Effects of Rigid and Dynamic Ankle-Foot Orthoses on Normal Gait

2009 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-56 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bastien Guillebastre ◽  
Paul Calmels ◽  
Patrice Rougier
2010 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 254-269 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elaine Owen

This paper reviews and summarizes the evidence for important observations of normal and pathological gait and presents an approach to rehabilitation and orthotic management, which is based on the significance of shank and thigh kinematics for standing and gait. It discusses normal gait biomechanics, challenging some traditional beliefs, the interrelationship between segment kinematics, joint kinematics and kinetics and their relationship to orthotic design, alignment and tuning. It proposes a description of four rather than three rockers in gait; a simple categorization of pathological gait based on shank kinematics abnormality; an algorithm for the designing, aligning and tuning of AFO-Footwear Combinations; and an algorithm for determining the sagittal angle of the ankle in an AFO. It reports the results of research on Shank to Vertical Angle alignment of tuned AFO-Footwear Combinations and on the use of ‘point loading’ rocker soles.


Author(s):  
Niels F. J. Waterval ◽  
Merel-Anne Brehm ◽  
Jaap Harlaar ◽  
Frans Nollet

Abstract Background In people with calf muscle weakness, the stiffness of dorsal leaf spring ankle–foot orthoses (DLS-AFO) needs to be individualized to maximize its effect on walking. Orthotic suppliers may recommend a certain stiffness based on body weight and activity level. However, it is unknown whether these recommendations are sufficient to yield the optimal stiffness for the individual. Therefore, we assessed whether the stiffness following the supplier’s recommendation of the Carbon Ankle7 (CA7) dorsal leaf matched the experimentally optimized AFO stiffness. Methods Thirty-four persons with calf muscle weakness were included and provided a new DLS-AFO of which the stiffness could be varied by changing the CA7® (Ottobock, Duderstadt, Germany) dorsal leaf. For five different stiffness levels, including the supplier recommended stiffness, gait biomechanics, walking energy cost and speed were assessed. Based on these measures, the individual experimentally optimal AFO stiffness was selected. Results In only 8 of 34 (23%) participants, the supplier recommended stiffness matched the experimentally optimized AFO stiffness, the latter being on average 1.2 ± 1.3 Nm/degree more flexible. The DLS-AFO with an experimentally optimized stiffness resulted in a significantly lower walking energy cost (− 0.21 ± 0.26 J/kg/m, p < 0.001) and a higher speed (+ 0.02 m/s, p = 0.003). Additionally, a larger ankle range of motion (+ 1.3 ± 0.3 degrees, p < 0.001) and higher ankle power (+ 0.16 ± 0.04 W/kg, p < 0.001) were found with the experimentally optimized stiffness compared to the supplier recommended stiffness. Conclusions In people with calf muscle weakness, current supplier’s recommendations for the CA7 stiffness level result in the provision of DLS-AFOs that are too stiff and only achieve 80% of the reduction in energy cost achieved with an individual optimized stiffness. It is recommended to experimentally optimize the CA7 stiffness in people with calf muscle weakness in order to maximize treatment outcomes. Trial registration Nederlands Trial Register 5170. Registration date: May 7th 2015. http://www.trialregister.nl/trialreg/admin/rctview.asp?TC=5170.


2015 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 427-441 ◽  
Author(s):  
Feng Tian ◽  
Mohamed Samir Hefzy ◽  
Mohammad Elahinia

2014 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 46-52 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrik Kutilek ◽  
Vladimir Socha ◽  
Slavka Viteckova ◽  
Zdenek Svoboda

2009 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 225-234 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tara O’Reilly ◽  
Adrienne Hunt ◽  
Bronwyn Thomas ◽  
Lynne Harris ◽  
Joshua Burns

2001 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 74-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adrian A. Polliack ◽  
Christopher Swanson ◽  
Samuel E. Landsberger ◽  
Donald R. McNeal

2011 ◽  
Vol 39 (12) ◽  
pp. 2679-2685 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca S. Kearney ◽  
Sarah E. Lamb ◽  
Juul Achten ◽  
Nicholas R. Parsons ◽  
Matthew L. Costa

Background: Advances in the management of Achilles tendon rupture have led to the development of immediate weightbearing protocols. These vary regarding which ankle-foot orthoses (AFOs) are used and the number of inserted heel wedges used within them. Purpose: This study was conducted to evaluate plantar pressure measurements and temporal gait parameters within different AFOs, using different numbers of heel wedges. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Fifteen healthy participants were evaluated using 3 different AFOs, with 4 different levels of inserted heel wedges. Therefore, a total of 12 conditions were evaluated, in a sequence that was randomly allocated to each participant. Pressure and temporal gait parameters were measured using an in-shoe F-Scan pressure system, and range of movement was measured using an electrogoniometer. Results: Ankle-foot orthoses that were restrictive in design, combined with a higher number of inserted heel wedges, reduced forefoot pressures, increased heel pressures, and decreased the amount of time spent in the terminal stance and preswing phase of the gait cycle ( P = .029, .002, and .001). Conclusion: The choice of AFO design and the number of inserted heel wedges have a significant effect on plantar pressure measurements and temporal gait parameters. The implications of these changes need to be applied to the clinical management of acute Achilles tendon ruptures. This clinical management requires a balance between protected weightbearing and functional loading, requiring further research within a clinical context. Clinical Relevance: The biomechanical data from this research imply that a carbon-fiber AFO, with 1 heel raise, protects against excessive dorsiflexion while facilitating the restoration of near-normal gait parameters. This could lead to an accelerated return to function, avoiding the effects of disuse atrophy. This is in contrast to the rigid rocker-bottom AFO design with a greater number of heel-wedge inserts. However, research within a clinical context would be required to ascertain if these biomechanical advantages translate into a functional benefit for patients. The results should also be considered in relation to the amount of force a healing Achilles tendon can withstand.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document