scholarly journals Engaging the Solo Practitioner to Reduce Errors and Burnout

2020 ◽  
Vol 106 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-21
Author(s):  
Jimi Bush
Keyword(s):  
PEDIATRICS ◽  
1978 ◽  
Vol 61 (1) ◽  
pp. 158-159
Author(s):  
James M. San

I personally find the implications for the eventual eradication of varicella most exciting, as presented by Asano et al. (Pediatrics 59:3, January 1977). To safely prepare such a vaccine for mass use would surely require most stringent safeguards (more stringent than those used in the measles vaccine trials). Now, addressing myself to the comments of Dr. Brunell in the same issue (p. 1), I have a few observations from the standpoint of a solo practitioner of pediatrics for 27 years.


2007 ◽  
Vol 77 (5) ◽  
pp. 875-880 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott S. Heying ◽  
Jeryl D. English ◽  
Henry I. Bussa ◽  
John A. Corbett

Abstract Objective: To evaluate the financial success and personal satisfaction of orthodontists operating satellite practices. Materials and Methods: A questionnaire was e-mailed to 4426 members of the American Association of Orthodontists (AAO), and 817 completed surveys were returned, yielding an 18% response rate. Only replies from solo practitioner orthodontists were analyzed to limit variability among respondents. Results: Solo practitioner orthodontists with satellite practices reported an increase in net profit and started significantly more cases than orthodontists with one office. Yet, only 27% of respondents with one satellite and 48% of practitioners operating multiple satellites recommend opening a satellite practice. Ninety-two percent of orthodontists stated they were satisfied with the clinical aspects of their practice, and 99% of orthodontists described themselves as happy and satisfied individuals. Conclusion: Despite the ability of a satellite office to expand a patient base and increase net income, most practitioners would not encourage young orthodontists to establish a satellite office.


2010 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 341-352 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eduardo S. Paiva ◽  
Kim Dupree Jones

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Annapurna Poduri ◽  
Orrin Devinsky ◽  
Miriam Tabacinic ◽  
Alejandro R Jadad

UNSTRUCTURED Physician–patient collaboration was recognized as a critical core of participatory medicine more than a century ago. However, the subsequent focus on scientific research to enable cures and increased dominance of physicians in health care subordinated patients to a passive role. This paternalistic model weakened in the past 50 years—as women, minorities, and the disabled achieved greater rights, and as incurable chronic diseases and unrelieved pain disorders became more prevalent—promoting a more equitable role for physicians and patients. By 2000, a <i>shared decision-making model</i> became the pinnacle for clinical decisions, despite a dearth of data on health outcomes, or the model’s reliance on single patient or solo practitioner studies, or evidence that no single model could fit all clinical situations. We report about a young woman with intractable epilepsy due to a congenital brain malformation whose family and medical specialists used a <i>collaborative decision-making approach</i>. This model positioned the health professionals as supporters of the proactive family, and enabled them all to explore and co-create knowledge beyond the clinical realm. Together, they involved other members of the community in the decisions, while harnessing diverse relationships to allow all family members to achieve positive levels of health, despite the resistance of the seizures to medical treatment and the incurable nature of the underlying disease.


1998 ◽  
Vol 62 (2) ◽  
pp. 163-171 ◽  
Author(s):  
CA Cameron ◽  
SL Phillips ◽  
JE Chasteen

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document