Intravenous Iron Infusion With Ferric Carboxymaltose in Patients With Heart Failure and Iron Deficiency

Author(s):  
Kardiologiia ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 61 (4) ◽  
pp. 73-78
Author(s):  
Yu. V. Mareev ◽  
S. R. Gilarevsky ◽  
Yu. L. Begrambekova ◽  
Yu. M. Lopatin ◽  
A. A. Garganeeva ◽  
...  

In recent years there has been significant interest in treating iron deficiency (ID) in patients with heart failure (HF) due to its high prevalence and detrimental effects in this population. As stated in the 2020 Russain HF guidelines, Intravenous ferric carboxymaltose remains the only proven therapy for ID.This document was prompted by the results from the recent AFFIRM-AHF trial which demonstrates that treatment of ID after acute HF decompensation reduces the risk of future decompensations. Experts have concluded that in HF patients with acute decompensation, a left ventricular ejection fraction of < 50% and ID, Intravenous ferric carboxymaltose reduces future HF hospitalisations. Patients with stable HF may also benefit from treatment of ID to improve quality of life and alleviate symptoms.  It is, therefore, reasonable to screen for and treat ID in patients with HF.


2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_M) ◽  
pp. M32-M35 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ewa A Jankowska ◽  
Michał Tkaczyszyn ◽  
Marcin Drozd ◽  
Piotr Ponikowski

Abstract The 2016 ESC/HFA heart failure (HF) guidelines emphasize the importance of identifying and treating iron deficiency (ID) in patients with HF. Iron deficiency can occur in half or more of HF sufferers, depending on age and the phase of the disease. Iron deficiency can be a cause of anaemia, but it is also common even without anaemia, meaning that ID is a separate entity, which should be screened for within the HF population. Although assessment of iron stores in bone marrow samples is the most accurate method to investigate iron status, it is not practical in most HF patients. Levels of circulating iron biomarkers are an easily available alternative; especially, ferritin and transferrin saturation (Tsat). In patients with HF serum ferritin level &lt;100 µg/L (regardless of Tsat value) or between 100 and 299 µg/L with Tsat &lt;20% are considered as recommended criteria for the diagnosis of ID, criteria which have been used in the clinical trials in HF that have led to a recommendation to treat ID with intravenous iron. We discuss the optimal measures of iron biomarkers in patients with HF in order to screen and monitor iron status and introduce some novel ways to assess iron status.


2009 ◽  
Vol 361 (25) ◽  
pp. 2436-2448 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefan D. Anker ◽  
Josep Comin Colet ◽  
Gerasimos Filippatos ◽  
Ronnie Willenheimer ◽  
Kenneth Dickstein ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Fraser J. Graham ◽  
Pierpaolo Pellicori ◽  
Ian Ford ◽  
Mark C. Petrie ◽  
Paul R. Kalra ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The recent AFFIRM-AHF trial assessing the effect of intravenous (IV) iron on outcomes in patients hospitalised with worsening heart failure who had iron deficiency (ID) narrowly missed its primary efficacy endpoint of recurrent hospitalisations for heart failure (HHF) or cardiovascular (CV) death. We conducted a meta-analysis to determine whether these results were consistent with previous trials. Methods We searched for randomised trials of patients with heart failure investigating the effect of IV iron vs placebo/control groups that reported HHF and CV mortality from 1st January 2000 to 5th December 2020. Seven trials were identified and included in this analysis. A fixed effect model was applied to assess the effects of IV iron on the composite of first HHF or CV mortality and individual components of these. Results Altogether, 2,166 patients were included (n = 1168 assigned to IV iron; n = 998 assigned to control). IV iron reduced the composite of HHF or CV mortality substantially [OR 0.73; (95% confidence interval 0.59–0.90); p = 0.003]. Outcomes were consistent for the pooled trials prior to AFFIRM-AHF. Whereas first HHF were reduced substantially [OR 0.67; (0.54–0.85); p = 0.0007], the effect on CV mortality was uncertain but appeared smaller [OR 0.89; (0.66–1.21); p = 0.47]. Conclusion Administration of IV iron to patients with heart failure and ID reduces the risk of the composite outcome of first heart failure hospitalisation or cardiovascular mortality, but this outcome may be driven predominantly by an effect on HHF. At least three more substantial trials of intravenous iron are underway. Graphic abstract


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document