Adult degenerative scoliosis: evaluation and management

2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. E1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fernando E. Silva ◽  
Lawrence G. Lenke

Degenerative scoliosis is a prevalent issue among the aging population. Controversy remains over the role of surgical intervention in patients with this disease. The authors discuss a suitable approach to help guide surgical treatment, including decompression, instrumented posterior spinal fusion, anterior spinal fusion, and osteotomy. These treatment options are based on clinical analysis, radiographic analysis of the mechanical stability of the deformity, given pain generators, and necessary sagittal balance. The high potential complication rates appear to be outweighed by the eventual successful clinical outcomes in patients suitable for operative intervention. This approach has had favorable outcomes and could help resolve the controversy.

AORN Journal ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 108 (3) ◽  
pp. 275-284
Author(s):  
Roumelia S. Jordan

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Truong Van Tri ◽  
Sunna Tarek ◽  
Al-Shakfa Fidaa ◽  
MC Graw Maude ◽  
Boubez Ghassan ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 108-112
Author(s):  
Jonathan Dallas ◽  
Katherine D. Sborov ◽  
Bradley S. Guidry ◽  
Silky Chotai ◽  
Christopher M. Bonfield

OBJECTIVEMany patients undergoing spinal fusion for neuromuscular scoliosis have preexisting neurosurgical implants, including ventricular shunts (VSs) for hydrocephalus and baclofen pumps (BPs) for spastic cerebral palsy. Recent studies have discussed a possible increase in implant complication rates following spinal fusion, but published data are inconclusive. The authors therefore, sought to investigate: 1) the rate of implant complications following fusion, 2) possible causes of these complications, and 3) factors that place patients at higher risk for implant-related complications.METHODSCases involving pediatric patients with a preexisting VS or BP who underwent spinal fusion for scoliosis correction between 2005 and 2016 at a single tertiary children’s hospital were retrospectively analyzed. Patient demographics, implant characteristics, spinal fusion details, neurosurgical follow-up, and implant complications in the 180 days following fusion were recorded and analyzed.RESULTSOverall, 75 patients who underwent scoliosis correction had preexisting implants: 39 had BPs, 31 VSs, and 5 both. The patients’ mean age at fusion was 13.49 ± 2.78 years (range 3.62–18.81 years), and the mean time from the most recent previous implant surgery to fusion was 5.70 ± 4.65 years (range 0.10–17.3 years). The mean preoperative and postoperative Cobb angles were 62.4° ± 18.9° degrees (range 20.9°–109.0°) and 23.5° ± 13.3° degrees (range 2.00°–67.3°), respectively. No VS complications were identified. Two patients with BPs were found to have complications (unintentional cutting of their BP catheter during posterior spinal fusion) within 180 days postfusion. There were no recorded neurosurgical implant infections, failures, fractures, or dislodgements. Although 10 patients required at least 1 surgical procedure for irrigation and debridement of the spine wound following fusion, there were no abdominal or cranial implant wound infections requiring revision, and no implants required removal.CONCLUSIONSThe results of this study suggest that spinal fusion for scoliosis correction does not increase the rates of complications involving previously placed neurosurgical implants. A large-scale, prospective, multicenter study is needed to fully explore and confirm this finding.


Spine ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 33 (20) ◽  
pp. 2237-2242 ◽  
Author(s):  
George H. Thompson ◽  
Ivan Florentino-Pineda ◽  
Connie Poe-Kochert ◽  
Douglas G. Armstrong ◽  
Jochen P. Son-Hing

Spine ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 33 (20) ◽  
pp. 2166-2172 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yipeng Wang ◽  
Qi Fei ◽  
Guixing Qiu ◽  
Chia I. Lee ◽  
Jianxiong Shen ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 100130
Author(s):  
Steven de Reuver ◽  
Philip van der Linden ◽  
Moyo Kruyt ◽  
Tom Schlösser ◽  
René Castelein

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document