Chiropractic Care Plus Physiotherapy Compared to Physiotherapy Alone in Chronic Stroke Patients: a Pilot Study

Author(s):  
2018 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-52 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Mazzoleni ◽  
E. Battini ◽  
R. Crecchi ◽  
P. Dario ◽  
F. Posteraro

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (6) ◽  
pp. 675-682 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne Barzel ◽  
Joachim Liepert ◽  
Kerstin Haevernick ◽  
Marion Eisele ◽  
Gesche Ketels ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 07 (02) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shujuan Pan ◽  
Dahlia Kairy ◽  
Helene Corriveau ◽  
Michel Tousignant

Author(s):  
Giulia Lioi ◽  
Simon Butet ◽  
Mathis Fleury ◽  
Elise Bannier ◽  
Anatole Lécuyer ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 292-299 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julien Boudarham ◽  
Nicolas Roche ◽  
Mickael Teixeira ◽  
Sophie Hameau ◽  
Johanna Robertson ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 26 (8) ◽  
pp. 686-695 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naoki Tanaka ◽  
Hideyuki Saitou ◽  
Toshifumi Takao ◽  
Noboru Iizuka ◽  
Junko Okuno ◽  
...  

Objective: We developed a footpad-type locomotion interface called the GaitMaster. The purpose of this pilot study was to examine the effects of gait rehabilitation using the GaitMaster in chronic stroke patients. Design: Randomized cross-over design. Setting: An outpatient department. Subjects: Twelve patients with chronic post-stroke hemiparesis. Intervention: In group A, patients underwent an ‘intervention phase’ followed by a ‘non-intervention phase’, whereas in group B, patients underwent the non-intervention phase first, followed by the intervention phase. In the four- or six-week intervention phase, participants underwent twelve 20-minute sessions of gait rehabilitation using the GaitMaster4. Main outcome measures: We measured gait speed and timed up-and-go test. Results: No differences between the two groups were observed in the baseline clinical data. For the combined groups A and B, the maximum gait and timed up-and-go test speeds improved significantly only in the intervention phase ( P = 0.0001 and P = 0.003, respectively). The percentages of improvement from baseline at the end of GaitMaster training were 16.6% for the maximum gait speed and 8.3% for the timed up-and-go test. The effect size for GaitMaster4 training was 0.58 on the maximum gait speed and 0.43 on the timed up-and-go test. Conclusions: This pilot study showed that gait rehabilitation using the GaitMaster4 was a feasible training method for chronic stroke patients. Calculation of the sample size indicated that a sample size of 38 participants would be adequate to test a null hypothesis of nil benefit additional to routine rehabilitation for chronic stroke patients in a future randomized controlled trial.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document