OCCUPATIONAL RIDE COMFORT OF TRACTOR DRIVERS UNDER THE EXPOSURE OF WHOLE BODY VIBRATION DURING HARROWING

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Amandeep Singh ◽  
Harwinder Singh ◽  
Chander Prakash ◽  
Lakhwinder Pal Singh ◽  
Sarbjit Singh
Author(s):  
Hassan Navhi ◽  
Mohammad Hosseini Fouladi ◽  
Mohd Jailani Mohd Nor

Safety ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 61
Author(s):  
Amandeep Singh ◽  
Siby Samuel ◽  
Harwinder Singh ◽  
Yash Kumar ◽  
Chander Prakash

This study investigated whole-body vibration (WBV) response in real field harrowing operations at different tractor ride conditions i.e., average speed, front harrow pin angle (FHPA), and rear harrow pin distance (RHPD). Taguchi’s L27 orthogonal array was used to formulate a systematic design of experiments. WBV exposure was measured along the three translational axes to compute overall daily vibration magnitude i.e., A(8). Tractor’s seat isolation capacity was assessed in terms of Seat Effective Amplitude Transmissibility i.e., SEAT%. Raw acceleration data was analysed to obtain dominant frequencies using Fast Fourier Transform (FFT). A(8) was found to range between 0.43 to 0.87 m/s2 in the experimental trials. Seat isolation capacity was found to be poor in 89% of the experiments i.e., SEAT% > 100%. Average speed and FHPA was found to have a significant impact (p ≤ 0.05) on A(8) and SEAT%. FFT response showed a range of primary and secondary dominant peaks within a frequency range of 0.2 to 11 Hz. In conclusion, the majority of experimental trials (67%) exceeded the Directive2002/44EU recommended exposure action value (EAV) limit i.e., 0.5 m/s2. The harrowing operation was found to exhibit vibration exposure at low frequencies in the vicinity of natural frequencies of the human body and may consequently affect ride comfort.


Author(s):  
Prasad Bhagwan Kumbhar ◽  
Peijun Xu ◽  
Jingzhou (James) Yang

Vehicle ride comfort plays an important role in the vehicle design. Human body is very sensitive to whole body vibration. Vehicle ride comfort has brought lots of concerns in recent years due to requirement of better ride comfort performance for newly developed vehicles. Vehicle ride comfort has a direct effect on driver’s performance and will result in overall customer satisfaction. Various papers have reported vehicle ride comfort and various biodynamic models have been built in the literature. However, there is a lack of a comprehensive literature survey to summarize all biodynamic models for whole body vibration and vehicle ride comfort. The purpose of this paper is to have a literature review of biodynamic models. So this paper initially focuses on various health issues due to whole body vibrations. Whole body vibration transfers environmental vibration to human body through a large contact area. Vibration evaluation methods such as weighted root mean square (r.m.s.) acceleration method, fourth power VDV method are discussed. Along with that the paper will focus on various biodynamic response functions. Human models in the literature are divided into three main groups: lumped parameter (LP), finite element model (FE), and multibody model (MB). In the LP model, human body is represented by several concentrated masses which are connected by springs and dampers. The FE model considers that human body consists of numerous finite elements. And in MB model, human body is made of several rigid bodies connected by bushing element for both translational and rotational motion. So this paper thoroughly summarizes various models developed to reduce human body vibration. At the end, four different approaches of assessing ride comfort are summarized. These four approaches are ride measurement in vehicles, ride simulator test, shaker table test and subjective ride measurement.


Author(s):  
Amandeep Singh ◽  
Lakhwinder Pal Singh ◽  
Harwinder Singh ◽  
Sarbjit Singh

SIMULATION ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 93 (3) ◽  
pp. 225-236 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vivek Kumar ◽  
Vikas Rastogi ◽  
PM Pathak

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document