1. Gender and the Political Economy of the Welfare State: Theoretical Considerations

2003 ◽  
1983 ◽  
Vol 98 (4) ◽  
pp. 734
Author(s):  
John B. Williamson ◽  
Thomas Wilson ◽  
Dorothy J. Wilson

1981 ◽  
Vol 68 (1) ◽  
pp. 171
Author(s):  
Stuart D. Brandes ◽  
Edward Berkowitz ◽  
Kim McQuaid

1986 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 315-335 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Carrier ◽  
Ian Kendall

ABSTRACTMarxist accounts of welfare have been characterized by a critical view of social administration and an uncritical view of the concept of the ‘welfare state’. In this paper both these views are questioned. We explore the problems associated with basing analyses of welfare on the ‘welfare state’ and the limitations of certain criticisms of the ‘social administration tradition’. We conclude that whatever the merits of the more substantive elements in Marxist accounts of welfare, there are problems associated with their assumptions about social administration and the ‘welfare state’.


2004 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 747-748
Author(s):  
Candace Johnson

Gendered States: Women, Unemployment Insurance, and the Political Economy of the Welfare State in Canada, 1945–1997, Ann Porter, Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2003, pp. 355It is amazing that Canadian society has been consistently bewildered as to the social, political and economic placement of women. In her new book, Ann Porter explains that the labour requirement that enabled women's participation in the workforce during the Second World War created a post-war environment that was inequitable, illogical, gendered, and “regulating.” Thus, progressive measures were to produce regressive results, as they were taken for the sake of nationalism and not gender equality. Porter documents the change in Unemployment Insurance (UI) policy from limited coverage for certain groups of male workers that could not engage in productive labour to “site of contestation over women's entitlement to state benefits” (66).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document