The significance of dinoflagellates in the Miocene Choptank Formation beneath the Midlothian gravels in the southeastern Virginia Piedmont

Stratigraphy ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 179-195 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucy E. Edwards ◽  
Robert E. Weems ◽  
Mark W. Carter ◽  
David B. Spears ◽  
David S. Powars
Keyword(s):  
2003 ◽  
Vol 68 (1) ◽  
pp. 109-128 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gary H. Dunham ◽  
Debra L. Gold ◽  
Jeffrey L. Hantman

Recent excavation and analysis of the remaining section of the endangered Rapidan Mound site (44OR1) in the central Virginia Piedmont provide new insights into a unique complex of burial mounds in the Virginia interior. Known since Thomas Jefferson's eighteenth-century description, the mounds are both earth and stone and accretional earthen mounds. Thirteen are recorded, all dating to the late prehistoric and early contact era (ca. A.D. 900-1700). Typically containing few artifacts, the accretional mounds are unusual in North America in the numbers of individuals interred, more than one thousand in at least two cases, and in the nature of the secondary, collective burial ritual that built up the mounds over centuries. Following a review of the characteristics of the mound complex, we focus on the Rapidan Mound and the analysis of the collective, secondary burial features in the mound. Precise provenience information and bioarchaeological analyses of two large and intact collective burial features provide new information on health and diet, and several lines of evidence for demographic reconstruction. Finally, we discuss the mortuary ritual conducted at the mounds within the cultural and historical context of the region.


1989 ◽  
Vol 53 (3) ◽  
pp. 928-933 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. J. Thomas ◽  
T. W. Simpson ◽  
J. C. Baker
Keyword(s):  

2013 ◽  
Vol 59 (1) ◽  
pp. 50-62 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeremy P. Stovall ◽  
Thomas R. Fox ◽  
John R. Seiler

1995 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 283-319
Author(s):  
Michael D. Petraglia

This article presents the results of a refitting study performed on lithic artifacts from 44LD124, a quartzite quarry in Loudoun County, Virginia. Spatial variation in quarry debris and refits demonstrated differences in intrasite reduction strategies. In one section of the site, where fire-altered quartzite debris occurred, twenty sets of refits were obtained, fifteen of which bore signs of fire-cracking or heating. In another part of the site, eleven groups of debitage were reassembled, reforming cobbles and boulders. To examine the technological and spatial consequences of various reduction techniques, quartzite percussion experiments were conducted. The technological, spatial and experimental analyses suggested that some of the reassembled groups were reduced by anvil and hammerstone percussion, in a high position from the ground, likely employing standing or kneeling stances. The findings derived from analysis of the 44LD124 materials provide information regarding quartzite procurement in the Virginia Piedmont and the Potomac River drainage.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document