scholarly journals Empirical Progeny Equivalent of Genotyped Animals in a Multi-breed Beef Cattle Genetic Evaluation Using a Single-step Bayesian Regression Model

Author(s):  
Mahdi Saatchi ◽  
Rohan L. Fernando ◽  
Lauren Hyde ◽  
Jackie Atkins ◽  
Steve McGuire ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 51 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Vinzent Boerner ◽  
David J. Johnston

Abstract Multi-trait single step genetic evaluation is increasingly facing the situation of having more individuals with genotypes than markers within each genotype. This creates a situation where the genomic relationship matrix ($$\mathbf{G }$$ G ) is not of full rank and its inversion is algebraically impossible. Recently, the SS-T-BLUP method was proposed as a modified version of the single step equations, providing an elegant way to circumvent the inversion of the $$\mathbf{G }$$ G and therefore accommodate the situation described. SS-T-BLUP uses the Woodbury matrix identity, thus it requires an add-on matrix, which is usually the covariance matrix of the residual polygenic effet. In this paper, we examine the application of SS-T-BLUP to a large-scale multi-trait Australian Angus beef cattle dataset using the full BREEDPLAN single step genetic evaluation model and compare the results to the application of two different methods of using $$\mathbf{G }$$ G in a single step model. Results clearly show that SS-T-BLUP outperforms other single step formulations in terms of computational speed and avoids approximation of the inverse of $$\mathbf{G }$$ G .


2016 ◽  
Vol 94 (suppl_5) ◽  
pp. 144-145
Author(s):  
D. A. L. Lourenco ◽  
S. Tsuruta ◽  
B. D. Fragomeni ◽  
Y. Masuda ◽  
I. Pocrnic ◽  
...  

Genes ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 266
Author(s):  
Hossein Mehrban ◽  
Masoumeh Naserkheil ◽  
Deuk Hwan Lee ◽  
Chungil Cho ◽  
Taejeong Choi ◽  
...  

The weighted single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) method has been proposed to exploit information from genotyped and non-genotyped relatives, allowing the use of weights for single-nucleotide polymorphism in the construction of the genomic relationship matrix. The purpose of this study was to investigate the accuracy of genetic prediction using the following single-trait best linear unbiased prediction methods in Hanwoo beef cattle: pedigree-based (PBLUP), un-weighted (ssGBLUP), and weighted (WssGBLUP) single-step genomic methods. We also assessed the impact of alternative single and window weighting methods according to their effects on the traits of interest. The data was comprised of 15,796 phenotypic records for yearling weight (YW) and 5622 records for carcass traits (backfat thickness: BFT, carcass weight: CW, eye muscle area: EMA, and marbling score: MS). Also, the genotypic data included 6616 animals for YW and 5134 for carcass traits on the 43,950 single-nucleotide polymorphisms. The ssGBLUP showed significant improvement in genomic prediction accuracy for carcass traits (71%) and yearling weight (99%) compared to the pedigree-based method. The window weighting procedures performed better than single SNP weighting for CW (11%), EMA (11%), MS (3%), and YW (6%), whereas no gain in accuracy was observed for BFT. Besides, the improvement in accuracy between window WssGBLUP and the un-weighted method was low for BFT and MS, while for CW, EMA, and YW resulted in a gain of 22%, 15%, and 20%, respectively, which indicates the presence of relevant quantitative trait loci for these traits. These findings indicate that WssGBLUP is an appropriate method for traits with a large quantitative trait loci effect.


2011 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 185-201 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriel Nuñez-Antonio ◽  
Eduardo Gutiérrez-Peña ◽  
Gabriel Escarela

2018 ◽  
Vol 96 (10) ◽  
pp. 4076-4086
Author(s):  
Justin W Buchanan ◽  
Michael D MacNeil ◽  
Randall C Raymond ◽  
Ashley R Nilles ◽  
Alison Louise Van Eenennaam

2004 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 517-521 ◽  
Author(s):  
José Elivalto Guimarães Campêlo ◽  
Paulo Sávio Lopes ◽  
Robledo de Almeida Torres ◽  
Luiz Otávio Campos da Silva ◽  
Ricardo Frederico Euclydes ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document