scholarly journals CT and MRI Evaluation of Bilateral Enlarged Vestibular Aqueduct Syndrome with Curved Reconstructions – A Case Report and Short Review of Literature

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 01-06
Author(s):  
Chithra Ram ◽  
Erik Seroogy ◽  
Richard Sherry

Enlarged Vestibular Aqueduct Syndrome (EVAS) is a known, but rare entity. It represents a common cause of congenital sensorineural hearing loss, diagnosed more often in children with a slight female predominance. Herein, we report a case of bilateral Enlarged Vestibular Aqueduct Syndrome [EVAS] in a 26-year-old male. As it is a subtle finding on imaging, the interpreting radiologist must be aware of this entity to make the diagnosis. The diagnostic CT and MRI images of this patient are given along with curved CT and MRI reconstructions along the plane of the Vestibular Aqueduct [VA] extending to the endolymphatic sac [ES]. The CT reconstructions demonstrate the bony anatomy in great detail and the bilateral dilated VA. These help in excluding diseases like otospongiosis and inner ear anomalies. The curved MRI reconstruction CISS images through the VA demonstrate the entire endolymph channel. The reconstructed MRI Images clearly demonstrate a patent endolymph channel without any focal abnormality such as stricture, or other associated congenital anomalies.

Author(s):  
Linsheng Wang ◽  
Yuanlin Qin ◽  
Laimin Zhu ◽  
Xiaoyu Li ◽  
Yueqin Chen ◽  
...  

QJM ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 114 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alaa Nasser Hussain Zaher ◽  
Tougan Taha Abd El Aziz ◽  
Ahmed Samy Abdelrahman

Abstract Background Hearing loss management using cochlear implants in patients with inner ear anomalies has long been discussed in the otology community. Magnetic resonances imaging (B,/IRI) and Computed tomography (CT) play important roles in the preoperative assessment of inner ear abnormalities such as cochlear nerve deficiency and variant anatomy as these abnormalities may not only affect the decision of the implantation procedure or the patient's prognosis regarding auditory improvement, but also the risk of complications. Objective To examine the prevalence of inner ear anomalies among cochlear implant recipients in patients with congenital sensorineural hearing loss among the pediatric age group in the Demerdash hospital, Ain Shams university using High resolution computed tomography (HRCT) and MRI imaging. Methods A retrospective descriptive study over the course of 9 months that included all patients that are candidates for cochlear implant referred to the Radiology department, Ain Shams University Hospitals for a preoperative imaging in the form of CT and VIRI scans. Results CT and MRI scans of 33 patients who had congenital hearing loss and were candidates for cochlear implantation with total 66 ears were reviewed. Inner ear anomalies were identified in 8 patients representing a prevalence (24.2%) with 14 ear diseased. Anomalies were seen bilaterally in 6 patients and unilaterally in 2 patients. Among the 14 diseased ear, 9 ears (64.3%) were seen with incomplete partition Il, 7 ears (50%) were seen with enlarged vestibular aqueduct, 4 ears (28.6%) were seen with cochlear hypoplasia, 3 ears (21.4%) were seen with semicircular canal aplasia, 2 ears (14.3%) were seen with incomplete partition type I, 2 ears (14.3%) were seen with cochlear nerve aplasia, 2 ears with cochlear aplasia (14.3%), I ear (7.1%) was seen with common cavity ear (7.1%) with complete labyrinthine aplasia. Conclusion Prevalence of inner ear anomalies among cochlear implant candidates was 24.2%. This result is consistent with results worldwide and the most common anomalies were Incomplete partition Il and large vestibular aqueduct. Abbreviations Computed tomography (CT), Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), High resolution computed tomography (HRCT), Internal auditory canal (IAC), Cerebellopontine angle (CPA).


2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 502-506 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xuelei Zhao ◽  
Xiaohua Cheng ◽  
Lihui Huang ◽  
Xianlei Wang ◽  
Cheng Wen ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 134 ◽  
pp. 110065
Author(s):  
William J. Riggs ◽  
Meghan M. Hiss ◽  
Varun V. Varadarajan ◽  
Jameson K. Mattingly ◽  
Oliver F. Adunka

2019 ◽  
Vol 140 (1) ◽  
pp. 46-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristianna Mey ◽  
Lone Percy-Smith ◽  
Maria Hallstrøm ◽  
Matilde Sandvej ◽  
Per Cayé-Thomasen

2007 ◽  
Vol 133 (2) ◽  
pp. 162 ◽  
Author(s):  
Colm Madden ◽  
Mark Halsted ◽  
Jareen Meinzen-Derr ◽  
Dianna Bardo ◽  
Mark Boston ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 73 (12) ◽  
pp. 1682-1685 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph S. Atkin ◽  
J. Fredrik Grimmer ◽  
Gary Hedlund ◽  
Albert H. Park

2020 ◽  
Vol 132 ◽  
pp. 109909
Author(s):  
Jenna Van Beck ◽  
Sivakumar Chinnadurai ◽  
Alison Kemph Morrison ◽  
M. Geraldine Zuniga ◽  
Bridget Smith ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document