Pregnancy Rates of a Two Step Ultrasound Guided Embryo Transfer 1–112 cm from the Top of the Uterine Cavity

2000 ◽  
Vol 74 (3) ◽  
pp. S206-S207 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Kreiner ◽  
J. Moschella ◽  
N. Carlson ◽  
J. Jelicks ◽  
M. Bolkas ◽  
...  
KnE Medicine ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hilma Putri Lubis

<p><strong>Introduction</strong><strong></strong></p><p>A trial or mock embryo transfer (ET) may influence pregnancy rates and it performed prior to ET allows the clinician to assess the uterine cavity and the utero-cervical angle. The aim of this study is to compare the consistency of the type of ET in mock ET with real ET.</p><p><strong>Material &amp; Methods</strong></p><p>A retrospective comparative analysis of  patients who underwent in vitro fertilization or ICSI cycle from January 2014 to December 2014 in Halim Fertility Center was done. The type of transfer was divided into two groups: ‘easy’ or ‘difficult’. An easy ET was defined as a transfer that occurred without the use of manipulation or other instrumentation and difficult ET was considered when additional instrumentation was required.</p><p><strong>Results</strong></p><p>From the study, 103 patients who underwent Mock-ET, we  found 58 patients (56.3%) with easy ET and 45 patients (43.7%) with difficult ET, which with hard catheter ET in 17 patients (16.5%), with osfander assistance in 20 patients (19.4%) and with stylet in 8 patients (7,8%). 58 patients with Easy Mock ET group were entirely easy real ET (100%) and 45 patients with difficult Mock ET group also entirely were difficult real ET (100%). The Statistical analysis shows no significant difference between the mock ET and real ET groups (p&gt;0,05). In easy real ET, clinical pregnancy rates were 32.8% and in difficult real ET, clinical pregnancy rates were 26.7% with no significant difference between the  groups (p&gt;0,05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion:</strong></p><p>Mock ET prior to the treatment cycle is consistent with real ET.</p>


2002 ◽  
Vol 78 ◽  
pp. S231 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandro Fasciani ◽  
Thomas Gordon Hannam ◽  
Antonella Di Berardino ◽  
Barbara Cruickshank ◽  
Robert F Casper ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Małgorzata Kozikowska ◽  
Mirosław Grusza ◽  
Grzegorz Mrugacz ◽  
Cezary Grygoruk

Embryo transfer (ET) has been recognized as a vital step which influences pregnancy rates in patients undergoing the in vitro fertilization process (IVF). The safe placement of embryos inside the uterine cavity is essential to obtain an optimal pregnancy rate. However, there is no guarantee that the embryos will remain in the uterine cavity after the procedure. Embryos have been found in catheters, on the cervix, and on the vaginal speculum. The performance of an atraumatic ET is essential to IVF success. The other factor influencing ET are contamination of the catheter with blood, mucus or endometrial tissue, as well as the occurrence of retained embryos. Embryo retention in the catheter is a common phenomenon, encountered by even the most experienced operators. Embryo retained in the transfer catheter or its sleeve require repeat transfer. Pregnancy rates after IVF-ET decrease in a stepwise fashion with the increasing frequency of uterine contractions. To achieve state of maximal uterus relaxation during embryo transfer it is advised to perform ET gently without excessive stimulation of the cervix. Despite revolutionary changes in the embryological laboratory, little has changed with process of ET over past 20 years. Even thought, ET seems to be relatively easy procedure it should be performed by the most experienced operators.


2001 ◽  
Vol 76 (3) ◽  
pp. S251
Author(s):  
M. Sasy ◽  
G. Abdo ◽  
T. Abozaid ◽  
H. Salem ◽  
M. Ashraf ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document