scholarly journals PEER REVIEW

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Editorial Team
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Scientific Quality ◽  
Peer Reviewers

We would like to thank our peer reviewers for the precious contributions in providing clinical, scientific, and methodological expertise for JMH Volume 2 Number 4 August 2019. We appreciate every thoughtful review of submitted manuscripts and for making important contributions to improve the scientific quality of articles published in JMH. We listed the names in alphabetical order.Ade Kurnia,dr.,SpKJDR Agung Budi,dr.,Sp.BSBenjamin J. Tanuwihardja, dr., SpP, FCCP.Cherry Azaria,dr.,M.KesDecky Gunawan,dr.,M.Kes,AIFODemes Chornelia Martantiningtyas,S.Si.,M.ScDewi Karita,dr.,M.ScDR.Diana Krisanti Jasaputra, dr.,M.Kesdr Dono, Sp.BDrs. Eko Suhartono, M.ScJuwita Raditya Ningsih,drg.,M.ScFanny Rahardja,dr.,M.SiFathul Huda, dr., Ph.D.Heddy Herdiman,dr.,M.KesJulia Windi Gunadi,dr.,M.KesLusiana Darsono,dr., M.Kes.DR.Med. Muhammad Hasan Bashari, dr., M.Kes.Noveline,dr.,Sp.SDr. Oeij Anindita Adhika, dr., M Kes.Prof. dr. Wahyuni Lukita Atmadja, PhDStella Tinia Hasianna,dr.,M.Kes,IBCLCSusan Irawati, B.Biomed Sc., M.Biomed Sc.DR. Teresa Liliana W, S.Si., M.Kes., PA(K)DR.Titik Respati,drg., MScPHYenni Limyati,dr.,S.Sn,Sp.KFRYuktiana Kharisma,dr.,M.Kes

scholarly journals Peer Review

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Editorial Team ◽  
Deni Firmansyah
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Scientific Quality ◽  
Peer Reviewers

We would like to thank our peer reviewers for the precious contributions in providing clinical,scientific, and methodological expertise for JMH Volume 3 Number 2 August 2021. Weappreciate every thoughtful review of submitted manuscripts and for making importantcontributions to improve the scientific quality of articles published in JMH.We listed the names in alphabetical order.Abram Pratama, dr., Sp.PD.Adhi Kristianto Sugianli, dr., Sp.PK(K), M.Kes.Prof. Dr. Asep Sukohar, dr., M.Kes.Deta Tanuwidjaja, dr., Sp.KFR., AIFO-K.Dimas Erlangga Luftimas, dr., M.Kes., Sp.GK.Edwin Setiabudi, dr., Sp.PD-KKV, FINASIMFenny, dr., Sp.PK., M.Kes.Ginna Megawati, dr., M.Kes.Grace Puspasari, dr., M.GiziDr. Guswan Wiwaha, dr., MM.Dr. Hana Ratnawati, dr., M.Kes., PA(K)Juwita Ningsih, drg., M.Sc.Dr. Meilinah Hidayat, dr., M.Kes.Santun Bhekti Rahimah, dr., M.Kes.The, Fransiska Eltania, dr., M.Kes., A3M.Teresa Lucretia, dr., M.Kes.Prof. Wahyuni Lukita Atmadja, dr., Ph.D.Yenni Limyati, dr., S.Sn., Sp.KFR.Yuktiana Kharisma, dr., M.Kes.

scholarly journals PEER REVIEW

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Editorial Team
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Scientific Quality ◽  
Peer Reviewers

We would like to thank our peer reviewers for the precious contributions in providing clinical, scientific, and methodological expertise for JMH Volume 2 Number 2 August 2018. We appreciate every thoughtful review of submitted manuscripts and for making important contributions to improve the scientific quality of articles published in JMH. We listed the names in alphabetical order.DR.Achadiyani,dr.,M.Kes Prof. DR. Ambrosius Purba, dr.,MS.,AIFOProf. Andreanus A. Soemardji, DEACherry Azaria,dr.,M.KesDecky Gunawan,dr., M.Kes,AIFODR.Guswan Wiwaha, dr., MMHeddy Herdiman,dr.,M.KesHendra Polii, drg., Sp.RKGJulia Windi Gunadi,dr.,M.KesJuly Ivone, dr., MKK., MPd.Ked Laella Kinghua Liana,dr.,Sp.PA,M.KesDR. Meilinah Hidayat, dr., M.KesRoro Wahyudianingsih,dr.,Sp.PASijani Prahastuti,dr.,M.KesStella Tinia Hasianna,dr., M.Kes,IBCLCYenni Limyati,dr.,Sp.KFR.,M.KesYuktiana Kharisma, dr., M.Kes

scholarly journals PEER REVIEW

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Editorial Team
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Scientific Quality ◽  
Alphabetical Order ◽  
Peer Reviewers

We would like to thank our peer reviewers for the precious contributions in providing clinical, scientific, and methodological expertise for JMH Volume 2 Number 3 February 2019. We appreciate every thoughtful review of submitted manuscripts and for making important contributions to improve the scientific quality of articles published in JMH. We listed the names in alphabetical order. Abram Pratama,dr.,SpPDDR.rer.nat. Afiat Berbudi, dr., M.KesDR.Med. Muhammad Hasan Bashari, dr., M.Kes.Cindra Paskaria,dr.,MKMDecky Gunawan,dr., M.Kes,AIFODemes Chornelia Martantiningtyas, S.Si., M.ScDono Pranoto,dr.,SpB., M.KesDrs. Eko Suhartono, M.ScFanny Rahardja,dr.,M.SiGrace Puspasari,dr.,M.GiziDR.Guswan Wiwaha, dr., MMDr. dr. Hana Ratnawati ,M.Kes., PA(K)Hanna, dr., M.Kes., PhD., AIFOJulia Windi Gunadi,dr.,M.KesLarissa, dr., Sp.PK, MMRSLimdawati Kwee,dr.,SpPD., FPCPLusiana Darsono,dr., M.Kes.Prof.Dr. Ridad Agoes,MPHDR. Sadeli Masria, dr., DMM., MS., Sp.MK.Stella Tinia Hasianna,dr., M.Kes.,IBCLCDR. Teresa Liliana W, S.Si., M.Kes., PA(K)DR.Titik Respati,drg., MScPHYenni Limyati,dr.,Sp.KFRDR.Yudi Mulyana H.,dr.,SpOG(K)Yuktiana Kharisma, dr., M.Kes

scholarly journals Peer Review

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Deni Firmansyah ◽  
Editorial Team
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Scientific Quality ◽  
Peer Reviewers

We would like to thank our peer reviewers for the precious contributions in providing clinical,scientific, and methodological expertise for JMH Volume 3 Number 1 February 2021. Weappreciate every thoughtful review of submitted manuscripts and for making importantcontributions to improve the scientific quality of articles published in JMH.We listed the names in alphabetical order.Abram Pratama, dr., Sp.PD.Dr.rer.nat. Afiat Berbudi, dr., M.Kes.Almira Aliyannissa, dr., Sp.A.Dr. Asep Sukohar, dr., M.Kes.Decky Gunawan, dr., M.Kes., AIFODr. Denny Agustiningsih, dr., M.Kes.Dr. Diana Krisanti Jasaputra, dr., M.Kes.Dimas Erlangga Luftimas, dr., M.Kes., Sp.GK.Dr. Gara Samara Brajadenta, dr., M.M., M.Si.Med., M.Sc, S.E.Grace Puspasari, dr., M.GiziHeddy Herdiman, dr. M.Kes.dr. Johan Lucianus, M.S.Dr. Julia Windi Gunadi, dr., M.Kes.Dr. Melati Sudiro, dr., Sp.THT-KL(K), M.Kes.Mohamad Indra Sapta, dr., Sp.THT-KL.Dr. Oeij Anindita Adhika, dr., M.Kes., PA(K)Ronny Lesmana, dr., M.Kes., AIFO, Ph.D.Stella Tinia Hasianna, dr., M.Kes., IBCLC.Dr. Titik Respati, drg., MScPH.Dr. Vinna Kurniawati Sugiaman, drg., M.Kes.Dr. Wahyu Widowati, M.Si.Dr. Welly Ratwita, dr., M.Kes.Yuktiana Kharisma, dr., M.Kes.

scholarly journals Peer Review

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Deni Firmansyah ◽  
Editorial Team
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Scientific Quality ◽  
Alphabetical Order ◽  
Peer Reviewers

We would like to thank our peer reviewers for the precious contributions in providing clinical, scientific, and methodological expertise for JMH Volume 2 Number 6 August 2020. We appreciate every thoughtful review of submitted manuscripts and for making important contributions to improve the scientific quality of articles published in JMH. We listed the names in alphabetical order. Adhi Kristianto Sugianli,dr.,Sp.PK(K),M.Kes Cherry Azaria,dr.,M.Kes      Cindra Paskaria,dr.,MKM Decky Gunawan,dr.,M.Kes,AIFO Demes Chornelia Martantiningtyas,S.Si.,M.Sc Dr.Fen Tih,dr.,M.Kes. Dr. Gara S. Brajadenta, Mm., Msc., M.Si.Med Dr.Guswan Wiwaha,dr.,MM Dr.Julia Windi Gunadi,dr.,M.Kes       Larissa, dr., Sp.PK, MMRS. Monica Paotiana,dr.,M.Gizi Dr Pramudji Hastuti,Apt.,M.S. Ronny Lesmana, dr., M.Kes, AIFO, Ph.D        Santun B Rahimah, dr., M.Kes. Stella Tinia Hasianna,dr., M.Kes.,IBCLC Susan Irawati, B.Biomed Sc., M.Biomed Sc. Teresa Lucretia,dr.,M.Kes Yuktiana Kharisma,dr.,M.Kes    

scholarly journals PEER REVIEW

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Editorial Team
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Scientific Quality ◽  
Alphabetical Order ◽  
Peer Reviewers

We would like to thank our peer reviewers for the precious contributions in providing clinical, scientific, and methodological expertise for JMH Volume 1 Number 6. We appreciate every thoughtful review of submitted manuscripts and for making important contributions to improve the scientific quality of articles published in JMH. We listed the names in alphabetical order. Adhi Kristianto Sugianli, dr., Sp.PK(K), M.KesAndri Rezano,dr.,M.Kes,Ph.DCindra Paskaria,dr., MKMCherry Azaria,dr., M.KesDrs. Eko Suhartono, M.ScDR.Guswan Wiwaha, dr., MMDR. Hana Ratnawati, dr., M.Kes., PA(K)Hanna, dr., M.Kes., Ph.D., AIFOJuly Ivone, dr., MKK., MPd.KedLarissa, dr., Sp.PK, MMRSDR. Meilinah Hidayat, dr., M.KesDR. Oeij Anindita Adhika,dr., M.Kes., PA(K)Rizna Tyrani, dr., M.KesStella Tinia Hasianna, dr., M.KesDR. Teresa Liliana Wargasetia, S.Si., M.Kes., PA(K)Vinna Kurniawati, drg., M.Kes

scholarly journals PEER REVIEW

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Editorial Team
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Scientific Quality ◽  
Peer Reviewers

We would like to thank our peer reviewers for the precious contributions in providing clinical,scientific, and methodological expertise for JMH Volume 2 Number 1 February 2018. We appreciateevery thoughtful review of submitted manuscripts and for making important contributions toimprove the scientific quality of articles published in JMH. We listed the names in alphabetical order.Adhi Kristianto Sugianli, dr., Sp.PK(K), M.KesProf. Andreanus A. Soemardji, DEAAndri Rezano,dr.,M.Kes,PhDCindra Paskaria,dr., MKMCherry Azaria,dr., M.Kesdr. Decky Gunawan,M.Kes,AIFOFathul Huda, dr., Ph.D.Grace Puspasari,dr.,M.GiziDR. Hana Ratnawati, dr., M.Kes., PA(K)Julia Windi Gunadi,dr.,M.KesJuly Ivone, dr., MKK., MPd.KedLarissa, dr., Sp.PK, MMRSLusiana Darsono, dr.,M.Kes.DR. Oeij Anindita Adhika,dr., M.Kes., PA(K)Ronny Lesmana, dr., M.Kes, AIFO, Ph.DStella Tinia Hasianna, dr., M.KesDR. Teresa Liliana Wargasetia, S.Si., M.Kes., PA(K)DR. Wahyu Widowati, M.Si.

FUNDAMENTAL AND APPLIED SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH: сб.науч.тр./ OEAPS Inc.; редкол.: Флора Бертран (отв.ред.) [и др.]. - Берлин, Германия : OEAPS Inc., 2018. - 58 С.

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Мария Григорьевна Алпатова ◽  
Мария Игоревна Щеглова ◽  
Elmira Kalybaevna Adil’bekova ◽  
Nuradin Alibaev ◽  
Arunas Svitojus
Keyword(s):  
Service Sector ◽  
Applied Research ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Scientific Quality ◽  
Final Decision ◽  
Main Criterion ◽  
The Public ◽  
Peer Reviewers ◽  
Verification Process

The conference is a major international forum for analyzing and discussing trends and approaches in research in the field of basic science and applied research. We provide a platform for discussions on innovative, theoretical and empirical research. The form of the conference: in absentia, without specifying the form in the collection of articles. Working languages: Russian, English Doctors and candidates of science, scientists, specialists of various profiles and directions, applicants for academic degrees, teachers, graduate students, undergraduates, students are invited to participate in the conference. There is one blind verification process in the journal. All articles will be initially evaluated by the editor for compliance with the journal. Manuscripts that are considered appropriate are then usually sent to at least two independent peer reviewers to assess the scientific quality of the article. The editor is responsible for the final decision on whether to accept or reject the article. The editor's decision is final. The main criterion used in assessing the manuscript submitted to the journal is: uniqueness or innovation in the work from the point of view of the methodology being developed and / or its application to a problem of particular importance in the public sector or service sector and / or the setting in which the efforts, for example, in the developing region of the world. That is, the very model / methodology, application and context of problems, at least one of them must be unique and important. Additional criteria considered in the consideration of the submitted document are its accuracy, organization / presentation (ie logical flow) and recording quality.

FUNDAMENTAL AND APPLIED SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH April 2019: сб.науч.тр./ OEAPS Inc.; редкол.: Флора Бертран (отв.ред.) [и др.]. - Берлин, Германия : OEAPS Inc., 2019. - 98 C.

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Изабелла Станиславовна Чибисова ◽  
Диана Ильгизаровна Шарипова ◽  
Альфия Галиевна Зулькарнаева ◽  
Ксения Александровна Дулова ◽  
Садег Амирзадеган ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Service Sector ◽  
Applied Research ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Scientific Quality ◽  
Final Decision ◽  
Main Criterion ◽  
The Public ◽  
Peer Reviewers ◽  
Verification Process

The conference is a major international forum for analyzing and discussing trends and approaches in research in the field of basic science and applied research. We provide a platform for discussions on innovative, theoretical and empirical research. The form of the conference: in absentia, without specifying the form in the collection of articles. Working languages: Russian, English Doctors and candidates of science, scientists, specialists of various profiles and directions, applicants for academic degrees, teachers, graduate students, undergraduates, students are invited to participate in the conference. There is one blind verification process in the journal. All articles will be initially evaluated by the editor for compliance with the journal. Manuscripts that are considered appropriate are then usually sent to at least two independent peer reviewers to assess the scientific quality of the article. The editor is responsible for the final decision on whether to accept or reject the article. The editor's decision is final. The main criterion used in assessing the manuscript submitted to the journal is: uniqueness or innovation in the work from the point of view of the methodology being developed and / or its application to a problem of particular importance in the public sector or service sector and / or the setting in which the efforts, for example, in the developing region of the world. That is, the very model / methodology, application and context of problems, at least one of them must be unique and important. Additional criteria considered in the consideration of the submitted document are its accuracy, organization / presentation (ie logical flow) and recording quality.

scholarly journals Evaluating, Improving, and Appreciating Peer Review at IJTMB

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-3
Author(s):  
Ann Blair Kennedy, LMT, BCTMB, DrPH
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Peer Review Process ◽  
Scientific Publishing ◽  
Publication Process ◽  
Improve Efficiency ◽  
Peer Reviewers

  Peer review is a mainstay of scientific publishing and, while peer reviewers and scientists report satisfaction with the process, peer review has not been without criticism. Within this editorial, the peer review process at the IJTMB is defined and explained. Further, seven steps are identified by the editors as a way to improve efficiency of the peer review and publication process. Those seven steps are: 1) Ask authors to submit possible reviewers; 2) Ask reviewers to update profiles; 3) Ask reviewers to “refer a friend”; 4) Thank reviewers regularly; 5) Ask published authors to review for the Journal; 6) Reduce the length of time to accept peer review invitation; and 7) Reduce requested time to complete peer review. We believe these small requests and changes can have a big effect on the quality of reviews and speed in which manuscripts are published. This manuscript will present instructions for completing peer review profiles. Finally, we more formally recognize and thank peer reviewers from 2018–2020.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document