Resin-modified glass ionomer cements: Fluoride release and uptake

1995 ◽  
Vol 53 (4) ◽  
pp. 222-225 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lennart Forsten
2004 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 12-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda Wang ◽  
Marília Afonso Rabelo Buzalaf ◽  
Maria Teresa Atta

A dhesive systems associated to resin-modified glass ionomer cements are employed for the achievement of a higher bond strength to dentin. Despite this benefit, other properties should not be damaged. This study aimed at evaluating the short-time fluoride release of a resin-modified glass ionomer cement coated with two one-bottle adhesive systems in a pH cycling system. Four combinations were investigated: G1: Vitremer (V); G2: Vitremer + Primer (VP); G3: Vitremer + Single Bond (VSB) and G4: Vitremer + Prime & Bond 2.1 (VPB). SB is a fluoride-free and PB is a fluoride-containing system. After preparation of the Vitremer specimens, two coats of the selected adhesive system were carefully applied and light-cured. Specimens were immersed in demineralizing solution for 6 hours followed by immersion in remineralizing solution for 18 hours, totalizing the 15-day cycle. All groups released fluoride in a similar pattern, with a greater release in the beginning and decreasing with time. VP showed the greatest fluoride release, followed by V, with no statistical difference. VSB and VPB released less fluoride compared to V and VP, with statistical difference. Regardless the one-bottle adhesive system, application of coating decreased the fluoride release from the resin-modified glass ionomer cements. This suggests that this combination would reduce the beneficial effect of the restorative material to the walls around the restoration.


2013 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 197 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mediha Selimović-Dragaš ◽  
Lajla Hasić-Branković ◽  
Fehim Korać ◽  
Nermin Đapo ◽  
Amina Huseinbegović ◽  
...  

Biomaterials ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 509-519 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronald M.H. Verbeeck ◽  
Erna A.P. De Maeyer ◽  
Luc A.M. Marks ◽  
Roeland J.G. De Moor ◽  
A.M.J.C. De Witte ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gilliard Lima Oliveira ◽  
Ceci Nunes Carvalho ◽  
Edilausson Moreno Carvalho ◽  
José Bauer ◽  
Adriana Mara Araújo Leal

Objective. To evaluate the compressive strength and fluoride ion release of conventional and resin-modified glass ionomer cement mixing methods (hand mix and mechanical mix) compared to ready-to-use ones. Materials and Methods. Two conventional glass ionomer cements (GICs) (Fuji II and Fuji II Caps), two resin-modified GICs (Fuji II LC and Fuji II L Caps), and one ready-to-use GIC (Ionoseal, Voco) were used. For the compressive strength test, cylindrical specimens (6 mm × 4 mm) of each group were prepared. The test was performed in a universal testing machine (EMIC DL2000). For the fluoride release test, specimens were prepared in the form of discs and placed in deionized/distilled water, which were replaced daily for 15 days. The fluoride ion release readings were performed on an electrode (Orion 96-09) connected to a digital ion analyzer (Quimis 0400ISE). The compressive strength data were analyzed with one-way ANOVA, and the ion release data were submitted to repeated measures ANOVA (material vs. time) and Holm–Sidak post test (α = 5%). Results. The one-way ANOVA showed statistical difference between the tested materials (p<0.001). Ionoseal showed the highest values of compressive strength (p<0.001). Mechanical manipulation increased the compressive strength only for conventional GIC, and resin-modified GIC did not present any statistical difference. Conventional GIC (mechanical mix) showed higher fluoride release on first day than the other groups tested. Conclusion. There was influence of the mixing methods of the materials on the compressive strength and fluoride release pattern of the glass ionomer cements.


Author(s):  
Gabriela Olmos‐Olmos ◽  
Bernardo Teutle‐Coyotecatl ◽  
Cristian D. Román‐Mendez ◽  
Rosendo Carrasco‐Gutiérrez ◽  
Maykel González‐Torres ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document