Addressing Intimate Partner Violence Among Women Veterans

Author(s):  
2018 ◽  
Vol 54 (4) ◽  
pp. 584-590 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ann Elizabeth Montgomery ◽  
Anneliese E. Sorrentino ◽  
Meagan C. Cusack ◽  
Scarlett L. Bellamy ◽  
Elina Medvedeva ◽  
...  

Partner Abuse ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 251-271 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suzannah K. Creech ◽  
Alexandra Macdonald ◽  
Casey Taft

Background: Women veterans may be at high risk for intimate partner violence (IPV), which increases susceptibility for negative physical and mental health. IPV experiences and use have not previously been studied among the newest generation of women veterans who deployed to the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan. Method: This study examined the correlates of IPV in a sample of 102 women veterans who had deployed to the conflicts in Iraq or Afghanistan and who were in current intimate relationships. Using an anonymous web-based survey, participants completed measures of combat and sexual harassment exposure during deployment, measures of mental health and substance abuse, intimate relationship satisfaction, and recent IPV. Results: Results indicated that 63% of the sample reported experiencing any IPV in the past 6 months, whereas 73% reported using IPV toward their partner in the past 6 months. Linear regressions indicated intimate relationship satisfaction explained significant variance in recent psychological IPV, whereas alcohol misuse and recent psychological IPV experiences explained significant variance in physical IPV experiences and use and sexual IPV experiences. Conclusion: Women veterans in this study reported high levels of recent IPV experiences as well as the use of IPV. Results suggest the need to assess for both IPV use and IPV experiences in medical settings, and that for some women veterans, IPV prevention that focuses on healthy relationship functioning may be beneficial.


2013 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 114-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melissa E. Dichter ◽  
Gala True ◽  
Steven C. Marcus ◽  
April A. Gerlock ◽  
Elizabeth M. Yano

2019 ◽  
Vol 184 (5-6) ◽  
pp. e201-e210
Author(s):  
Paige E Iovine-Wong ◽  
Corey Nichols-Hadeed ◽  
Jennifer Thompson Stone ◽  
Stephanie Gamble ◽  
Wendi Cross ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara B. Danitz ◽  
Shannon Wiltsey Stirman ◽  
Alessandra R. Grillo ◽  
Melissa E. Dichter ◽  
Mary Driscoll ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Intimate partner violence (IPV) against women is a global health problem that is a substantial source of human suffering. Within the United States (US), women veterans are at high risk for experiencing IPV. There is an urgent need for feasible, acceptable, and patient-centered IPV counseling interventions for the growing number of women treated in the US’s largest integrated healthcare system, the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). Implementation science and user-centered-design (UCD) can play an important role in accelerating the research-to-practice pipeline. Recovering from IPV through Strengths and Empowerment (RISE) is a flexible, patient-centered, modular-based program that holds promise as a brief counseling intervention for women veterans treated in VHA. We utilized a UCD approach to develop and refine RISE (prior to formal effectiveness evaluations) by soliciting early feedback from the providers where the intervention will ultimately be implemented. The current study reports on the feedback from VHA providers that was used to tailor and refine RISE. Method We conducted and analyzed semi-structured, key-informant interviews with VHA providers working in clinics relevant to the delivery of IPV interventions (n = 23) at two large medical centers in the US. Participants’ mean age was 42.6 years (SD = 11.6), they were predominately female (91.3%) and from a variety of relevant disciplines (39.1% psychologists, 21.7% social workers, 17.4% physicians, 8.7% registered nurses, 4.3% psychiatrists, 4.3% licensed marriage and family therapists, 4.3% peer specialists). We conducted rapid content analysis using a hybrid inductive-deductive approach. Results Providers perceived RISE as highly acceptable and feasible, noting strengths including RISE’s structure, patient-centered agenda, and facilitation of provider comfort in addressing IPV. Researchers identified themes related to content and context modifications, including requests for additional safety check-ins, structure for goal-setting, and suggestions for how to develop and implement RISE-specific trainings. Conclusions These findings have guided refinements to RISE prior to formal effectiveness testing in VHA. We discuss implications for the use of UCD in intervention development and refinement for interventions addressing IPV and other trauma in health care settings globally. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03261700; Date of registration: 8/25/2017, date of enrollment of first participant in trial: 10/22/2018. Unique Protocol ID: IIR 16–062.


2016 ◽  
Vol 31 (8) ◽  
pp. 888-894 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachel Kimerling ◽  
Katherine M. Iverson ◽  
Melissa E. Dichter ◽  
Allison L. Rodriguez ◽  
Ava Wong ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 767-771 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherine M. Iverson ◽  
Rowena Mercado ◽  
Sarah L. Carpenter ◽  
Amy E. Street

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document