scholarly journals Influence of Carbon Management Accounting on Firm Value

Author(s):  
Andreas Guntara ◽  
Mimin Widaningsih
2020 ◽  
pp. 100933 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fereshteh Mahmoudian ◽  
Jing Lu ◽  
Dongning Yu ◽  
Jamal A. Nazari ◽  
Irene M. Herremans

2011 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 80-98 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roger L. Burritt ◽  
Stefan Schaltegger ◽  
Dimitar Zvezdov

2013 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 41-72
Author(s):  
Kanoknate Prempree ◽  
Phapruke Ussahawanitchakit ◽  
Sutana Boonlua

2014 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 71-92
Author(s):  
Wareewan Charoenroop ◽  
Phaprukbaramee Ussahawanitchakit ◽  
Suparak Janjarasjit

2020 ◽  
pp. 031289622091864 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bobae Choi ◽  
Le Luo ◽  
Pramila Shrestha

Using data on carbon emissions reported by Australian companies from 2009 to 2015, we examine the effect of carbon emissions on firm value. We investigate how the introduction of an Australian emissions pricing scheme, the Clean Energy Bill, affects this relationship. Results show that the level of direct emissions is negatively associated with a firm’s market value. The negative effect becomes stronger during the period when the Clean Energy Bill became effective. When firms are separated according to whether they provide voluntary carbon information in addition to their mandatory disclosures, negative effects of direct emissions are found in the group with low disclosure scores and in the group with poor carbon management performance. Overall, the results indicate that the market penalizes firms based on their direct carbon emissions and that this penalty is imposed only on firms that have low disclosure scores or poor carbon management performance. JEL Classification: M48, G32


AJAR ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (02) ◽  
pp. 110-132
Author(s):  
Ester Putri Gita Pratiwi ◽  
Dyna Rachmawati

The aim of this study is to test the implementation of environmental management accounting (EMA) on firm value indirectly through operational performance. EMA consists of Monetary Environmental Management Accounting (MEMA) and Physical Environmental Management Accounting (PEMA). This study uses 329 and 325 firm respectively for MEMA and PEMA. Research samples are manufacturing companies listed in Indonesian Stock Exchange during the period of 2017-2019. The results show that EMA, MEMA, and PEMA have no statistically effect on either to operational performance and firms’ value. It indicates that operational performance has no mediating role in the relationship between EMA and firm’s value. This study uses robustness test by replacing MEMA, PEMA with Environmental Quality Cost (EQC) approach as the measurement of EMA. EQC consists of prevention, detection, internal failure and external failure. The robustness test shows that EQC has positive impact on firms’ value indirectly through operational performance. It means that operational performance has mediating role in the relationship between EQC and firm’s value. This study contributes academically that EQC approach is the best measurement for EMA in manufacturing companies. Therefore, we suggest for the next study can adopt the EQC approach as the measurement of EMA.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document