A comparison of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions and automated auditory brainstem responses for pre-discharge neonatal hearing screening: Comparación de los emisiones otoacústicas evocadas portransitorios y los potenciales evocados automatizados de tallo cerebral en la identificación auditiva neonatal de pre-egreso hospitalario

2003 ◽  
Vol 42 (8) ◽  
pp. 443-447 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Clarke ◽  
Mohammed Iqbal ◽  
Simon Mitchell
2004 ◽  
Vol 15 (06) ◽  
pp. 414-425 ◽  
Author(s):  
James W. Hall ◽  
Steven D. Smith ◽  
Gerald R. Popelka

Accurate assessment of neonatal hearing screening performance is impossible without knowledge of the true status of hearing, a prohibitive requirement that necessitates a complete diagnostic evaluation on all babies screened. The purpose of this study was to circumvent this limitation by integrating two types of screening measures obtained near simultaneously on every baby. Peripheral auditory function was defined by otoacoustic emission results. A complete diagnostic evaluation was performed on every baby who received a "Refer" outcome for auditory brainstem response screening. The integrated results for auditory brainstem response screening in an unselected group of 300 newborns estimated sensitivity at 100%, specificity at 99.7%, overall referral rate at 2.0%, and a positive predictive value of 83.3%. Conductive loss associated with amniotic fluid in the middle ear can persist several weeks after birth; conductive loss can produce a "Refer" outcome for auditory brainstem response screening; and auditory neuropathy can be detected with screening measures. Prevalence results were consistent with the published literature. The implications of this study are that otoacoustic emissions and auditory brainstem measures provide much more information than either alone and that both are needed for a comprehensive hearing screening program.


2011 ◽  
Vol 125 (9) ◽  
pp. 911-916 ◽  
Author(s):  
B Rana ◽  
A Barman

AbstractObjective:To investigate the correlation between cochlear processing and brainstem processing.Method:Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions and speech-evoked auditory brainstem responses were recorded in 40 ears of normal-hearing individuals aged 18 to 23 years. Correlation analyses compared transient evoked otoacoustic emission parameters with speech-evoked auditory brainstem response parameters.Results:There was a significant correlation between speech-evoked auditory brainstem response wave V latency and transient evoked otoacoustic emission global emission strength; there were no other significant correlations between the two tests.Conclusion:Tests for transient evoked otoacoustic emissions and speech-evoked auditory brainstem responses provide unique and functionally independent information about the integrity and sensitivity of the auditory system. Therefore, combining both tests will provide a more sensitive clinical battery with which to identify the location of different disorders (e.g. language-based learning impairments and hearing impairments).


1999 ◽  
Vol 38 (6) ◽  
pp. 296-302 ◽  
Author(s):  
Geert De Ceulaer ◽  
Kristin Daemers ◽  
Kristin Van Driessche ◽  
Steven Marien ◽  
Thomas Somers ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document