scholarly journals Phase III, multicenter, open-label, long-term study of the safety of abatacept in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to conventional or biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs

2014 ◽  
Vol 24 (5) ◽  
pp. 744-753 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tsutomu Takeuchi ◽  
Tsukasa Matsubara ◽  
Yukitomo Urata ◽  
Eiichi Suematsu ◽  
Shuji Ohta ◽  
...  
2013 ◽  
Vol 40 (5) ◽  
pp. 599-604 ◽  
Author(s):  
William F.C. Rigby ◽  
Philip J. Mease ◽  
Ewa Olech ◽  
Mark Ashby ◽  
Swati Tole

Objective.To characterize the safety of rituximab (RTX) in combination with biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).Methods.We did an open-label study of the safety and efficacy of RTX in adult patients with active RA and an inadequate response to ≥ 1 biologic for ≥ 12 weeks (stable dose ≥ 4 weeks). RTX (2 × 500 mg) was added to patients’ current biologic and nonbiologic DMARD treatment. After 24 weeks, patients with 28-joint Disease Activity Score ≥ 2.6 were eligible for RTX retreatment. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients developing a serious adverse event (SAE) within 24 weeks of initiating RTX.Results.Patients (n = 176) received RTX with 18 different biologic/DMARD combinations. Adalimumab alone (n = 46; 26.1%) or etanercept alone (n = 37; 21.0%) plus RTX were the most common combinations. Overall, 90.9% and 76.1% of patients completed 24 and 48 weeks, respectively; 147 patients (83.5%) received a second course of RTX. Over 24 weeks, 9.1% of patients reported SAE (24.3 events/100 patient-yrs, 95% CI 15.5–38.1). The SAE rate was similar over 48 weeks (22.4 events/100 patient-yrs, 95% CI 15.9–31.5). Four serious infections were reported over 48 weeks (2.7 events/100 patient-yrs, 95% CI 1.0–7.2). No SAE occurred within 24 h of any RTX infusion. Efficacy responses improved numerically at Week 48 compared with Week 24.Conclusion.The overall safety profile of RTX in combination with 1 other biologic was consistent with that previously reported for RTX plus methotrexate or other nonbiologic DMARD. (Clinicaltrials.govNCT00443651)


Rheumatology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Josef S Smolen ◽  
Li Xie ◽  
Bochao Jia ◽  
Peter C Taylor ◽  
Gerd Burmester ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective To evaluate the long-term efficacy of once-daily baricitinib 4 mg in patients with active RA who were either naïve to DMARDs or who had inadequate response (IR) to MTX. Methods Analyses of data from two completed 52-week, phase III studies, RA-BEGIN (DMARD-naïve) and RA-BEAM (MTX-IR), and one ongoing long-term extension (LTE) study (RA-BEYOND) were performed (148 total weeks). At week 52, DMARD-naïve patients treated with MTX monotherapy or baricitinib 4 mg+MTX in RA-BEGIN were switched to open-label baricitinib 4 mg monotherapy; MTX-IR patients treated with adalimumab (+MTX) in RA-BEAM were switched to open-label baricitinib 4 mg (+MTX) in the LTE. Patients who received placebo (+MTX) were switched to baricitinib 4 mg (+MTX) at week 24. Low disease activity (LDA) [Simple Disease Activity Index (SDAI) ≤11], clinical remission (SDAI ≤ 3.3), and physical functioning [Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) ≤ 0.5] were assessed. Data were assessed using a non-responder imputation. Results At week 148, SDAI LDA was achieved in up to 61% of DMARD-naïve patients and 59% of MTX-IR patients initially treated with baricitinib, and SDAI remission was achieved in up to 34% of DMARD-naïve patients and 24% of MTX-IR patients; HAQ-DI ≤ 0.5 was reached in up to 48% of DMARD-naïve patients and 38% of MTX-IR patients initially treated with baricitinib. Over 148 weeks, 3.6% and 10.7% of MTX-IR patients discontinued across treatment groups due to lack of efficacy or due to adverse events, respectively; discontinuation rates were similar in the DMARD-naïve population. Conclusion Treatment with baricitinib 4 mg demonstrated efficacy for up to 3 years and was well tolerated.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document