scholarly journals Tramadol as an adjunct to bupivacaine for brachial plexus block.

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (09) ◽  
pp. 1482-1486
Author(s):  
Afifa Zahoor ◽  
Ranna Mussrat ◽  
Muhammad Ahmad Khan ◽  
Shakeel Ahmad
Keyword(s):  
Brachial Plexus ◽  
Brachial Plexus Block ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Orthopedic Procedures ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
P Value ◽  
Rescue Analgesia ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Plexus Block

Objectives: To compare the efficacy of tramadol and 0.25% bupivacaine versus 0.25% bupivacaine alone for brachial plexus block. Study Design: Randomized controlled study. Setting: Orthopedic department of Nishtar Medical University/Hospital Multan. Period: The study duration was Jan-2018 to Aug-2018. Material and Methods: 148 patients planned for with upper limb orthopedic procedures under BPB in the department of orthopedics department Nishtar Hospital Multan were included in this analysis. To Patients were randomly divided into two equal groups by lottery method. Group A patients were given solution with 38 ml 0.25% bupivacaine with 100 mg tramadol 2 ml and group B were given solution with 38 ml 0.25% bupivacaine and 2 ml 0.9 % normal saline. Time of onset of block and its duration and need for rescue analgesics were noted. Results: Time of onset of block was 14.56+1.01 minutes in group A versus 15.96+1.64 minutes in group B (p-value <0.001). Mean analgesia duration was 355.85+42.18 minutes in group A versus 310.47+38.79 minutes in group B (p-value <0.001). There were 51 (68.9%) patients in group A who required rescue analgesia and 68 (91.9%) patients in group B required rescue analgesia (p-value 0.004). Conclusion: We concluded that the addition of tramadol as adjunct to bupivacaine for BPB significantly shortens the duration of onset, prolongs the duration of analgesia and reduces the need for rescue analgesics.

scholarly journals Effect of Verapamil Adjuvant with Local Anaesthetic Mixtures in Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block

2019 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. 43-47
Author(s):  
Md Arman Ali ◽  
Md Latifur Rahman ◽  
Mehdi Hassan ◽  
Rezwanur Rahman ◽  
Kai Nur Asfia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Brachial Plexus ◽  
Brachial Plexus Block ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Onset Time ◽  
Sensory Block ◽  
Local Anaesthetics ◽  
P Value ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Plexus Block

Among the various approaches to block brachial plexus , supraclavicular approach offers a high success rate for elbow, forearm and hand surgery . Various adjuvant drugs have been used with local anesthetics in order to decrease the time of onset and prolong the duration and quality of regional blocks. So efforts were made to combine the adjuvant with local anesthetics to improve patient and surgeon satisfaction. In this randomized study we tried to see the effect of verapamil in brachial plexus block as an adjuvant with local anaesthetic .This randomized study wasconducted in Anaesthesiology department of ShaheedZiaurRahman Medical College Hospital after approved by the ethical review board of this hospital.The study subject were divided into two groups (Group A=only local anaesthetics&Group B=local anaesthetics with Verapamil) , 30 IN numbers in each group. Group-A patients was administered 15ml of 1% lignocaine with 15 ml of bupivacaine 0.25% while in Group-B patients was administered injection verapamil 3.5 ml (3.5 mg) in addition to the above mixture. In this study mean onset time of sensory block was 11.53 ± 1.4 minutes in group - A and 7.12 ± 1.68 minutes in group – B which is not statistically significant (p value = 0.057). The mean onset time of motor block in group A was 15.26 ± 1.96 min, and in group B was 11.58 ± 2.68 min and this difierence isstatistically significant (p value=0.000152). Duration of motor block was 96.30 min and 115.08 min in group A and Group B respectively. Sensory block was 157.26 min and 188.0 min in group A and Group B respectively. Regarding the heart rate, no significant difference was detected between the groups at the time of preanesthesia and at the 5 min after anaesthesia. Compared with group B patients, group A patients shows slight but statistically significant increased heart rate at the 10 min (80, 92 beat/min respectively) after brachial plexus block. At 30 minute after, mean systolic BP was 97.9±4.7 mmHg in group A and 84.3±5.0 mmHg in group B. At 45 minute after, mean systolic blood pressure was 94.6±15.6 mmHg and 84.3±5.0 mmHg in group A and group B respectively. At 60 minutes after, mean systolic blood pressure was 59.6±6.0 mmHg in group A and 61.2±9.4 mmHg in group B. At 15, 30 and 45 minute difference was statistically significant (p<0.05) between two groups. In conclusion, the study revealed that verapamil can be used as an adjuvant to decrease the onset time of sensory and motor blocks of bupivacaine in supraclavicular block. Moreover, verapamil doses in regional blocks did not show any hemodynamic side effects. Bangladesh Med J. 2017 May; 46 (2): 43-47

scholarly journals A Randomized Controlled Trial: Comparison of 4% Articaine versus 0.5% Bupivacaine for Ambulatory Orthopedic Surgery under Supraclavicular Block

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Simon H. Armanious ◽  
Gamal A. Abdelhameed
Keyword(s):  
Brachial Plexus ◽  
Motor Block ◽  
Brachial Plexus Block ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
Home Discharge ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Plexus Block

Background. Articaine has been used in many dental and ophthalmic outpatient procedures. In the era of ultrasound-guided regional techniques, we searched for short and potent local anesthetic for patients undergoing ambulatory upper limb procedures. However, studies about articaine efficacy in brachial plexus block are limited. In this study, we compared its safety and efficacy against bupivacaine as a commonly used anesthetic agent for ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block. Methods. This randomized prospective study was performed at Ain Shams University Hospital from January to March 2020. A total of 117 patients aged 20 to 60 years, with the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I and II, were enrolled in the study. Patients were randomly allocated into two groups: in group A, patients received 30 ml articaine 2%, and in group B, patients received 30 ml of bupivacaine 0.5%. We measured motor and sensory block duration as a primary outcome. Other secondary outcomes such as onset of block, duration of analgesia, patient satisfaction, and time to home discharge readiness were also measured. Results. We analyzed data collected from 97 patients. The motor block duration was significantly shorter in group A (165.73 ± 20.33 min) than in group B (220.27 ± 37.73 min). The onset of motor block was faster in group A (8.73 ± 4.33 min), and the postoperative VAS score was lower in group B. Patients in group A achieved an earlier home discharge of 289.67 ± 2.73 min. Conclusion. Earlier resolution of articaine block makes it more favorable than bupivacaine for ambulatory surgery. This trial is registered with (NCT04189198).

scholarly journals Effectiveness of Nalbuphine with Ropivacaine in Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block in Patients Undergoing Upper Limb Surgeries

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (7) ◽  
pp. 1791-1793
Keyword(s):  
Brachial Plexus ◽  
Upper Limb ◽  
Motor Block ◽  
Brachial Plexus Block ◽  
P Value ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Plexus Block

Objective: To investigate the effectiveness of ropivacaine in supraclavicular brachial plexus block by nalbuphine and compare it to ropivacaine alone. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial Place and Duration of Study: Department of Anaesthesia, Fatima Memorial Hospital/College of Medicine & Dentistry, Lahore from 1st June 2020 to 31st March 2021. Methods: Ninety six patients of both genders with ages 20 to 65 years undergoing upper limb surgical procedure electively were included. All the patients were divided equally in to two groups, each group consist of 48 patients. Group A treated with ropivacaine with nalbuphine and group B treated with ropivacaine normal saline. Effectiveness between both groups was examined. Results: No significant difference was observed regarding age, gender, body mass index and ASA class I/II between both groups with p-value >0.05.A significant difference was found regarding onset time of sensory and motor block between both groups (p=0.001). Mean sensory block duration in group A was more 425.18±17.82 minutes as compared to group B 254.43±20.44 minutes. Mean duration of motor block was also more in group A 418.65±20.84 minutes as compared to group B 226.15±12.52 minutes. Duration of analgesia was high in group A as compared to group B with p-value <0.05. Conclusion: In supraclavicular brachial plexus block 0.75% with 10mg of nalbuphine is particularly effective in sensory, motor, and analgesic periods in relation to ropivacaine alone. Keywords: Supraclavicular, Brachial plexus block, Ropivacaine, Nalbuphine, Duration of analagesia

scholarly journals A comparative study between the effect of verapamil versus nalbuphine as an adjuvant in supraclavicular brachial plexus block

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammed Ibrahim Khamis ◽  
Ahmed Saeed Mohamed ◽  
Hesham Mohamed El Azazy ◽  
Hala Salah El Ozairy ◽  
Mohamed Moien Mohamed
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Brachial Plexus ◽  
Normal Saline ◽  
Motor Block ◽  
Brachial Plexus Block ◽  
Sensory Block ◽  
Motor Blockade ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Plexus Block

Abstract Background Brachial plexus block has substituted general anesthesia in the majority of patients planned for upper limb surgeries as it avoids the undesired effects of the medications used in general anesthesia as well as the stress response associated with airway manipulation. Opioid agonist–antagonists such as nalbuphine are used as adjuvant to improve the anesthetic properties of bupivacaine. Verapamil has an additive effect in brachial plexus blockade in the form of decreasing the consumption of analgesics in the postoperative period with reducing onset time and extending the duration of motor and sensory blockade. The aim of this study is to investigate the adjuvant effect of verapamil versus nalbuphine to 0.5% bupivacaine in brachial plexus block as regards onset, duration of sensory and motor blockade and postoperative analgesic augmentation. The study is randomized, prospective, double-blinded, comparative study where 90 patients subjected to arm, forearm and hand surgeries were randomized into three groups, group A received 30 ml of plain bupivacaine 0.5% plus 2 ml of normal saline, group B received 30 ml of bupivacaine 0.5% plus 2 ml verapamil equivalent to 5 mg, group C received 30 ml of bupivacaine 0.5% plus 10 mg of nalbuphine diluted in 2 ml of normal saline. Results Results of this study showed that group C and group B sensory block time onset was 7.25 ± 1.5 vs. 10.92 ± 3.84 min, P < 0.001 and was shorter than that in group A (13.2 ± 2.66 min). In addition, the motor block onset was (11.10 ± 1.24 vs. 13.50 ± 3.77 min, P < 0.001) shorter than group A (17.16 ± 1.30 min). In group C and group B, sensory block duration was 396 ± 32.17 vs. 355.83 ± 18.48 min, P < 0.001, respectively and was longer than that in group A (321.13 ± 25.08 min). Also, there was prolonged motor block duration in group C and group B recording (338.92 ± 25.2 vs. 302.93 ± 15.24 min, P < 0.001) and was longer than that in group A (280.70 ± 32.35 min). Time of demand of rescue analgesia dose was significantly long in group C and group B (449.53 ± 52.45 vs. 418.13 ± 41.12 min, P < 0.001) and was longer than group A (361.31 ± 21.42 min). Both verapamil and nalbuphine have additive effect to bupivacaine improving the all anesthetic parameters of the block. Conclusion Both drugs produce favorable enhancement of time onset and effective prolongation of duration of sensory and motor blockade and extend the period of postoperative analgesia with superiority to nalbuphine over verapamil.

Dexamethasone as an Adjuvant to 0.5 % Ropivacaine for Ultrasound Guided Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (14) ◽  
pp. 849-853
Author(s):  
Shweta Saurin Mehta ◽  
Nidhiben Sureshbhai Patel
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Effects ◽  
Brachial Plexus ◽  
Upper Limb ◽  
Brachial Plexus Block ◽  
Supraclavicular Approach ◽  
Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Regional Anaesthetic Technique ◽  
Plexus Block

BACKGROUND Supraclavicular brachial plexus block is a reliable, regional anaesthetic technique for upper limb surgeries. Also known as “spinal of upper limb”.1 The present study was conducted to assess the analgesic efficacy of dexamethasone as an adjuvant to 0.5 % ropivacaine for ultrasound sonography (USG) guided brachial plexus block. METHODS 50 adult patients of American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I and II of both genders, aged 18 - 50 years scheduled for elective upper limb surgeries under brachial plexus block via supraclavicular approach were randomised into 2 groups of 25 patients each to receive either 20 ml of 0.5 % ropivacaine with 2 ml of normal saline (group A) or 20 ml of 0.5 % ropivacaine with 2 ml of dexamethasone (8 mg) (group B). RESULTS Use of ultrasound helps in better visualisation of nerves, needle & spread of local anaesthetic at brachial plexus block site. So, less amount of drug volume is required for the block. Time of onset of sensory and motor block was significantly lower in group B compared to group A. Mean duration of motor and sensory block was significantly longer in group B than group A. The duration of postoperative analgesia was 18.79 ± 2.31 hours in group B & 9.06 ± 0.35 hours in group A, with statistically highly significant difference (P < 0.05). There were no perioperative haemodynamic variations between the two groups and no complication of technique or adverse effects due to dexamethasone occurred. CONCLUSIONS Dexamethasone 8 mg has significantly extended duration of analgesia of brachial plexus block with no adverse effects. KEYWORDS Brachial Plexus Block, Ropivacaine, Dexamethasone, Supraclavicular Approach, Ultrasound Guidance

scholarly journals Effect of Addition of Dexamethasone to Local Anaesthetics in Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block

1970 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
SM Islam ◽  
MHMD Hossain ◽  
AA Maruf
Keyword(s):  
Brachial Plexus ◽  
Motor Block ◽  
Brachial Plexus Block ◽  
Onset Time ◽  
Local Anaesthetics ◽  
Prolonged Duration ◽  
Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Plexus Block

Introduction: Many-a-time local anaesthesia appears as a very effective alternative of general one. Different additives have been used to prolong regional blockade. Objective: This prospective study designed to evaluate the effect of dexamethasone added to local anaesthetics on the onset and duration of supraclavicular brachial plexus block. Methods: Sixty adult patients undergoing various orthopaedic surgeries on forearm and around the elbow under supraclavicular brachial plexus block were selected and divided into 2 groups of 30 each. In group-A patients received 35 ml of mixture of lignocaine 2%, bupivacaine 0.5% while in group-B patients received the same amount of local anaesthetics with dexamethasone (8 mg). The onset of sensory and motor block and duration of analgesia in two groups were compared and development of complications were observed. Result: The two groups were comparable in demographic data. The mean onset time of sensory block was 11.64±2.19 minutes in group A and 9.89±1.97 minutes in group B and difference was statistically significant (p<0.05). Onset of motor block was 13.32±0.98 minutes in group A and 11.09±1.28 minutes in group B and difference was statistically significant (p<0.05). There was markedly prolonged duration of analgesia in group-B, 11.87± 0.53 hours compared to group-A, 3.43±0.49 hours. The result was statistically highly significant (p<0.001). Both the groups had high success rate (>90%). The incidence of complication was low in both the groups. Conclusion: Addition of dexamethasone as an adjuvant to local anaesthetics in brachial plexus block results in significantly early onset and markedly prolonged duration of analgesia without any unwanted effects. Key words: Supraclavicular block; analgesia; local anaesthetics; dexamethasone DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/jafmc.v7i1.8619 JAFMC Bangladesh. Vol 7, No 1 (June) 2011; 11-14

scholarly journals A Comparative Study of Efficacy of Clonidine and Dexmedetomidine As An Adjuvant to Ropivacaine in Ultrasound Guided Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block Vis-À-Vis Onset of Surgical Anaesthesia and Duration of Effect in Upper Limb Surgeries

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (8) ◽  
pp. 513
Author(s):  
Sandeep Dubey ◽  
Rukhsana Najeeb ◽  
Arshid Ahmad Sofi
Keyword(s):  
Upper Limb ◽  
Motor Block ◽  
Brachial Plexus Block ◽  
P Value ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Plexus Block

Background: Supraclavicular block is a safe, reliable and cost effective technique of providing anesthesia for the upper limb surgeries. Objectives:  To evaluate the effect of Clonidine and Dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to Ropivacaine in ultrasound guided supraclavicular block in upper limb surgeries with respect to: Onset of sensory and motor block, Duration of sensory and motor block, Quality of block and Duration of post-operative analgesia. Materials and methods: The purpose of present study was to compare the effect of addition of clonidine 1mcg/kg vs dexmedetomidine 1mcg/kg to 20ml of 0.5% ropivacaine in ultrasound guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block. A total of 90 patients of ASA I and II, aged 18-60 years, of either gender, undergoing upper limb surgery were allocated to three groups. Each group consisted of 30 patients. They received drugs as under: Group-A (dexmedetomidine group) received 20ml of 0.5% ropivacaine plus 1μg/kg of dexmedetomidine. Group-B (clonidine group) received 20ml of 0.5% ropivacaine plus 1mcg/kg clonidine. Group-C (placebo group) received 20 ml of 0.5% ropivacaine plus 2 ml normal saline. Results: Onset of sensory block was faster in Group-A as compared to Group-B and Group-C. The difference was statistically significant (p-value<0.05). Onset of motor block was faster in Group-A as compared to Group-B and Group C. The difference was statistically significant (p-value<0.05). Patients of Group-A had significantly longer duration of sensory and motor block when compared with Group-B and Group-C (p-value<0.05). Duration of post-operative analgesia was significantly longer in Group-A as compared to Group-B and Group-C (p-value<0.05). Quality of block was significantly better in Group-A as compared to Group-B and Group-C (p-value<0.05). Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine prolongs the duration of sensory and motor block, duration of postoperative analgesia and improves the quality of block much more as compared to clonidine when used as an adjuvant to ropivacaine in supraclavicular brachial plexus block.

scholarly journals A Comparative Clinical Study of Levobupivacaine and Levobupivacaine with Dexmedetomidine for Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (13) ◽  
pp. 760-763
Author(s):  
Sabir Hasnat ◽  
Sohail Ahmad ◽  
Ashutosh Kumar Jha
Keyword(s):  
Brachial Plexus ◽  
Brachial Plexus Block ◽  
Motor Blockade ◽  
Duration Of Action ◽  
Upper Limb Surgery ◽  
Prolonged Duration ◽  
Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Plexus Block

BACKGROUND Sensory and motor functions of peripheral nerve can be blocked by injecting local anaesthetic around the group of nerves, which will stop the conduction of nerve impulse. Peripheral nerve block is a well-accepted technique in anaesthesia care. Brachial plexus block is also one of the reliable techniques in providing regional anaesthesia for upper limb surgery. METHODS This was a prospective, double blinded, randomised comparative study which included 40 patients of American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) grade I and II of either sex of 20 - 65 years old age groups for upper limb surgery. Cases were divided randomly into two groups: Group A: received levobupivacaine hydrochloride 0.5 % 25 cc with dexmedetomidine injection. Group B: received levobupivacaine hydrochloride 0.5 % 25 cc injection. Each individual was allocated to respective group by computer generated randomisation chart. Both group A and B were assessed for the onset of sensory & motor block, duration of postoperative analgesia and duration of action. RESULTS In the present study, it was observed that the onset of sensory blockade (P < 0.001) & motor blockade (P < 0.001) was earlier in groups A with prolonged duration of sensory & motor blockade (P < 0.001) as compared to group B. Group A took longer time for first rescue analgesia post operatively compared to group B, and the difference was found significant (P < 0.001). Both group A and group B were comparable for systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and heart rate. CONCLUSIONS The onset of sensory and motor blockade was early in 0.5 % levobupivacaine with dexmedetomidine with prolonged duration of action and required lesser dose of rescue analgesic in 0.5 % levobupivacaine with dexmedetomidine as compared to 0.5 % levobupivacaine in supraclavicular brachial plexus block. KEYWORDS Dexmedetomidine, Levobupivacaine, Brachial Plexus Block

scholarly journals Addition of 100 mg of Tramadol to 40 mL of 0.5% Ropivacaine for Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block Improves Postoperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Shoulder Surgeries as Compared to Ropivacaine Alone—A Randomized Controlled Study

Medicina ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 55 (7) ◽  
pp. 399 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eleftheria Soulioti ◽  
Athanasia Tsaroucha ◽  
Alexandros Makris ◽  
Maria Koutsaki ◽  
Eirini Sklika ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Brachial Plexus ◽  
Motor Block ◽  
Brachial Plexus Block ◽  
Sensory Block ◽  
Shoulder Surgery ◽  
Morphine Consumption ◽  
Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Plexus Block

Background and objectives: Brachial plexus block is commonly used in shoulder surgery, as it provides satisfactory surgical conditions and adequate postoperative pain control. However, there are contradictory reports regarding the addition of tramadol to the injected regional anesthetic solution. We performed a prospective randomized study to evaluate the effectiveness of tramadol as an adjuvant to ropivacaine during interscalene brachial plexus block and assess its impact on the opioid consumption and the early postoperative pain in patients that underwent shoulder surgery. Materials and Methods: Eighty patients scheduled for elective shoulder surgery and anesthesia via interscalene brachial plexus block were randomly divided into two groups. In group A (n = 40), a solution of 40 mL of ropivacaine 0.5% and 2 mL (100 mg) of tramadol was administered during the brachial plexus block, while in group B (n = 40), a solution of 40 mL of ropivacaine 0.5% and 2 mL NaCl 0.9% (placebo) was administered. The effectiveness and duration of sensory and motor blocks were recorded in both groups. The sensory block was assessed recording the loss of sensation to pin prick test over the skin distribution of the axillary, radial, and musculocutaneous nerves. The motor block was assessed using the modified 3-point Bromage score (0–2 points). Cumulative morphine consumption and pain, using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), were evaluated in both groups at 2, 4, 8, and 24 h after surgery. Results: Sensory block onset was achieved earlier in group A than in group B (5.21 ± 3.15 minutes (min) vs. 7.1 ± 4.51 min, p = 0.029). The motor block onset was similar between the two groups (13.08 ± 6.23 min vs. 13.28 ± 6.59 min; p = 0.932). The duration of the sensory block was longer in group A as compared to group B (13 ± 2.3 h vs. 12 ± 2.8 h; p = 0.013). The duration of the motor block did not present any difference between the groups (10 ± 2.2 h vs. 10 ± 2.8 h; p = 0.308). Differences in morphine administration were not significant at 2, 4, and 8 h, however, morphine consumption was found to be decreased in group A 24 h postoperatively A (p = 0.04). The values of VAS were similar at 2, 4, and 8 h, however, they were lower in group A at 24 h (p < 0.013). Conclusions: Combined regional administration of tramadol and ropivacaine during interscalene brachial plexus block improves the time of onset and the duration of the sensory block, while it is associated with reduced morphine consumption during the first 24 h after shoulder surgery.

scholarly journals Effectiveness of addition of neostigmine or dexamethasone to local anaesthetic in providing perioperative analgesia for brachial plexus block: A prospective, randomized, double blinded, controlled study

1970 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 302-309 ◽  
Author(s):  
RK Yadav ◽  
BP Sah ◽  
P Kumar ◽  
SN Singh
Keyword(s):  
Brachial Plexus ◽  
Local Anaesthetic ◽  
Brachial Plexus Block ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Motor Blockade ◽  
Analgesic Requirement ◽  
Perioperative Analgesia ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Plexus Block

Background: Various local anaesthetic agents are used for brachial plexus block.We compared effectiveness of addition of Dexamethasone versus Neostigmine to Lignocaine, adrenaline admixtures for Brachial plexus block in providing perioperative analgesia. Methods: Ninety patients were randomized in three groups and were received 24ml of study drugs. The group A [Lignocaine with adrenaline (1.5%)], group B [Lignocaine with adrenaline (1.5%)] +500?g Neostigmine, and group C (Lignocaine with adrenaline (1.5%) +4mg Dexamethasone) for brachial plexus block through supraclavicular approach. The observed parameters were onset of analgesia, completion of sensory and motor blockade, Duration of analgesia, Surgeon's score, side effects, number of supplemental analgesics doses and Visual analogue scale (VAS) score for pain in 12 hour of post-operative period. Results: Mean onset of analgesia 4.6±1.1 , 4.4±0.8 , 3.8±1.8 mins in group A, B and C respectively and the Mean onset of motor blockade were 7.7±2.0, 7.0±1.8, 6.0±2.1mins in group A, B and C respectively. Similarly Mean Complete sensory block in 10.6±3, 10.4±2.5, and 8.9±2.2mins and Mean complete motor block in 17.3±4.3, 17.2±4.0 and 14.7±3.5 mins in group A, B and C respectively were achieved. Duration of analgesia was 176.5±53.5, 225.7±53.3 and 454.2±110.7 mins in group A, B and C respectively. Duration of analgesia in group C was statistically significant in comparison with other groups. The number of mean analgesic requirement by group C (0.9±0.4) was significantly (p- 0.005) lower. The mean VAS was significantly lower in group C in 12 hours post-operatively. Conclusion: The onsets of action, duration of analgesia were better in dexamethasone group and also need less number of rescue analgesics requirement. doi: 10.3126/kumj.v6i3.1704 Kathmandu University Medical Journal (2008), Vol. 6, No. 3, Issue 23, 302-309

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document