Intractable episodic bradycardia resulting from progressive lead traction in an epileptic child with a vagus nerve stimulator: a delayed complication

2012 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 389-393 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aaron J. Clark ◽  
Rachel A. Kuperman ◽  
Kurtis I. Auguste ◽  
Peter P. Sun

Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is used as palliation for adult and pediatric patients with intractable epilepsy who are not candidates for curative resection. Although the treatment is generally safe, complications can occur intraoperatively, perioperatively, and in a delayed time frame. In the literature, there are 2 reports of pediatric patients with implanted VNS units who had refractory bradycardia that resolved after the stimulation was turned off. The authors report the case of a 13-year-old boy with a history of vagus nerve stimulator placement at 2 years of age, who developed intractable episodic bradycardia that persisted despite the cessation of VNS and whose imaging results suggested vagus nerve tethering by the leads. He was subsequently taken to the operating room for exploration, where it was confirmed that the stimulator lead was exerting traction on the vagus nerve, which was displaced from the carotid sheath. After the vagus nerve was untethered and the leads were replaced, the bradycardia eventually resolved with continual effective VNS therapy. When placing a VNS unit in a very young child, accommodations must be made for years of expected growth. Delayed intractable bradycardia can result from a vagus nerve under traction by tethered stimulator leads.

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 563-571
Author(s):  
Angelo Russo ◽  
Ann Hyslop ◽  
Valentina Gentile ◽  
Antonella Boni ◽  
Ian Miller ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 32 (7) ◽  
pp. 624-629 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aimee F. Luat ◽  
Eishi Asano ◽  
Ajay Kumar ◽  
Harry T. Chugani ◽  
Sandeep Sood

Corpus callosotomy is a palliative procedure performed to reduce the severity of drug-resistant epilepsy. The authors assessed its efficacy on different seizure types in 20 subjects (age range 5-19 years); 8 with active vagus nerve stimulator. Fifteen had complete callosotomy, 3 had anterior 2/3, and 2 had anterior 2/3 followed later by complete callosotomy. Ten had endoscopic approach. In all, 65% had ≥ 50% reduction of generalized seizures leading to falls (atonic, tonic, myoclonic); 35% became seizure-free (follow-up period: 6 months to 9 years; mean 3 years). Seizure outcome distribution was better for generalized than for partial seizures ( P = .003). Endoscopic approach was as effective as transcranial approach. Seven subjects who failed vagus nerve stimulator therapy responded with ≥50% seizure reduction. Corpus callosotomy is an effective treatment for intractable generalized epilepsy leading to falls with significant seizure reduction or even elimination of seizures, in the majority of children.


1998 ◽  
Vol 30 (5) ◽  
pp. 286-289 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christie Snively ◽  
Colleen Counsell ◽  
Donna Lilly

2020 ◽  
Vol 99 (7) ◽  

Introduction: Vagus nerve stimulation is a palliative treatment for patients with refractory epilepsy to reduce the frequency and intensity of seizures. A bipolar helical electrode is placed around the left vagus nerve at the cervical level and is connected to the pulse generator placed in a subcutaneous pocket, most commonly in the subclavian region. Methods: Between March 1998 and October 2019, we performed 196 procedures related to the vagal nerve stimulation at the Neurosurgery Department in Motol University Hospital. Of these, 126 patients were vagal nerve stimulator implantation surgeries for intractable epilepsy. The cases included 69 female and 57 male patients with mean age at the time of the implantation surgery 22±12.4 years (range 2.1−58.4 years). Results: Nine patients (7.1%) were afflicted by complications related to implantation. Surgical complications included postoperative infection in 1.6%, VNS-associated arrhythmias in 1.6%, jugular vein bleeding in 0.8% and vocal cord paresis in 2.4%. One patient with vocal cord palsy also suffered from severe dysphagia. One patient (0.8%) did not tolerate extra stimulation with magnet due to a prolonged spasm in his throat. The extra added benefit of vagus stimulation in one patient was a significant reduction of previously regular severe headaches. Conclusion: Vagus nerve stimulation is an appropriate treatment for patients with drug-resistant epilepsy who are not candidates for focal resective surgery. Implantation of the vagus nerve stimulator is a relatively safe operative procedure.


2021 ◽  
Vol 71 ◽  
pp. 110193
Author(s):  
Arthur Chyan ◽  
Sangeeta Kumaraswami ◽  
Suryanarayana Pothula

2016 ◽  
Vol 30 ◽  
pp. 83-87 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandi Lam ◽  
Yimo Lin ◽  
Daniel J. Curry ◽  
Gaddum D. Reddy ◽  
Peter C. Warnke

2009 ◽  
Vol 41 (5) ◽  
pp. 383-387 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naoaki Tanaka ◽  
Elizabeth A. Thiele ◽  
Joseph R. Madsen ◽  
Blaise F. Bourgeois ◽  
Steven M. Stufflebeam

2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 151 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hinaesh Upadhyay ◽  
Sushanth Bhat ◽  
Divya Gupta ◽  
Martha Mulvey ◽  
Sue Ming

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document