EFFICIENCY OF DIFFERENTIATED LONG TERM MAINTENANCE TREATMENT IN DENTAL IMPLANT SURGERY PATIENTS

2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (66) ◽  
pp. 136
Author(s):  
Yu. Yu. Yarov ◽  
Yu. I. Silenko
2019 ◽  
Vol 45 (4) ◽  
pp. 289-296 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ignacio García Gil ◽  
Barbara Molina Ponte ◽  
Sergio Trapote Mateo ◽  
Jaime Jiménez García

Oral bisphosphonates are commonly used to improve bone density in patients who suffer from a variety of pathologies. However, they have also been known to cause bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaws (BRONJ). The aim of this clinical case presentation is to (1) determine whether the currently recommended length of time that oral bisphosphonates should be discontinued, before performing dental implant surgery, is sufficient to prevent BRONJ and (2) to describe an alternative treatment for BRONJ. A 65-year-old female patient developed BRONJ after receiving mandibular dental implants 5 months after discontinuing alendronic acid (Fosamax). The BRONJ was treated by surgical osteotomy and plasma rich in growth factors (PRGF), and the patient was followed up with biweekly examinations, which included 0.2% chlorhexidine mouthwashes and removal of any remaining necrotic bone. The dental implants were loaded 41 weeks after surgery and followed up with periapical radiographs and implant stability quotient measurements at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postloading. Although the Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons protocols for suspension of presurgical oral bisphosphonates were followed, this patient still developed BRONJ after implant surgery. While a multitude of treatments have been described in the literature, there is not enough scientific evidence to support any one treatment. Based on this clinical case, it can be concluded that the potential adverse effects of oral bisphosphonates on the jaws could be greater than expected and that treatment with PRGF produces promising results, although more long-term studies are necessary to confirm these findings.


2016 ◽  
Vol 74 (7) ◽  
pp. 1354-1359 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luca Pisoni ◽  
Paolo Ordesi ◽  
Paolo Siervo ◽  
Andrea Edoardo Bianchi ◽  
Marco Persia ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 460-465 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giovanni Matarese ◽  
Luca Ramaglia ◽  
Luca Fiorillo ◽  
Gabriele Cervino ◽  
Floriana Lauritano ◽  
...  

Introduction: The specialty of periodontology has changed dramatically in recent years. With the long-standing goal of retaining teeth in a functional and esthetical state, the periodontology has developed a high level of expertise in the regeneration of bone and connective tissues that support the teeth. However, periodontists have also joined maxillofacial surgeons as the primary providers of implant surgery. Methods: The tremendous innovations of periodontists induced also by the marketplace resulted in predictable periodontal treatment outcomes for most patients by the implants led to a dramatically different marketplace in which many patients with periodontitis can be treated by the implants rather than the traditional periodontal treatment. Results: The aim of this article is to focus on the innovator’s dilemma for periodontists today is that key elements of our rewarding contributions to dentistry in recent decades are unlikely to be part of a strong and rewarding future for the profession. Conclusions: With the intriguing role of the personalized medicine approach that integrates genomic and clinical information to predict a possible predisposition, we do not suggest a reduced role for periodontists in dental implant surgery but rather a more prominent role in complex cases to achieve surgical implant needs and proper reconstruction and long-term maintenance of the patient’s health.


1970 ◽  
Vol 8 (13) ◽  
pp. 52.2-52

Table 2 of this article stated wrongly that mercaptopurine and melphalan are unsuitable for long-term maintenance treatment. Both drugs are in fact suitable for this purpose.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document