Effects of High-Pass Filtering on the Waveform and Threshold of Auditory Brainstem Responses to Tone Pips Answer to the comments of Dr. Kileny on the paper: 'Auditory Brainstem Responses to Middle- and Low-Frequency Tone Pips'

1986 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 124-128
Author(s):  
M. Maurizi ◽  
G. Paludetti ◽  
F. Ottaviani ◽  
M. Rosignoli
Keyword(s):  
Low Frequency ◽  
Auditory Brainstem ◽  
Auditory Brainstem Responses ◽  
Frequency Tone ◽  
High Pass

Auditory Brainstem Responses to Middle- and Low-Frequency Tone Pips

1984 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 75-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Maurizi ◽  
G. Paludetti ◽  
F. Ottaviani ◽  
M. Rosignoli
Keyword(s):  
Low Frequency ◽  
Auditory Brainstem ◽  
Auditory Brainstem Responses ◽  
Frequency Tone

scholarly journals Aerial low-frequency hearing in captive and free-ranging harbour seals (Phoca vitulina) measured using auditory brainstem responses

2016 ◽  
Vol 202 (12) ◽  
pp. 859-868 ◽  
Author(s):  
Klaus Lucke ◽  
Gordon D. Hastie ◽  
Kerstin Ternes ◽  
Bernie McConnell ◽  
Simon Moss ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Low Frequency ◽  
Auditory Brainstem ◽  
Phoca Vitulina ◽  
Auditory Brainstem Responses ◽  
Harbour Seals ◽  
Free Ranging

scholarly journals Auditory Brainstem Responses in Cases with Sensorineural Hearing Loss in Low Frequency Tones.

1994 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
pp. 136-141
Author(s):  
Toshifumi Sakata ◽  
Akihide Imamura ◽  
Nobuhide Imamura ◽  
Yuji Suoya ◽  
Kimio Shiraishi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Sensorineural Hearing Loss ◽  
Low Frequency ◽  
Auditory Brainstem ◽  
Sensorineural Hearing ◽  
Auditory Brainstem Responses

Bone conduction auditory brainstem responses in infants

2004 ◽  
Vol 118 (2) ◽  
pp. 117-122 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. E. Campbell ◽  
C. M. Harris ◽  
S. Hendricks ◽  
T. Sirimanna
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Dynamic Range ◽  
Bone Conduction ◽  
Low Frequency ◽  
Paediatric Population ◽  
Auditory Brainstem ◽  
Sensorineural Hearing ◽  
Auditory Brainstem Responses ◽  
Brainstem Response ◽  
Narrow Dynamic Range

The contribution of air conduction auditory brainstem response (AC-ABR) testing in the paediatric population is widely accepted in clinical audiology. However, this does not allow for differentiation between conductive and sensorineural hearing loss. The purpose ofthis paper is to review the role of bone conduction auditory brainstem responses (BC-ABR). It is argued that despite such technical difficulties as a narrow dynamic range, masking dilemmas, stimulus artifact and low frequency underestimation of hearing loss, considerable evidence exists to suggest that BC-ABR testing provides an important contribution in the accurate assessmentof hearing loss in infants. Modification of the BC-ABR protocol is discussed and the technical difficulties that may arise are addressed, permitting BC-ABR to be used as a tool in the differential diagnosis between conductive and sensorineural hearing. Two relevant case studies are presented to highlight the growing importance of appropriate management in early identification of hearing loss. It can be concluded that BC-ABR should be adopted as a routine clinical diagnostic tool.

scholarly journals Lack of Diagnostic Value of High-Pass Noise Masking of Auditory Brainstem Responses in M??ni??re's Disease

2007 ◽  
Vol PAP ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudia F. J. De Valck ◽  
Gerd M. E. Claes ◽  
Floris L. Wuyts ◽  
Paul H. Van de Heyning
Keyword(s):  
Diagnostic Value ◽  
Auditory Brainstem ◽  
Auditory Brainstem Responses ◽  
Noise Masking ◽  
High Pass
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document