six and 12 months, respectively. Statistical analysis was completed with Fisher's exact and McNemar Chi-square tests at a significance level of 5% (P<0.05). Conclusion All restorations were clinically satisfactory and no significant differences were found among them. Clinical Significance Posterior resin composite restorations placed under appropriate conditions provide a satisfactory clinical performance. Citation Gianordoli Neto R, Santiago SL, Mendonça JS, Passos VF, Lauris RP, Navarro MFdeL. One Year Clinical Evaluation of Two Different Types of Composite Resins in Posterior Teeth. J Contemp Dent Pract 2008 May; (9)4:026-033.


1989 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 147-153 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. J. Tyas ◽  
V. T. Truong ◽  
M. Goldman ◽  
D. R. Beech

2013 ◽  
Vol 32 (5) ◽  
pp. 709-717 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyunghwan KIM ◽  
Kyung Mi SON ◽  
Ji Hyun KWON ◽  
Bum-Soon LIM ◽  
Hyeong-Cheol YANG

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document