scholarly journals Research on Dispersive Discrimination Test Methods of Illite Clay Soils in Zhejiang

Author(s):  
Shihua CHEN ◽  
Shuijin SHEN ◽  
Yaohui HE ◽  
Qinghong MA
Author(s):  
W. F. Anderson ◽  
I. C. Pyrah ◽  
F. Haji-Ali

AbstractAlthough BS 5930:1981 describes both Menard and self-boring pressuremeter tests, little guidance is given on test methods. A number of techniques, both stress controlled and strain controlled, have been used and it has been shown that for clays the test technique has a significant influence on the derived strength and modulus parameters.When a pressuremeter test is carried out in a clay, it is assumed that shearing occurs under undrained conditions. However, in addition to immediate shear strain, some creep and local consolidation will occur in the soil around the expanding borehole. These two phenomena are time-dependent and variations in test technique will affect the test data and hence the derived strength and modulus values.To obtain a better understanding of these effects, pressuremeter tests have been studied both experimentally and numerically. Experimentally, pressuremeter tests have been simulated by expanding cylindrical cavities in samples of three clays prepared with known stress history and the results compared with numerical predictions where the effects of immediate shear, creep and consolidation can be separated. The experimental results compare well with the numerical predictions.This has given a new insight into the behaviour of clay soils during pressuremeter tests. The results indicate that any simple standardization of pressuremeter test technique should be approached with caution.


2019 ◽  
Vol 84 (3) ◽  
pp. 606-612
Author(s):  
David J. Bloom ◽  
Hwa-Young Baik ◽  
Soo-Yeun Lee

2001 ◽  
Vol 120 (5) ◽  
pp. A586-A587
Author(s):  
L BEST ◽  
S JO ◽  
V VANZANTEN ◽  
D HALDANE ◽  
V LOO ◽  
...  

1990 ◽  
Vol 64 (03) ◽  
pp. 478-484 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Exner ◽  
Douglas A Triplett ◽  
David A Taberner ◽  
Margaret A Howard ◽  
E Nigel Harris

SummarySix lyophilized plasma samples were sent to 20 “expert” laboratories for assessment of lupus anticoagulant (LA). Four samples contained pooled LA of graded potency mixed with aged normal plasma. One contained LA plus cephalin phospholipid and one contained a nonspecific venom anticoagulant. Sixteen methods were used overall with some participants using up to 8 methods. Results were scored in regard to the known potencies of LA in the samples and other known induced defects.Activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) tests used by most participants for preliminary screening were relatively sensitive, but non-specific. Platelet or phospholipid neutralization procedures (PNP) appeared to be sensitive and specific but showed a non-linear response to increased LA content. Kaolin clotting time (KCT) tests showed the most sensitive response to increased LA content but the weaker LA were not scored as abnormal by most laboratories as the samples may have contained platelet fragments. Other commonly used tests such as the tissue thromboplastin inhibition (TTI) test and the dilute Russell’s viper venom test (DRVVT) were carried out somewhat inconsistently. The variability in performance of tests in different laboratories indicates that standardization of methodology is urgently required.Generally it seemed that most clotting tests were “bypassed” by the addition of phospholipid to a known LA-positive sample in apparently direct proportion to their sensitivity. Sample preparation, especially prevention of contamination with activated platelets is a vital preliminary part in the assay of LA.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document