scholarly journals DEPENDENCE OF ALEXITHYMIA INTENSITY ON COMPONENTS OF PSYCHOSOCIAL ADAPTATION IN MEN WITH PSYCHOTROPIC SUBSTANCE USE DISORDERS

Author(s):  
D.I. Boiko

Introduction. Levels of alexithymia and psychosocial adaptation can influence on the treatment and rehabilitation of patients with substance use disorders. The investigation of the state of the adaptation system is often used to examine these patients, despite its complexity and multilevel character. It is still unclear what characteristics of psychosocial adaptation may indicate increasing level of alexithymia. Therefore the aim of this study is to investigate their association for future prediction of alexithymia level in men with substance use disorders. Methods. We examined 28 men who took the treatment at the detoxication therapy stage. We studied severity of alexithymia by Russian version of the Toronto Alexithymia Scale and analyzed peculiarities of psycho-social adaptation by C.R. Rogers and R.F. Dymond methods. To analyze the dependence between variances, multiple linear regression with Akaike information criteria and stepwise variable method was used. Results. The average level of alexithymia in the subjects was 57.6 ± 14.1 scores: it points out an elevated severity of the condition. The patients have “difficulty identifying feelings” at 18.9±6.6 scores, “difficulty describing feelings” at 13.7±4.9 scores and “externally oriented thinking” at 25.04±5.4 scores. The average levels of the subscales of the psychosocial adaptation questionnaire demonstrate no difference from normal values, but integral indices were increased. After stepwise variable method we selected the minimum set of factor characteristics associated with the original variable. Two factors related to the level of alexithymia were identified: internality and emotional comfort. The analysis shows the adequacy of the linear two-factor model for predicting the level of alexithymia in men with substance use disorders that based on values of internality and emotional comfort. Conclusion. We found that increased level of internality and emotional comfort in men with substance use disorders can predict an elevating level of alexithymia.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph Diehl ◽  
Craig Anthony Rodriguez-Seijas

Objectives: The Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ) assesses five components of mindfulness. Studies of the FFMQ among clinical samples, however, fail to replicate the proposed factor structure. Failure to adequately understand the dimensionality of common mindfulness measures within clinical samples, therefore, represents an important gap in the current literature. The increasing popularity of mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) warrants further investigation of differential associations between facets of mindfulness and different forms of psychopathology. Methods: We examined (1) the underlying structure of the FFMQ and FFMQ-SF and (2) associations between mindfulness facets and transdiagnostic factors of psychopathology (i.e. internalizing and substance use disorders) in two large clinical samples (N = 2,779). Results: Though bass-ackwards analyses determined that 6-factor models provided the best fit to the data, the 5-factor model was optimal in terms of fit and parsimony. Exploratory structural equation modeling revealed that all FFMQ facets were associated with the internalizing factor. Associations with substance use disorders were more complex. Conclusions: Mindfulness covariance within the FFMQ and the FFMQ-SF is best explained by a 5-factor model, with facets of mindfulness defined correspondingly to the original scale. While deficits in all FFMQ facets with the exception of observe are typical of internalizing psychopathology, a more nuanced association may be observed with substance use disorders. These results also bear implications for psychopathology intervention; while general mindfulness-based interventions might be appropriate for internalizing disorders, more specialized focus for externalizing psychopathology might be beneficial.


2015 ◽  
Vol 29 ◽  
pp. 93-100 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Trautmann ◽  
S. Schönfeld ◽  
S. Behrendt ◽  
J. Schäfer ◽  
M. Höfler ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph M. Diehl ◽  
Craig Anthony Rodriguez-Seijas ◽  
Justine S. Thompson ◽  
Kristy Dalrymple ◽  
Iwona Chelminski ◽  
...  

Recent studies of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ) and its condensed version (FFMQ-SF) fail to replicate the initially proposed 5-factor structure in clinical samples. Failure to adequately understand the dimensionality of common mindfulness measures within clinical samples, therefore, represents an important gap in the current literature. The increasing popularity of mindfulness-based interventions warrants further investigation of differential associations between facets of mindfulness and different forms of psychopathology. We examined (1) the underlying structure of the FFMQ and FFMQ-SF and (2) associations between FFMQ and FFMQ-SF facets and dimensions of psychopathology (i.e. internalizing and substance use disorders) in two large clinical samples (N = 2,779). Results from bass-ackwards analyses suggested similarly defensible 5- and 6-factor models solutions in terms of fit. The 5-factor model was optimal when factoring in parsimony. Exploratory structural equation modeling revealed that all FFMQ facets with the exception of observe were negatively associated with the internalizing factor. Associations with substance use disorders were more complex. In both samples, 5-factor FFMQ and FFMQ-SF models were determined to best represent these data. While deficits in all FFMQ facets with the exception of observe correspond with lower internalizing psychopathology, a more nuanced association was observed with substance use disorders.


2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Michelle Tuten ◽  
Hendree E. Jones ◽  
Cindy M. Schaeffer ◽  
Maxine L. Stitzer

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. C. van Boekel ◽  
E. P. M. Brouwers ◽  
J. van Weeghel ◽  
H. F. L. Garretsen

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document