scholarly journals Transcranial direct current stimulation above the medial prefrontal cortex counteracts the effects of diminished outcome controllability during reinforcement learning

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gábor Csifcsák ◽  
Jorunn Bjørkøy ◽  
Sarjo Kuyateh ◽  
Haakon Reithe ◽  
Matthias Mittner

Background: The arbitration between decision-making strategies is shaped by the degree of controllability over environmental events. Under low control, individuals might rely more heavily on Pavlovian bias (PB), which facilitates and inhibits actions when facing appetitive and aversive cues, respectively. More recently, extreme PB was implicated in learned helplessness (LH), which is typically induced by uncontrollable punishment. On the neural level, the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) was pinpointed as a region underlying both cognitive control over PB, and the pathogenesis of LH.Objective/Hypothesis: To test if high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) targeting the mPFC counteracts with the deleterious behavioral effects of low controllability over rewards/losses (“yoking”) during reinforcement learning.Methods: In a pre-registered, between-group, double-blind study (N = 103, healthy adults), we tested the interaction of low controllability and HD-tDCS on performance in a Go/NoGo task. Yoking was implemented by presenting random outcomes following responses, while matching reward/loss frequencies between control and yoked groups. HD-tDCS was delivered for 15 minutes at 2 mA using a 4x1 montage centered at position Fz.Results: HD-tDCS improved response accuracy by the end of the task only when applied simultaneously with yoking. The beneficial consequences of active stimulation in yoked participants were more pronounced in reward-predictive trials. Finally, computational modeling revealed that parameter estimates of learning rate and choice randomness were modulated by yoking and HD-tDCS in an interactive manner.Conclusions: These results highlight the potential of our HD-tDCS protocol for interfering with choice arbitration in volatile environments, resulting in more adaptive behavior.

2016 ◽  
Vol 22 (9) ◽  
pp. 928-936 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Doppelmayr ◽  
Nils Henrik Pixa ◽  
Fabian Steinberg

AbstractObjectives: Although motor adaptation is a highly relevant process for both everyday life as well as rehabilitation many details of this process are still unresolved. To evaluate the contribution of primary motor (M1), parietal and cerebellar areas to motor adaptation processes transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been applied. We hypothesized that anodal stimulation of the cerebellum and the M1 improves the learning process in mirror drawing, a task involving fine grained and spatially well-organized hand movements. Methods: High definition tDCS (HD-tDCS) allows a focal stimulation to modulate brain processes. In a single-session double-blind study, we compared the effects of different anodal stimulation procedures. The groups received stimulation either at the cerebellum (CER), at right parietal (PAR), or at left M1, and a SHAM group was included. Participants (n=83) had to complete several mirror drawing tasks before, during, and after stimulation. They were instructed to re-trace a line in the shape of a pentagonal star as fast and accurate as possible. Tracing time (seconds) and accuracy (deviation in mm) have been evaluated. Results: The results indicated that cerebellar HD-tDCS can facilitate motor adaptation in a single session. The stimulation at M1 showed only a tendency to increase motor adaptation and these effects were visible only during the first part of the stimulation. Stimulating the right parietal area, relevant for visuospatial processing did not lead to increased performance. Conclusions: Our results suggest that motor adaptation relies to a great extent on cerebellar functions and HD-tDCS can speed up this process. (JINS, 2016, 22, 928–936)


2013 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
pp. 946-951 ◽  
Author(s):  
Riccardo Russo ◽  
Denise Wallace ◽  
Paul B. Fitzgerald ◽  
Nicholas R. Cooper

2016 ◽  
Vol 123 (10) ◽  
pp. 1179-1194 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ester Miyuki Nakamura-Palacios ◽  
Isabela Bittencourt Coutinho Lopes ◽  
Rodolpho Albuquerque Souza ◽  
Jaisa Klauss ◽  
Edson Kruger Batista ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document