scholarly journals A Comparison of Solvers for Propositional Dynamic Logic

10.29007/63hq ◽  
2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ullrich Hustadt ◽  
Renate A. Schmidt
Keyword(s):  
Dynamic Logic ◽  
Propositional Dynamic Logic ◽  
Dynamic Logics

Calculi for propositional dynamic logics have been investigated since the introduction of this logic in the late seventies. Only in recent years have practical procedures been suggested and implemented. In this paper, we compare three such systems, namely, the Tableau Workbench by Abate, Gore, and Widmann (2009), the pdlProver system by Gore and Widmann (2009), and the MLSolver system by Friedmann and Lange (2009).

2-Exp Time lower bounds for propositional dynamic logics with intersection

2005 ◽  
Vol 70 (4) ◽  
pp. 1072-1086 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Lange ◽  
Carsten Lutz
Keyword(s):  
Lower Bound ◽  
Lower Bounds ◽  
Open Problem ◽  
Dynamic Logic ◽  
Propositional Dynamic Logic ◽  
Tree Structures ◽  
Exponential Time ◽  
Double Exponential ◽  
Test Operator ◽  
Dynamic Logics

AbstractIn 1984. Danecki proved that satisfiability in IPDL, i.e., Propositional Dynamic Logic (PDL) extended with an intersection operator on programs, is decidabie in deterministic double exponential time. Since then, the exact complexity of IPDL has remained an open problem: the best known lower bound was the ExpTime one stemming from plain PDL until, in 2004. the first author established ExpSpace-hardness. In this paper, we finally close the gap and prove that IPDL is hard for 2-ExpTime. thus 2-ExpTime-complete. We then sharpen our lower bound, showing that it even applies to IPDL without the test operator interpreted on tree structures.

Decidability and Complexity of Some Finitely-valued Dynamic Logics

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Igor Sedlár
Keyword(s):  
Transitive Closure ◽  
Description Logics ◽  
Dynamic Logic ◽  
Time Algorithm ◽  
Action Execution ◽  
Propositional Dynamic Logic ◽  
Relational Models ◽  
Reasoning About Actions ◽  
Decidability And Complexity ◽  
Dynamic Logics

Propositional Dynamic Logic, PDL, is a well known modal logic formalizing reasoning about complex actions. We study many-valued generalizations of PDL based on relational models where satisfaction of formulas in states and accessibility between states via action execution are both seen as graded notions, evaluated in a finite Łukasiewicz chain. For each n>1, the logic PDŁn is obtained using the n-element Łukasiewicz chain, PDL being equivalent to PDŁ2. These finitely-valued dynamic logics can be applied in formalizing reasoning about actions specified by graded predicates, reasoning about costs of actions, and as a framework for certain graded description logics with transitive closure of roles. Generalizing techniques used in the case of PDL we obtain completeness and decidability results for all PDŁn. A generalization of Pratt's exponential-time algorithm for checking validity of formulas is given and EXPTIME-hardness of each PDŁn validity problem is established by embedding PDL into PDŁn.

scholarly journals Dynamic Linear Time Temporal Logic

1997 ◽  
Vol 4 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jesper G. Henriksen ◽  
P. S. Thiagarajan
Keyword(s):  
Temporal Logic ◽  
Linear Time ◽  
Dynamic Logic ◽  
Order Theory ◽  
Simple Extension ◽  
Propositional Dynamic Logic ◽  
First Order ◽  
Time Semantics ◽  
Linear Time Temporal Logic ◽  
Obvious Manner

A simple extension of the propositional temporal logic of linear<br />time is proposed. The extension consists of strengthening the until<br />operator by indexing it with the regular programs of propositional<br />dynamic logic (PDL). It is shown that DLTL, the resulting logic, is<br />expressively equivalent to S1S, the monadic second-order theory<br />of omega-sequences. In fact a sublogic of DLTL which corresponds<br />to propositional dynamic logic with a linear time semantics is<br />already as expressive as S1S. We pin down in an obvious manner<br />the sublogic of DLTL which correponds to the first order fragment<br />of S1S. We show that DLTL has an exponential time decision<br />procedure. We also obtain an axiomatization of DLTL. Finally,<br />we point to some natural extensions of the approach presented<br />here for bringing together propositional dynamic and temporal<br />logics in a linear time setting.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document