scholarly journals Abstracts of the 2021 AANS/CNS Joint Section on Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves Annual Meeting

2021 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-298
Author(s):  
_ _
2008 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 319-325
Author(s):  
Adrian Nowitzke

A fundamental dilemma that faces both neurosurgery in general and the subspecialty field of spine surgery is the question of whether those who trained in the former and now work in the latter should maintain their links with their origins and remain under the broader umbrella of neurosurgery, or whether they should develop their own organizational structure and identity separate from organized neurosurgery. This challenge raises many questions with respect to future potential for growth and development, professional identity, and collegiality. This paper is an edited version of an invited speech to the 2007 Annual Meeting of the Joint Section on Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves. It uses the concept of synergy to review relevant history and explore possible future options for neurosurgery, neurospine, and neuroscience. An example from medical politics is used to illustrate the importance of perspective in approaching these questions, and examples of current therapeutic cutting-edge endeavors highlight the need for team-based behavior that takes a broad view. The premise of the paper is that while individual and specialty aspirations need to be acknowledged, considered, and managed, the results from truly working together will be greater than the sum of the individual efforts—synergy.


2018 ◽  
Vol 44 (3) ◽  
pp. A1-A109
Author(s):  
_ _

Abstracts of the 2018 AANS/CNS Joint Section on Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves Annual Meeting


2009 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 101-103 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul G. Matz ◽  
Paul A. Anderson ◽  
Michael G. Kaiser ◽  
Langston T. Holly ◽  
Michael W. Groff ◽  
...  

In March 2006, the Joint Section on Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves of the American Association of Neurological Surgeons and Congress of Neurological Surgeons compiled an expert group to perform an evidence-based review of the clinical literature on management of cervical degenerative spine disease. This process culminated in the formation of the Guidelines for the Surgical Management of Cervical Degenerative Disease. The purpose of the Guidelines was to address questions regarding the therapy, diagnosis, and prognosis of cervical degenerative disease using an evidence-based approach. Development of an evidence-based review and recommendations is a multitiered process. Typical guideline development consists of 5 processes: 1) collection and selection of the evidence; 2) assessment of the quality and strength of the evidence; 3) analysis of the evidentiary data; 4) formulation of recommendations; and 5) guideline validation. This manuscript details the methodology in compiling the Guidelines for the Surgical Management of Cervical Degenerative Disease.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document