scholarly journals Impact of Amyloid PET Imaging in the Memory Clinic: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 64 (1) ◽  
pp. 323-335 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yat-Fung Shea ◽  
Warren Barker ◽  
Maria T. Greig-Gusto ◽  
David A. Loewenstein ◽  
Ranjan Duara ◽  
...  
2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Perani Daniela ◽  
Schillaci Orazio ◽  
Padovani Alessandro ◽  
Nobili Flavio Mariano ◽  
Iaccarino Leonardo ◽  
...  

PET based tools can improve the early diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and differential diagnosis of dementia. The importance of identifying individuals at risk of developing dementia among people with subjective cognitive complaints or mild cognitive impairment has clinical, social, and therapeutic implications. Within the two major classes of AD biomarkers currently identified, that is, markers of pathology and neurodegeneration, amyloid- and FDG-PET imaging represent decisive tools for their measurement. As a consequence, the PET tools have been recognized to be of crucial value in the recent guidelines for the early diagnosis of AD and other dementia conditions. The references based recommendations, however, include large PET imaging literature based on visual methods that greatly reduces sensitivity and specificity and lacks a clear cut-off between normal and pathological findings. PET imaging can be assessed using parametric or voxel-wise analyses by comparing the subject’s scan with a normative data set, significantly increasing the diagnostic accuracy. This paper is a survey of the relevant literature on FDG and amyloid-PET imaging aimed at providing the value of quantification for the early and differential diagnosis of AD. This allowed a meta-analysis and GRADE analysis revealing high values for PET imaging that might be useful in considering recommendations.


2021 ◽  
Vol 92 (8) ◽  
pp. A13.2-A14
Author(s):  
Flavia Loreto ◽  
Stephen Gunning ◽  
Mara Golemme ◽  
Hilary Watt ◽  
Neva Patel ◽  
...  

ObjectivesThe typical onset of Alzheimers Disease (AD) is characterised by episodic memory impairment. However, AD pathology can present with atypical clinical features and/or mixed aetiologies, which often lead to diagnostic uncertainty. Biomarker evaluation using amyloid PET imaging (API) in this group is guided by published appropriate use criteria (Johnson et al., 2013). A large proportion of these patients is also referred for clinical neuropsychological assessment. Here, we investigate the cognitive profiles and affective symptoms of memory clinic patients who are referred to both API and neuropsychological assessment as part of their diagnostic assessment.MethodsFrom a larger group of 396 patients that underwent clinical API between December 2013 and June 2019 at the Imperial Memory Clinic, we included individuals who also had a formal neuropsychological assessment (minimum of 4 domains) within 18 months of API and who received subsequent follow-up at our clinic. Referrals to API were in line with the appropriate use criteria and took place after multidisciplinary team discussion. A total of 107 patients, 47 amyloid-positive (Aβ-pos) and 60 amyloid-negative (Aβ-neg), were included. The Aβ-neg group was further divided into progressive (progAβ-neg, n=26) and stable (stableAβ-neg, n=34), based on the presence or absence of documented clinical progression and/or concomitant neurological condition.ResultsThe three groups were comparable for age and premorbid IQ, while there was a lower proportion of females in the stableAβ-neg group (table 1). ANCOVA models (with age, sex and premorbid IQ as covariates, and group as fixed factor) revealed that the Aβ-pos group performed worse than both negative groups in the domains of visuospatial and working memory (figure 1). The Aβ-pos group differed from the stableAβ-neg but not the progAβ-neg group on a measure of episodic memory (figure 1). The Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale (HADS) was administered to 85 patients (36 Aβ-pos, 20 progAβ-neg, 29 stableAβ-neg): non-parametric testing revealed higher levels of depressive symptoms in the stableAβ-neg group than in the Aβ-pos group (figure 2a). Notably, a significant proportion of patients reported clinical levels (HADS≥8) of anxiety and depression across all groups (figure 2b).Abstract #2977 Table 1Demographic and general characteristics of the study sampleAβ-posstableAβ-negprogAβ-negAgeyears,meanSD66.578.84 68.0310.48 66.588.71 PremorbidIQ,meanSD101.2712.3 101.9313.45 100.9611.95 Gender,%female61.70% 29.4% 50% Abstract #2977 Figure 1(A) Unadjusted mean raw anxiety and depression scores as measured by the HADS. *adjusted p<0.05; (B) Proportion of patients with clinically significant levels (HADS≥8) of anxiety and depression.Abstract #2977 Figure 2ConclusionsIn a memory clinic cohort undergoing clinical amyloid PET imaging and neuropsychological assessment, visuospatial dysfunction and working memory impairment were better indicators of Alzheimers pathology than episodic memory dysfunction. Moreover, in this group we found a high prevalence of anxiety and depressive symptoms regardless of amyloid status.Loreto et al. Cognitive performance and affective symptoms in patients undergoing clinical Amyloid PET Imaging


2006 ◽  
Vol 14 (7S_Part_15) ◽  
pp. P807-P807
Author(s):  
Michael H. Rosenbloom ◽  
Kathryn A. Wyman-Chick ◽  
Lauren O. Erickson ◽  
Paul Carolan ◽  
Joshua Johnson ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rafid Mustafa ◽  
Jared R. Brosch ◽  
Gil D. Rabinovici ◽  
Bradford C. Dickerson ◽  
Maria C. Carrillo ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document