Vertebral artery injury in C-1 lateral mass screw fixation

2006 ◽  
Vol 5 (6) ◽  
pp. 554 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoichi Aota ◽  
Atsushi Honda ◽  
Masaaki Uesugi ◽  
Takayuki Yamashita ◽  
Noriyuki Baba ◽  
...  
2013 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 370-376 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyeong-Wook Yoon ◽  
Jung-Ho Ko ◽  
Chun-Sung Cho ◽  
Sang-Koo Lee ◽  
Young-Joon Kim ◽  
...  

We describe two cases of vertebral artery injury during posterior cervical fusion. We treated both cases by an endovascular technique. The vertebral artery injury may result in catastrophic situations, such as, infarction, massive blood loss and even death. Our clinical outcome was good and we prove that endovascular treatment is an effective and less invasive way to treat vertebral artery injury.


2013 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 759-766 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Syre ◽  
Leonardo Rodriguez-Cruz ◽  
Rajiv Desai ◽  
Karl A. Greene ◽  
Robert Hurst ◽  
...  

Object Gunshot wounds to the atlantoaxial spine are uncommon injuries and rarely require treatment, as a bullet traversing this segment often results in a fatal injury. Additionally, these injuries are typically biomechanically stable. The authors report a series of 10 patients with gunshot wounds involving the lateral mass and/or bodies of the atlantoaxial complex. Their care is discussed and conclusions are drawn from these cases to identify the optimal treatment for these injuries. Methods A retrospective review was conducted of patients presenting to the emergency rooms of 3 institutions with gunshot wounds involving the atlantoaxial spine. Mechanism of injury and neurological status were obtained, as was the extent of the osteoligamentous, vascular, and neurological injuries. Nonoperative and operative treatment, complications, and clinical and radiographic outcome were recorded. The data were then analyzed to determine the neurological and biomechanical prognosis of these injuries, the utility of the various diagnostic modalities in the acute management of the injuries, and the nature and effectiveness of the nonoperative and operative treatment modalities. Results Ten patients with gunshot wounds involving the lateral mass and/or bodies of the atlantoaxial complex were identified. All but 2 patients sustained a vertebral artery injury. Each patient was evaluated using cervical radiographs, CT scans, and vascular imaging, 8 in the form of digital subtraction angiography and 2 with high-resolution CT angiography. Uncomplicated patients were treated conservatively using cervical collar immobilization, local wound care, and antibiotics. One patient was treated using a halo for instability and 1 underwent posterior fusion following a posterolateral decompression for delayed myelopathy. One patient underwent transoral resection of a bullet fragment. One patient underwent embolization for a symptomatic arteriovenous fistula and a second patient underwent a neck exploration and a jugular vein ligation. None of the patients received anticoagulation therapy. The mean follow-up duration was 13 months. All but 2 patients regained their previous functional status and all ultimately attained a mechanically stable spine. Conclusions These 10 patients represent a rare form of cervical spine penetrating injury. Unilateral gunshot wounds to the atlantoaxial complex are usually stable and the need for acute surgical intervention is rare. Unilateral vertebral artery injury is well tolerated and any information provided by angiography does not alter the acute management of the patient. Vascular complications from gunshot wounds can be managed effectively by endovascular techniques.


2021 ◽  
Vol 104 (3) ◽  
pp. 475-481

Objective: Atlantoaxial instability can be caused by various etiologies and surgical fixation is often required. Various methods have been described for atlantoaxial fixation. Screw fixation is associated with an increased risk of vertebral artery injury especially in patients with an anomalous vertebral artery location or abnormal bony anomalies. A new C1 posterior arch crossing screw fixation technique was proposed to reduce the risk of vertebral artery injury. The present study aimed to assess morphometric CT analysis of atlas for C1 posterior arch crossing screw fixation in Thai people. Materials and Methods: The present research was an observational study that reviewed 150 computed tomography (CT) scans of the patients who had neck trauma or any other complaint requiring craniocervical investigations. Atlantoaxial articulation deformities due to trauma, infections, neoplasm, congenital anomaly, inflammatory disease, incomplete CT scan analysis, and history of surgical intervention of the cervical spine were excluded. All the images were measured for the height of the posterior tubercle, the width of the posterior arch was measured bilaterally in three parts on the axial plane, part 1: medial of the VA groove, where the arch transforms into the VA groove, part 2: the middle part between the posterior tubercle and medial of the VA, and part 3: posterior tubercle, length of the screw, and the screw projection angle was calculated. Results: Out of the 139 CT scans analyzed, the mean measurement of posterior arch height was 7.45±1.03 mm, wherein 73.3% exceed 7 mm. The mean width of the left posterior arch in part 1, 2, and 3 was 4.50±0.70 mm, 4.90±0.70 mm, and 5.70±0.80 mm, respectively, and the width of the right posterior arch in part 1, 2, and 3 was 4.50±0.70 mm, 4.80±0.70 mm, and 5.60±0.80 mm, respectively. The mean crossing screw length of the Left and Right was 17.02±3.04 mm and 17.37±2.75 mm, respectively. The mean angle of screw of the Left and Right was 24.62±3.38 degrees and 24.78±3.57 degrees, respectively. There were no significant differences in these variables between gender or sides (p>0.05) except the mean angle of the screw between gender (p<0.05). Conclusion: C1 posterior arch screw fixation is feasible in the adult Thai population. Preoperative thin-cut CT is essential for planning successful posterior arch crossing screws placement. Keywords: C1 posterior arch, Computed tomography, Crossing screw fixation


Spine ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 21 (11) ◽  
pp. 1291-1295 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nabil A. Ebraheim ◽  
Rongming Xu ◽  
Richard A. Yeasting

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Z Mao ◽  
Justice O Agyei ◽  
Moleca M Ghannam ◽  
Asham Khan ◽  
Marc Christensen ◽  
...  

Abstract Traditionally, lateral mass screws (LMSs) have been the mainstay of posterior fixation in the subaxial spine. Although LMSs provide adequate fixation, cervical pedicle screws (CPSs) facilitate high fusion rates (90.5%) and provide for greater bone purchase, better reduction, lower rates of screw loosening or pull out, 2 times greater biomechanical advantage, superior stabilization, decreased development of pseudarthrosis, and decreased revision surgeries compared to LMSs.1-4 In addition, CPSs can be a powerful bail-out option after lateral mass construct failure. Navigation-guided CPS placement has been reported to have an accuracy of 90.3%.5 Navigation has the added advantage of mitigating screw malposition for the placement of CPS because of the smaller pedicle sizes and variability in cervical anatomy.1,3,6 The potential risks of subaxial CPS placement include the risks of vertebral artery injury, spinal cord injury, and injury to adjacent neurovasculature.2 The overall radiographic breach rate with intraoperative imaging is reported to range from 2.9% of 22.9%, with the majority of breaches occurring in the lateral direction.7,8 Despite radiographic breaches, the occurrence of nerve root injury (0.31% per screw), vertebral artery injury (0.15% per screw), and spinal cord injury (0% per screw) is rare.3,7 Here, we demonstrate navigation-assisted C1-C2 posterior fusion, with combined C1 LMSs and C2 pedicle screws with subaxial pedicle screw revision of prior failed instrumentation.3  The patient gave informed consent for surgery and video recording. Institutional review board approval was deemed unnecessary.


2013 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. e93
Author(s):  
Danielle Y. Ponzio ◽  
Alexander R. Vaccaro ◽  
James S. Harrop ◽  
Robert J. Ponzio ◽  
Christopher K. Kepler ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 43 (5) ◽  
pp. 572 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seong Wan Kim ◽  
Jin S. Yeom ◽  
Yoon Ju Kwon ◽  
Seung Min You ◽  
Young Hee An ◽  
...  

JBJS Reviews ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. e20.00118-e20.00118
Author(s):  
Pradip Ramamurti ◽  
Jeffrey Weinreb ◽  
Safa C. Fassihi ◽  
Raj Rao ◽  
Shalin Patel

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document