Artificial disc replacement and adjacent-segment pathology: 10-year outcomes of a randomized trial

OBJECTIVE Artificial disc replacement (ADR) is designed to preserve motion and thus protect against adjacent-segment pathology (ASP) and act as an alternative treatment to fusion surgery. The question remains, how well do ADR devices perform after 10 years of follow-up compared with fusion surgery in terms of patient satisfaction, sustainability, and protection against ASP? METHODS This was the 10-year follow-up study of 153 participants who underwent ADR or fusion surgery after anterior decompression due to cervical degenerative radiculopathy (ISRCTN registration no. 44347115). Scores on the Neck Disability Index (NDI), EQ-5D, and visual analog scale for neck and arm pain were obtained from the Swedish Spine Registry and analyzed using ANCOVA. Information about secondary surgical procedures was collected from medical records and presented as Kaplan-Meier curves. MRI and flexion-extension radiography were performed, and ASP was graded according to the Miyazaki classification system. RESULTS Ten participants were lost to follow-up, which left 143 participants (80 underwent ADR and 65 underwent anterior cervical discectomy and fusion). There were no differences between groups in terms of patient-reported outcome measures (10-year difference in NDI scores 1.7 points, 95% CI −5.1 to 8.5, p = 0.61). Nineteen (24%) participants in the ADR group compared with 9 (14%) in the fusion group underwent secondary surgical procedures. The higher reoperation rate of the ADR group was mainly due to 11 female participants with device loosening. The rates of reoperation due to ASP were similar between groups, which was confirmed with MRI assessment of ASP that also showed no differences between the groups (p = 0.21). CONCLUSIONS This was the first 10-year follow-up study to compare ADR with fusion surgery and to provide MRI information for the assessment of ASP. The authors found no benefit of ADR over fusion surgery after anterior decompression for cervical degenerative radiculopathy.

Pathophysiology and surgical treatment of spinal adhesive arachnoid pathology: patient series

BACKGROUND Spinal adhesive arachnoid pathology is a rare cause of myelopathy. Because of rarity and variability, mechanisms of myelopathy are unknown. The authors retrospectively analyzed patients to understand pathophysiology and provide implications for surgical treatment. OBSERVATIONS Nineteen consecutive patients were studied. Thirteen patients had a secondary pathology due to etiological disorders such as spinal surgery or hemorrhagic events. They received arachnoid lysis (4 patients), syringo-subarachnoid (S-S) shunt (8 patients) with or without lysis, or anterior decompression. Three of them developed motor deterioration after lysis, and 6 patients needed further 8 surgeries. Another 6 patients had idiopathic pathology showing dorsal arachnoid cyst formation at the thoracic level that was surgically resected. With mean follow-up of 44.3 months, only 4 patients with the secondary pathology showed improved neurological grade, whereas all patients with idiopathic pathology showed improvement. LESSONS The idiopathic pathology was the localized dorsal arachnoid adhesion that responded to surgical treatment. The secondary pathology produced disturbed venous circulation of the spinal cord by extensive adhesions. Lysis of the thickened fibrous membrane with preservation of thin arachnoid over the spinal veins may provide safe decompression. S-S shunt was effective if the syrinx extended to the level of normal subarachnoid space.

Anterior decompression through a posterior approach for thoracic myelopathy caused by ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: a novel concept in anterior decompression and technical notes with the preliminary outcomes

OBJECTIVE Various surgical procedures are used to manage thoracic myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). However, the outcomes of surgery for thoracic OPLL are generally unfavorable in comparison to surgery for cervical OPLL. Previous studies have shown a significant risk of perioperative complications in surgery for thoracic OPLL. Thus, a safe and secure surgical method to ensure better neurological recovery with less perioperative complications is needed. The authors report a novel concept of anterior decompression through a posterior approach aimed at anterior shift of the OPLL during surgery rather than extirpation or size reduction of the OPLL. This surgical technique can securely achieve anterior shift of the OPLL using a curved drill, threadwire saw, and curved rongeur. The preliminary outcomes were investigated to evaluate the safety and efficacy of this technique. METHODS This study included 10 consecutive patients who underwent surgery for thoracic OPLL. Surgical outcomes, including the ambulatory status, Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, and perioperative complications, were investigated retrospectively. In this surgery, pedicle screws are introduced at least three levels above and below the corresponding levels. The laminae, facet joints, transverse processes, and pedicles are then removed bilaterally at levels wherein subsequent anterior decompression is performed. For anterior decompression, the OPLL and posterior portion of the vertebral bodies are partially resected using a high-speed drill with a curved burr, enabling the removal of osseous tissues just ventral to the spinal cord without retracting the dural sac. To securely shift the OPLL anteriorly, the intact PLL and posterior portion of the vertebral bodies cranial and caudal to the lesion are completely resected using a threadwire saw and/or curved rongeur. Rods are connected to the screws, and bone grafting is performed for posterolateral fusion. RESULTS Five patients were nonambulatory before surgery, but all were able to walk at the final follow-up. The average JOA score before surgery and at the final follow-up was 3.2 and 8.8 points, respectively. Notably, the mean recovery rate of JOA score was 72%. Furthermore, no patients showed neurological deterioration postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS The surgical technique is a useful alternative for safely achieving sufficient anterior decompression through a posterior approach and may consequently reduce the risk of postoperative neurological deterioration and improve surgical outcomes in patients with thoracic OPLL.

An extremely rare presentation of AV fistula: Massive destruction of multiple vertebral bodies with paraparesis

Background: Spinal ventral epidural arteriovenous fistulas (EDAVFs) are rare and underdiagnosed entities and usually present with benign symptoms such as radiculopathy. To the best of our knowledge, EDAVFs presenting with massive vertebral body destruction have not been reported in the literature. Case Description: A young male presented with mid back pain for 1 year and weakness of both lower limbs for 3 months. He was clinicoradiologically diagnosed with spinal tuberculosis and started on antitubercular treatment elsewhere. Radiological investigations suggested destruction and collapse of T12 and L1 vertebrae. Prominent flow voids were seen in T9-L2 epidural space, likely prominent epidural vessels. The primary differential diagnoses were spinal tuberculosis and neoplastic etiologies. T9 to L3 surgical stabilization and anterior decompression by pediculectomy of left T12 and L was done. The surgeon encountered massive bleeding at the time of anterior decompression and a vascular etiology was suspected. Biopsy revealed negative results for infection or malignancy. DSA revealed ventral EDAVFs, and hence, transcatheter embolization was performed. He had excellent outcome on assessment at 21 months postoperative follow-up. Conclusion: Spinal epidural AVFs can rarely present with gross vertebral body destruction and paraparesis. Preoperative radiological assessment with suspicion of spinal epidural AVFs can help to avoid intraoperative difficulties and complications. Timely, management of spinal epidural AVFs can result in excellent outcomes