Peer Support To Enhance The Shanghai Integration Model Of Diabetes Care: Dissemination To 12 Communities

Author(s):  
Diabetes ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 68 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 876-P
Author(s):  
PATRICK Y. TANG ◽  
YUEXING LIU ◽  
MUCHIEH M. COUFAL ◽  
YIQING QIAN ◽  
CHUN CAI ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Paddy Gillespie ◽  
Eamon O'Shea ◽  
Gillian Paul ◽  
Tom O'Dowd ◽  
Susan M. Smith

Objectives: The aim of this study is to examine the cost-effectiveness of a group-based peer support intervention in general practice for patients with type 2 diabetes.Methods: Incremental cost utility analysis combining within trial and beyond trial components to compare the lifetime costs and benefits of alternative strategies: Control: standardized diabetes care; Intervention: group-based peer support in addition to standardized diabetes care. Within trial analysis was based on a cluster randomized controlled trial of 395 patients with type 2 diabetes in the east of Ireland. Beyond trial analysis was conducted using the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Outcomes Model. Uncertainty was explored using a range of sensitivity analyses and cost-effectiveness acceptability curves were generated.Results: Compared with the control strategy, the intervention was associated with an increase of 0.09 (95 percent confidence interval [CI], −0.05 to 0.25) in mean quality-adjusted life-years per patient and savings of €637.43 (95 percent CI, −2455.19 to 1125.45) in mean healthcare cost per patient and €623.39 (95 percent CI, −2507.98 to 1298.49) in mean total cost per patient respectively. The likelihood of the intervention being cost-effective was appreciably higher than 80 percent for a range of potential willingness-to-pay cost-effectiveness thresholds.Conclusions: Our results suggest that while a group-based peer support intervention shows a trend toward improved risk factor management, we found no significant differences in final cost or effectiveness endpoints between intervention and control. The probabilistic results suggest that the intervention was more cost-effective, with probability values of higher than 80 percent across a range of potential cost-effectiveness threshold values.


2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zahra Aziz ◽  
◽  
Michaela A. Riddell ◽  
Pilvikki Absetz ◽  
Margaret Brand ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 46 (3) ◽  
pp. 230-241 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle L. Litchman ◽  
Tamara K. Oser ◽  
Lisa Hodgson ◽  
Mark Heyman ◽  
Heather R. Walker ◽  
...  

Purpose The purpose of this study is to report a systematic review of reviews of evidence and gaps focused on in-person and technology-mediated diabetes peer support and its impact on clinical, behavioral, and psychosocial outcomes. Methods We conducted a systematic review of reviews in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Reviews published in English from December 1978 through December 2018 examining clinical, behavioral, and psychosocial outcomes were included. The search yielded 167 reviews that were examined for inclusion/exclusion criteria. Results Nine systematic reviews and meta-analyses meeting criteria were included. Findings suggest peer support interventions can have a positive impact on clinical (A1C, blood pressure, cholesterol, weight), behavioral (diabetes knowledge, being active, healthy eating, medication management, self-management, self-efficacy, empowerment), and psychosocial (social support, health and diabetes distress, depression, quality of life) outcomes. Research gaps exist related to understanding the effects of emerging technology-mediated peer support modalities and the effects of peer support on gestational diabetes. Conclusion Many clinical, behavioral, and psychosocial benefits related to in-person and technology-mediated peer support exist. Diabetes care and education specialists should incorporate and recommend peer support resources for people with diabetes.


2020 ◽  
pp. 417-437
Author(s):  
Patrick Y. Tang ◽  
Edwin B. Fisher
Keyword(s):  

Diabetes ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 67 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 718-P
Author(s):  
MUCHIEH M. COUFAL ◽  
PATRICK Y. TANG ◽  
EDWIN B. FISHER ◽  
WEIPING JIA

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document