Improved pregnancy rates following endometrial receptivity analysis and personalized embryo transfer in patients with previous failed implantation after euploid embryo transfer

Author(s):  
Diana Valbuena Perilla ◽  
Alyssa Snider ◽  
Gary Harton ◽  
Carlos Simon Valles
2020 ◽  
Vol 113 (5) ◽  
pp. 990-995 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eran Zilberberg ◽  
Ramsey Smith ◽  
Dan Nayot ◽  
Jigal Haas ◽  
James Meriano ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 107 (3) ◽  
pp. e34
Author(s):  
L.A. Kaye ◽  
M.C. Antero ◽  
A.F. Bartolucci ◽  
L. Engmann ◽  
C.A. Benadiva ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Yuta Kasahara ◽  
Tomoko Hashimoto ◽  
Ryo Yokomizo ◽  
Yuya Takeshige ◽  
Koki Yoshinaga ◽  
...  

Background:The clinical value of personalized embryo transfer (pET) guided by the endometrial receptivity analysis (ERA) tests for recurrent implantation failure (RIF) cases is still unclear. The aim of this study is to clarify the efficacy of ERA leading to personalization of the day of embryo transfer (ET) in RIF patients. Methods: A retrospective study was performed for 94 patients with RIF who underwent ERA between July 2015 and December 2019. Pregnancy outcomes in a previous vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer (previous VBT) and a personalized vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer (pVBT) in identical patients were compared. The details of each pVBT were further analyzed between patients in a non-displaced group, which indicated “receptive” cases in ERA results and those who were in the displaced group, which indicated “non-receptive” cases. Results:When the pregnancy rate, both per patient and per transfer cycle, of previous VBT and pVBT were compared, a significant increase in pVBT was observed between the two methods (5.3% vs. 62.8%, 4.4% vs. 47.9%, respectively). The pregnancy rates, implantation rates, and clinical pregnancy rates of the first pVBT were significantly higher in the displaced group than the non-displaced group. The cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate of the displaced group tended to be higher compared to that of the non-displaced group in the first pVBT, although the difference was not statistically significant (51.0% vs. 31.1%, [Formula: see text] = 0.06). Conclusions:Our study demonstrates that pVBT guided by ERA tests may improve pregnancy outcomes in RIF patients whose window of implantation (WOI) is displaced, and its effect may be more pronounced at the first pVBT. The displacement of WOI may be considered to be one of the causes of RIF, and its adjustment may contribute to the improvement of pregnancy outcomes in RIF patients.


2015 ◽  
Vol 104 (3) ◽  
pp. e94
Author(s):  
O. Barash ◽  
K. Ivani ◽  
S. Willman ◽  
L. Weckstein ◽  
E. Rosenbluth ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 112 (3) ◽  
pp. e169
Author(s):  
Carrie Riestenberg ◽  
Seyedeh Nahaleh Salvatian ◽  
Haley Baltimore ◽  
Molly M. Quinn ◽  
Alin Lina Akopians ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 92 (3) ◽  
pp. S246-S247
Author(s):  
A.A. Shitta-Bey ◽  
G. Kovalevsky ◽  
S.M. Carney ◽  
M.P. Portman ◽  
L.S. Morrison ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 83 (2) ◽  
pp. 316-320 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hans G.I. van Weering ◽  
Roel Schats ◽  
Joseph McDonnell ◽  
Peter G.A. Hompes

2000 ◽  
Vol 74 (3) ◽  
pp. S206-S207 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Kreiner ◽  
J. Moschella ◽  
N. Carlson ◽  
J. Jelicks ◽  
M. Bolkas ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document