Diagnosing X-linked Myotubular Myopathy – A German 20-year Follow Up Experience

X-linked myotubular myopathy (XLMTM) is a life-threatening rare neuromuscular disease, which is caused by pathogenic variants in the MTM1 gene. It has a large phenotypic heterogeneity, ranging from patients, who are able to walk independently to immobile patients who are only able to bring hand to mouth and depend on a respirator 24 hours a day every day. This suggests that ventilator requirements may not illustrate the full clinical picture of patients with XLMTM. At present, there is no curative therapy available, despite first promising results from ongoing gene therapy studies. In this study, we evaluated in detail the data from 13 German XLMTM patients, which was collected over a period of up to 20 years in our university hospital. We compared it to the international prospective longitudinal natural history study (NHS) data from 45 patients (containing 11 German patients). To highlight the broad phenotypic spectrum of the disease, we additionally focused on the clinical presentation of three cases at a glance. Comparing our data with the above mentioned natural history study, it appears the patients of the present German cohort seem to be more often severely affected, with higher frequency of non-ambulatory patients and patients on ventilation (and for longer time) and a higher proportion of patients needing a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Another key finding is a potential gap in time between first clinical presentation and final diagnosis, showing a need for patients to be treated in a specialized center for neuromuscular diseases.

Download Full-text

A research proposal testing a new model of ambulation activity among long-term care residents with dementia/cognitive impairment: the study protocol of a prospective longitudinal natural history study

BMC Research Notes ◽

10.1186/s13104-019-4585-5 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 12 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Mary Elizabeth Bowen ◽

Meredeth A. Rowe ◽

Ming Ji ◽

Pamela Cacchione

Keyword(s):

Cognitive Impairment ◽

Natural History ◽

Study Protocol ◽

Long Term Care ◽

Research Proposal ◽

Term Care ◽

Natural History Study ◽

New Model ◽

Prospective Longitudinal

Download Full-text

OR29-05 A Natural History Study of Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva (FOP): 12-Month Outcomes

Journal of the Endocrine Society ◽

10.1210/jendso/bvaa046.254 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽

Author(s):

Mona Al Mukaddam ◽

Robert J Pignolo ◽

Geneviève Baujat ◽

Matthew A Brown ◽

Carmen De Cunto ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Natural History ◽

Physical Function ◽

Genetic Disorder ◽

Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva ◽

Whole Body ◽

Joint Involvement ◽

Mobility Limitations ◽

Natural History Study ◽

Total Score Range ◽

Prospective Longitudinal

Abstract Background: FOP is an ultra-rare, severely disabling genetic disorder characterized by episodic flare-ups and heterotopic ossification (HO) leading to restricted movement, physical disability, and early death. FOP may initially be misdiagnosed in ~90% of individuals leading to unnecessary and often harmful interventions. Patients with FOP are diagnosed and managed by multiple specialties, including endocrinologists. Data from an ongoing, prospective, longitudinal, global, natural history study (NCT02322255) were used to investigate the progression of FOP, HO formation, and impact on physical functioning over time. We present results from the first 12 months of the 3-year study. Methods: Males and females with FOP and a documented ACVR1 R206H mutation participated. HO volume was assessed by low-dose whole body computed tomography (WBCT) scan, excluding the head. All imaging was interpreted at a blinded, central laboratory using pre-specified procedures. Functional outcomes were evaluated using the Cumulative Analogue Joint Involvement Scale (CAJIS; for each joint: score=0 represents <10% involvement, score=1 represents 10–90% involvement, and score=2 represents >90% ankylosed across 15 major joints; total score range 0 to 30 [higher scores indicate more severe mobility limitations]) and the FOP Physical Function Questionnaire (FOP-PFQ; percent total score). Changes from Baseline at Month 12 were evaluated for new HO volume, CAJIS, and FOP-PFQ. Results: Of 114 participants (pts) with Baseline data, 99 (4 to 56 years at enrollment; mean 17 years of age; 56% male) also had a Month 12 assessment. A total of 93 pts had evaluable WBCT scans at Baseline and Month 12 and were included in the HO analysis. In total, 40% (37/93) of pts had new HO over 12 months; the mean volume of new HO in these pts was 57,706 mm3 (SD=100,079 mm3; median=20,753 mm3; range: 522 to 438,826 mm3). Of the pts with new HO, 65% (24/37) reported at least one flare-up (mean rate of 2.3 flare-ups/year). Over 12 months, 60% (56/93) of pts did not have new HO; 43% (24/56) of them reported at least one flare-up (mean rate of 1.8 flare-ups/year). Mean changes from Baseline in CAJIS and FOP-PFQ were minimal: CAJIS: 0.6 (SD=2.4; median=1.0; n=99) and FOP-PFQ: 4.4% (SD=11.2; median=3.7%; n=90); and were similar across pts with or without new HO. Conclusions: In participants with FOP, although deterioration of physical function is expected over a patient’s lifetime, CAJIS and FOP-PFQ scores did not worsen significantly in the relative short-term of this study. However, HO volume, quantified by WBCT, increased over the course of 12 months. These results show that measuring HO may be a viable way to monitor changes in FOP over short periods of time.

Download Full-text