Error types in external quality assessment schemes and corrective actions to improve laboratory performance

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cleo Keppens
Keyword(s):  
Quality Assessment ◽  
External Quality Assessment ◽  
External Quality ◽  
Laboratory Performance ◽  
Corrective Actions ◽  
Error Types

Combined international external quality assessment results of medical laboratory performance and reporting of samples with known antimicrobial resistance

Diagnosis ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 161-166
Author(s):  
Michael A. Noble ◽  
Robert Rennie
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Resistance ◽  
Quality Assessment ◽  
Clinical Laboratory ◽  
External Quality Assessment ◽  
Medical Laboratory ◽  
External Quality ◽  
Laboratory Performance ◽  
Reporting Practices ◽  
Medical Laboratories ◽  
Poor Treatment

Abstract Background Reporting on the presence of antimicrobial resistance is of considerable concern both for individual patient care and for understanding the underlying health status within the community at large. Antimicrobial resistance is solely dependent upon clinical laboratory detection and thus can be impacted upon by the quality and competence of medical laboratories. Proficiency testing or external quality assessment (PT/EQA) is the international standard for the direct measurement of medical laboratory performance on critical testing. Methods An international, intercontinental collaborative retrospective study of medical laboratory performance in antibiotic resistance was performed by the Microbiology Working Group (MWG) of the European Organisation for External Quality Assurance for Laboratory Medicine (EQALM) with particular examination of laboratory performance on the testing and reporting of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE). Results The results of 1880 medical laboratories were compiled. Strictly accurate reporting of isolates as resistant occurred with MRSA 96.9%, with VRE 91.3% and with CRE 93.1% of the time. On the other hand, very major errors (reporting of false susceptibility) were observed with 2.2% of MRSA and 2.4% of VRE and 0.8% of CRE. Major errors (false resistance) were reported for vancomycin susceptibility testing for MRSA at a rate of 0.6%. Conclusions Depending on how clinical physicians read and understand microbiology susceptibility reports, proficient acceptable results were reported either between 91% and 94% of the time, or between 97% and 100%. While very major errors are infrequently reported, they were found in all regions and could potentially cause poor treatment decisions by clinicians. A collective analysis of multi-program PT/EQA information can provide valuable insights into the testing and reporting practices of medical laboratories.

External quality assessment of laboratory performance in analysis of toxicological cases

2001 ◽  
Vol 121 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 27-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.F. Wilson ◽  
P.A. Toseland ◽  
N.E. Capps ◽  
L.N. Sandle ◽  
B.L. Smith ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Assessment ◽  
External Quality Assessment ◽  
External Quality ◽  
Laboratory Performance

Department of pathology and laboratory medicine at Jigme Dorji Wangchuck National Referral Hospital striving for quality: external quality assessment scheme in hematology

2016 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-10
Author(s):  
Kuenzang Dorji ◽  
Rixin Jamtsho ◽  
Puja D. Samal ◽  
Partab Rai ◽  
Dorji Wangchuk
Keyword(s):  
Quality Assessment ◽  
External Quality Assessment ◽  
Internal Quality ◽  
External Quality ◽  
External Quality Assessment Scheme ◽  
Gradual Improvement ◽  
Laboratory Services ◽  
Effective System ◽  
Corrective Actions

Introduction: Quality Assurance comprising External Quality Assessment Scheme (EQAS) and Internal Quality Control (IQC) is an indispensible part of the laboratory analytical process to ensure reliable results from the laboratories. However, due to various challenges in many developing countries such as limitations in resources and manpower, EQAS samples are often given less importance at laboratories. The objective of this study is to assess performance on hematology EQAS samples received from Pacific Paramedical Training Center- External Quality Assesment Scheme (PPTC-EQAS) and International External Quality Assesment Scheme-United Kingdom (IEQAS-UK)since 2007 and 2008 respectively. The findings from this study will be helpful to establish an effective system to ensure timely follow up and corrective actions to improve the quality of laboratory services. Methods:The feedback of the EQAS results submitted thrice a year to the PPTC-EQAS and six times a year to the IEQAS-UK since 2007 and 2008 respectively were reviewed to assess the laboratory’s performance and to determine the effectiveness of EQAS participation for improving the performance of laboratory hematology in Bhutan. Results:For PPTC-EQAS, the average yearly scores were 69.00%, 75.00%, 87.66%, 87.50%, 70.00%, 80.33%, 80.50%, 85.00% for the years 2007-2014. For IEQAS-UK, the average yearly scores were 76.66%, 75.95%, 77.91%, 85.83%, 92.50%, 63.88% and 98.14% for the years 2008-2014. Our results show inconsistent performances on both EQAS samples despite gradual improvement over the last seven years. Conclusions:We conclude that, strengthening the system for regular follow up and implementing corrective actions for the outlying results in addition to replacement of the equipment could improve the trend and ensure consistency of the performance.

scholarly journals Comparison of Procedures for Evaluating Laboratory Performance in External Quality Assessment Schemes for Lead in Blood and Aluminum in Serum Demonstrates the Need for Common Quality Specifications

2002 ◽  
Vol 48 (11) ◽  
pp. 2000-2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Taylor ◽  
Jurgen Angerer ◽  
Francoise Claeys ◽  
Jesper Kristiansen ◽  
Olav Mazarrasa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Assessment ◽  
External Quality Assessment ◽  
Total Error ◽  
Blood Lead ◽  
External Quality ◽  
Target Concentration ◽  
Laboratory Performance ◽  
Environmental Laboratory ◽  
Z Scores ◽  
Quality Specifications

Abstract Background: The different scoring methods used by eight European External Quality Assessment Schemes (EQASs) for occupational and environmental laboratory medicine were compared to develop suitable quality specifications as a step toward harmonization. Methods: Real results for blood lead and serum aluminum assays, reported by participants in Italian and United Kingdom EQASs, were evaluated according to individual scheme scoring criteria. The same results were then used to produce z scores using scheme-based between-laboratory SDs as the estimate of variability to determine whether simple performance-derived quality specifications produced better agreement among schemes. Results: The schemes gave conflicting assessments of participants’ performance, and participants judged to be successful by one scheme could be defined as performing inadequately by another. An approach proposed by Kenny et al. (Scand J Clin Lab Invest 1999;59:585), which uses clinical inputs to set targets for analytical imprecision, bias, and total error allowable, was then used to elaborate quality specifications. Conclusions: We suggest that the CLIA ′88 recommendations for blood lead (± 40 μg/L or ± 10% of the target concentration, whichever is the greater) could be used as a quality specification, although a revision to ± 30 μg/L or ± 10% is recommended. For serum aluminum, a suitable quality specification of ± 5 μg/L or ± 20% of the target concentration, whichever is the greater, is suggested. These specifications may be used to compare laboratory performance across schemes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document