Visual acuity after intravitreal triamcinolone for diabetic macular edema refractory to laser treatment: A meta-analysis

2009 ◽  
Vol 44 (5) ◽  
pp. 587-593 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher J. Rudnisky ◽  
Valery Lavergne ◽  
David Katz
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Macular Edema ◽  
Laser Treatment ◽  
Diabetic Macular Edema ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Intravitreal Triamcinolone

Current Therapy of Diabetic Macular Edema Bevacizumab, Triamcinolone Acetonide, and Laser Photocoagulation

2019 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 13
Author(s):  
Gladys Kusumowidagdo ◽  
Randy Sarayar ◽  
Kartika Rahayu ◽  
Gitalisa Andayani
Keyword(s):  
Macular Edema ◽  
Triamcinolone Acetonide ◽  
Diabetic Macular Edema ◽  
Systematic Reviews ◽  
Laser Photocoagulation ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Intravitreal Bevacizumab ◽  
Current Therapy ◽  
Intravitreal Triamcinolone ◽  
Mesh Terms

Background: Diabetic macular edema (DME) is the main cause of visual impairment in diabetic retinopathy (DR). Current gold standard therapy of DME is macular laser photocoagulation (MPC). Growing evidences have shown benefits of intravitreal anti-VEGF agents (i.e bevacizumab) and intravitreal corticosteroids (i.e triamcinolone acetonide). Aim: To compare the visual acuity (VA) improvement of patients with DME, treated with intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB), a combination of IVB and intravitreal triamcinolone (IVB/IVT), and MPC. Method: A comprehensive PubMed® and Cochrane® databases search was conducted on May 4th, 2017 using appropriate keywords (diabetic macular edema, bevacizumab, triamcinolone, and laser photocoagulation using their MeSH terms). Studies were filtered using inclusion criterions (clinical trials, RCT, meta-analysis, systematic review, English, humans, and publication within 10 years) Results: Three studies (2 systematic reviews and 1 RCT) were found suitable. From these results, all studies showed favoring effects of IVB when compared to IVB/IVT combination and MPC in short term period (up to 6 months). However, there was no significant improvement of VA beyond this period in all groups. Conclusion: IVB appears to be superior to IVB/IVT and MPC in improving VA during 6 months follow- up period. Future systematic reviews and meta-analysis are required on the effect of IVB and MPC combination in cases of DME.

scholarly journals EFFICACY OF INTRAVITREAL TRIAMCINOLONE ACETONIDE FOR DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA

2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 30-34
Author(s):  
Prachand Gautam ◽  
Koshal Shrestha ◽  
Gyanendra Lamichhane ◽  
Sushila Patel
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Intraocular Pressure ◽  
Macular Edema ◽  
Triamcinolone Acetonide ◽  
Diabetic Macular Edema ◽  
Intravitreal Triamcinolone ◽  
Hard Exudates ◽  
Intravitreal Triamcinolone Acetonide ◽  
Diffuse Diabetic Macular Edema

INTRODUCTION: Diabetic retionopathy is a microangilpathy. The present study was done to investigate results of Intravitreal Triamcinolone Acetonide injection for the treatment diffuse diabetic macular edema. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study included 40 eyes of 40 patients with clinically significant diffuse diabetic macular edema. Eyes were diagnosed with diabetic macular edema according to Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study guidelines. An Intravitreal injection of Triamcinolone Acetonide at the dose of 4 mg/0.2 ml was administered. Best corrected visual acuity was measured as the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) and snellen vision drum and size of macular edema (hard exudates) was obtained by slit lamp biomicroscopy using +90 D Volk lens at each visit. Intraocular pressure (IOP) and other complications related with steroid and injection related complications were also evaluated. Subsequently patients were followed up on 1st day, 2nd week and 3rd month. RESULTS: All patients were completed second follow up at 3 months. The mean size of macular edema, which obtained at 3 months postoperatively, was significantly different from the baseline measurement from 1.4125 to 0.9474 DD. Mean visual acuity improved significantly from baseline at 3 months of follow up was 0.7421 LogMAR (≈ 6/30 in Snellen chart). Eleven eyes developed intraocular pressure higher than 21 mmHg at 2nd week postoperatively. Other drug and injection related complications were not developed. Increased IOP were controlled with anti glaucoma drugs. CONCLUSIONS: Intravitreal Triamcinolone was a promising therapeutic method for diabetic macular edema. TriamcinoloneAcetonide effectively reduces size of macular edema and improves visual acuity in the short term.Journal of Universal College of Medical Sciences (2015) Vol.03 No.02 Issue 10 Page: 30-34

scholarly journals Intravitreal bevacizumab injection alone or combined with macular photocoagulation compared to macular photocoagulation as primary treatment of diabetic macular edema

2015 ◽  
Vol 72 (10) ◽  
pp. 876-882 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandra Jovanovic ◽  
Vladimir Canadanovic ◽  
Ana Sabo ◽  
Zorka Grgic ◽  
Milena Mitrovic ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Macular Edema ◽  
Laser Treatment ◽  
Diabetic Macular Edema ◽  
Combined Treatment ◽  
Intravitreal Bevacizumab ◽  
Primary Treatment ◽  
Intravitreal Bevacizumab Injection ◽  
Vegf Inhibitor ◽  
The Mean

Background/Aim. Within diabetic retinopathy (DR), diabetic macular edema (DME) is one of the leading causes of the loss of visual acuity. The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of the intravitreal vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitor application alone or combined with macular focal/grid lasephotocoagulation compared with laser treatment alone. Methods. This prospective randomized clinical trial included 72 patients (120 treated eyes) with varying degrees of DR and DME. The DME treatment included intravitreal VEGF inhibitor bevacizumab (Avastin?) application, with and without laser treatment. Bevacizumab (1.25 mg/0.05 mL) was administered intravitreally in 4-6-week intervals. Laser is applied 4-6 weeks after last dose of the drug as a part of combined treatment, or as the primary treatment. Results. The mean reduction in central macular thickness (CMT) for the eyes (n = 31) treated with bevacizumab alone was 162.23 ?m, for the eyes (n = 53) treated with combined treatment the mean reduction in CMT was 124.24 ?m, both statistically significant at p < 0.001. Laser macular photocolagulation as a part of combined treatment (in 53 eyes) significantly contributed to the CMT reduction, based on the paired t-test results (366.28 vs 323.0 ?m at p < 0.05). In our study, the mean visual acuity improvement of 0.161 logMAR was achieved in the group of eyes treated with bevacizumab alone, and 0.093 logMAR in the group with combined treatment, both statistically significant at p < 0.05. The effect of laser photocolagulation alone on visual acuity and CMT was not statistically significant. Conclusion. Treatment with bevacizumab alone or within combined treatment is more effective in treating DME than conventional macular laser treatment alone, both anatomically and functionally.

scholarly journals Alone laser versus bevacizumab plus laser for diffuse diabetic macular edema (ALBA randomized trial)

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. 251584142098821
Author(s):  
Alicia Pareja-Ríos ◽  
Elena de Armas-Ramos ◽  
Ana Aldea-Perona ◽  
Sergio Bonaque-González
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Macular Edema ◽  
Laser Treatment ◽  
Diabetic Macular Edema ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Intravitreal Bevacizumab ◽  
Clinical Trial Registry ◽  
Diffuse Diabetic Macular Edema ◽  
Related Quality ◽  
Health Related

Purpose: To report the 12-month results of laser (treatment G1) versus intravitreal bevacizumab combined with laser (treatment G2) in patients with diffuse diabetic macular edema (DME). Methods: In this single-center randomized independent controlled trial, 32 patients were randomized to G1 ( n = 15) or G2 ( n = 17). In G1, laser was given at baseline and then pro re nata (PRN). In G2, three intravitreal bevacizumab (1.25 mg) injections were given once every 6 weeks, then laser and then PRN. Analysis was performed by treatment as administered. This study was registered in clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01572350 and EU Clinical Trial Registry as 2009-014654-15. Results: G2 was superior to G1 improving best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) with respect baseline (+8.0 vs + 3.0; p < 0.01). At month 12, a significantly greater proportion of patients had a BCVA letter score >15 and >73 in G2 (3 of 15 (20%) and 8 of 15 (53%), respectively) versus G1 (1 of 17 (6%) and 4 of 18 (23%), respectively). Health-related quality of life, assessed through National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire, at 12 months was statistically indistinguishable between both groups. Conclusion: G2 provided superior visual acuity gains over G1 in patients with visual impairment due to center-involving diffuse DME, associated with significant gains in VFQ-25 scores.

Intravitreal Triamcinolone Prior to Laser Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema

Ophthalmology ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (5) ◽  
pp. 866-872 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark C. Gillies ◽  
Ian L. McAllister ◽  
Meidong Zhu ◽  
Wanling Wong ◽  
Damien Louis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Macular Edema ◽  
Laser Treatment ◽  
Diabetic Macular Edema ◽  
Intravitreal Triamcinolone
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document