scholarly journals Dynamic Linear Time Temporal Logic

1997 ◽  
Vol 4 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jesper G. Henriksen ◽  
P. S. Thiagarajan
Keyword(s):  
Temporal Logic ◽  
Linear Time ◽  
Dynamic Logic ◽  
Order Theory ◽  
Simple Extension ◽  
Propositional Dynamic Logic ◽  
First Order ◽  
Time Semantics ◽  
Linear Time Temporal Logic ◽  
Obvious Manner

A simple extension of the propositional temporal logic of linear<br />time is proposed. The extension consists of strengthening the until<br />operator by indexing it with the regular programs of propositional<br />dynamic logic (PDL). It is shown that DLTL, the resulting logic, is<br />expressively equivalent to S1S, the monadic second-order theory<br />of omega-sequences. In fact a sublogic of DLTL which corresponds<br />to propositional dynamic logic with a linear time semantics is<br />already as expressive as S1S. We pin down in an obvious manner<br />the sublogic of DLTL which correponds to the first order fragment<br />of S1S. We show that DLTL has an exponential time decision<br />procedure. We also obtain an axiomatization of DLTL. Finally,<br />we point to some natural extensions of the approach presented<br />here for bringing together propositional dynamic and temporal<br />logics in a linear time setting.

scholarly journals A Product Version of Dynamic Linear Time Temporal Logic

1997 ◽  
Vol 4 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jesper G. Henriksen ◽  
P. S. Thiagarajan
Keyword(s):  
Temporal Logic ◽  
Decision Procedure ◽  
Linear Time ◽  
Dynamic Logic ◽  
Two Dimensions ◽  
Sequential Programs ◽  
Propositional Dynamic Logic ◽  
The Core ◽  
Finite Set ◽  
Linear Time Temporal Logic

We present here a linear time temporal logic which simultaneously extends LTL, the propositional temporal logic of linear time, along two dimensions. Firstly, the until operator is strengthened by indexing it with the regular programs of propositional dynamic logic (PDL). Secondly, the core formulas of the logic are decorated with names of sequential agents drawn from fixed finite set. The resulting logic has a natural semantics in terms of the runs of a distributed program consisting of a finite set of sequential programs that communicate by performing common actions together. We show that our logic, denoted DLTL, admits an exponential time decision procedure. We also show that DLTL is expressively equivalent to the so called regular product languages.

scholarly journals An Expressively Complete Linear Time Temporal Logic for Mazurkiewicz Traces

1996 ◽  
Vol 3 (62) ◽  
Author(s):  
P. S. Thiagarajan ◽  
Igor Walukiewicz
Keyword(s):  
Temporal Logic ◽  
Linear Time ◽  
Order Reduction ◽  
Expressive Power ◽  
Order Theory ◽  
First Order ◽  
First Order Theory ◽  
Reduction Methods ◽  
Linear Time Temporal Logic ◽  
Mazurkiewicz Traces

<p>A basic result concerning LTL, the propositional temporal logic of linear time, is that it is expressively complete; it is equal in expressive power to the first order theory of sequences. We present here a smooth extension of this result to the class of partial orders known as Mazurkiewicz traces. These partial orders arise in a variety of contexts in concurrency theory and they provide the conceptual basis for many of the partial order reduction methods that have been developed in connection with LTL-specifications.</p><p>We show that LTrL, our linear time temporal logic, is equal in expressive power to the first order theory of traces when interpreted over (finite and) infinite traces. This result fills a prominent gap in the existing logical theory of infinite traces. LTrL also provides a syntactic characterisation of the so-called trace consistent (robust) LTL-specifications. These are specifications expressed as LTL formulas that do not distinguish between different linearisations of the same trace and hence are amenable to partial order reduction methods.</p>

scholarly journals Reasoning about actions with Temporal Answer Sets

2012 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 201-225 ◽  
Author(s):  
LAURA GIORDANO ◽  
ALBERTO MARTELLI ◽  
DANIELE THESEIDER DUPRÉ
Keyword(s):  
Temporal Logic ◽  
Linear Time ◽  
Dynamic Logic ◽  
Bounded Model Checking ◽  
Propositional Dynamic Logic ◽  
Reasoning About Actions ◽  
Action Language ◽  
Linear Time Temporal Logic ◽  
Answer Sets ◽  
Answer Set

AbstractIn this paper, we combine Answer Set Programming (ASP) with Dynamic Linear Time Temporal Logic (DLTL) to define a temporal logic programming language for reasoning about complex actions and infinite computations. DLTL extends propositional temporal logic of linear time with regular programs of propositional dynamic logic, which are used for indexing temporal modalities. The action language allows general DLTL formulas to be included in domain descriptions to constrain the space of possible extensions. We introduce a notion of Temporal Answer Set for domain descriptions, based on the usual notion of Answer Set. Also, we provide a translation of domain descriptions into standard ASP and use Bounded Model Checking (BMC) techniques for the verification of DLTL constraints.

scholarly journals Temporal logic programs with variables

2016 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 226-243 ◽  
Author(s):  
FELICIDAD AGUADO ◽  
PEDRO CABALAR ◽  
GILBERTO PÉREZ ◽  
CONCEPCIÓN VIDAL ◽  
MARTÍN DIÉGUEZ
Keyword(s):  
Temporal Logic ◽  
Linear Time ◽  
Logic Program ◽  
Answer Set Programming ◽  
Logic Programs ◽  
First Order ◽  
Linear Time Temporal Logic ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Stable Models ◽  
Answer Set

AbstractIn this note, we consider the problem of introducing variables in temporal logic programs under the formalism of Temporal Equilibrium Logic, an extension of Answer Set Programming for dealing with linear-time modal operators. To this aim, we provide a definition of a first-order version of Temporal Equilibrium Logic that shares the syntax of first-order Linear-time Temporal Logic but has different semantics, selecting some Linear-time Temporal Logic models we call temporal stable models. Then, we consider a subclass of theories (called splittable temporal logic programs) that are close to usual logic programs but allowing a restricted use of temporal operators. In this setting, we provide a syntactic definition of safe variables that suffices to show the property of domain independence – that is, addition of arbitrary elements in the universe does not vary the set of temporal stable models. Finally, we present a method for computing the derivable facts by constructing a non-temporal logic program with variables that is fed to a standard Answer Set Programming grounder. The information provided by the grounder is then used to generate a subset of ground temporal rules which is equivalent to (and generally smaller than) the full program instantiation.

Verifying linear time temporal logic properties of concurrent Ada programs with quasar

2004 ◽  
Vol XXIV (1) ◽  
pp. 17-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Evangelista ◽  
C. Kaiser ◽  
J. F. Pradat-Peyre ◽  
P. Rousseau
Keyword(s):  
Temporal Logic ◽  
Linear Time ◽  
Linear Time Temporal Logic

Vehicle route-sequence planning using temporal logic

2002 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-38
Author(s):  
KIAM TIAN SEOW ◽  
MICHEL PASQUIER
Keyword(s):  
Temporal Logic ◽  
Linear Time ◽  
Simple Procedure ◽  
Precedence Constraints ◽  
Sequence Planning ◽  
Vehicle Route ◽  
Passenger Travel ◽  
State Formula ◽  
Linear Time Temporal Logic ◽  
Service Task

This paper proposes a new logical framework for vehicle route-sequence planning of passenger travel requests. Each request is a fetch-and-send service task associated with two request-locations, namely, a source and a destination. The proposed framework is developed using propositional linear time temporal logic of Manna and Pnueli. The novelty lies in the use of the formal language for both the specification and theorem-proving analysis of precedence constraints among the location visits that are inherent in route sequences. In the framework, legal route sequences—each of which visits every request location once and only once in the precedence order of fetch-and-send associated with every such request—is formalized and justified, forming a basis upon which the link between a basic precedence constraint and the corresponding canonical forbidden-state formula is formally established. Over a given base route plan, a simple procedure to generate a feasible subplan based on a specification of the forbidden-state canonical form is also given. An example demonstrates how temporal logic analysis and the proposed procedure can be applied to select a final (feasible) subplan based on additional precedence constraints.

Ein Ansatz zur formalen Verifikation von Schaltungsbeschreibungen in SystemC (An Approach for Formal Verification of Circuits in SystemC)

2003 ◽  
Vol 45 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Große ◽  
Rolf Drechsler
Keyword(s):  
Formal Verification ◽  
Temporal Logic ◽  
Linear Time ◽  
Linear Time Temporal Logic

ZusammenfassungDer vorgestellte Ansatz ermöglicht es, für SystemC-Schaltkreisbeschreibungen, die über einer gegebenen Gatterbibliothek definiert sind, Eigenschaften zu beweisen (engl. property checking). Als Spezifikationssprache wird LTL (linear time temporal logic) verwendet. Für den Beweis einer LTL-Eigenschaft kann die Erfüllbarkeit einer Booleschen Funktion betrachtet werden, die aus der Eigenschaft und der Schaltkreisbeschreibung mittels symbolischer Methoden konstruiert wird. Im Gegensatz zu simulationsbasierten Ansätzen kann dabei Vollständigkeit gewährleistet werden. Anhand einer Fallstudie eines skalierbaren Arbiters wird die Effizienz des Beweisverfahrens untersucht.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document