scholarly journals THE STUDY OF EFFICACY OF SUBLINGUAL MISOPROSTOL IN TERMINATION OF EARLY PREGNANCY

Author(s):  
Arti Kumari ◽  
Usha Kumari ◽  
Anupama Sinha

Introduction: Nearly 20% of all confirmed pregnancies end in spontaneous abortion. Misoprostol’s use in early pregnancy failure is varied and dose and route are not well established. AIM: To study the efficacy of sublingual misoprostol in causing expulsion of products of conception in early pregnancy failure. Methods: Women with an ultrasound diagnosis of early pregnancy failure, less than 12 weeks gestation were included in the study. Tablet Misoprostol 600 mcg was given six hourly sublingually for 3 doses. All observations were noted and analyzed. Results: Mean gestational age was 7.946+1.2 weeks. Mean induction abortion interval was 18.241+1.2 hours. Women with gestational age six to eight weeks had least mean induction-abortion interval time of 17.38+2.86. Mean dose required was 1560mcg. Efficacy of protocol was 92.85% in achieving complete abortion. Conclusion: The regime had 92.85% efficacy, acceptability (90%) and few side effects. Thus by using a lower dose and appropriate interval between two doses (six hours), the side effects were lessened with high efficacy. Keywords: Efficacy, Missed Abortion, Misoprostol.

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Joyce van den Berg ◽  
Charlotte C. Hamel ◽  
Marcus P. Snijders ◽  
Sjors F. Coppus ◽  
Frank P. Vandenbussche

Abstract Background Early pregnancy failure (EPF) is a common complication of pregnancy. If women do not abort spontaneously, they will undergo medical or surgical treatment in order to remove the products of conception from the uterus. Curettage, although highly effective, is associated with a risk of complications; medical treatment with misoprostol is a safe and less expensive alternative. Unfortunately, after 1 week of expectant management in case of EPF, medical treatment with misoprostol has a complete evacuation rate of approximately 50%. Misoprostol treatment results may be improved by pre-treatment with mifepristone; its effectiveness has already been proven for other indications of pregnancy termination. This study will test the hypothesis that, in EPF, the sequential combination of mifepristone with misoprostol is superior to the use of misoprostol alone in terms of complete evacuation (primary outcome), patient satisfaction, complications, side effects and costs (secondary outcomes). Methods The trial will be performed multi-centred, prospectively, two-armed, randomised, double-blinded and placebo-controlled. Women with confirmed EPF by ultrasonography (6–14 weeks), managed expectantly for at least 1 week, can be included and randomised to pre-treatment with oral mifepristone (600 mg) or oral placebo (identical in appearance). Randomisation will take place after receiving written consent to participate. In both arms pre-treatment will be followed by oral misoprostol, which will start 36–48 h later consisting of two doses 400 μg (4 hrs apart), repeated after 24 h if no tissue is lost. Four hundred sixty-four women will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio, stratified by centre. Ultrasonography 2 weeks after treatment will determine short term treatment effect. When the gestational sac is expulsed, expectant management is advised until 6 weeks after treatment when the definitive primary endpoint, complete or incomplete evacuation, will be determined. A sonographic endometrial thickness < 15 mm using only the allocated therapy by randomisation is considered as successful treatment. Secondary outcome measures (patient satisfaction, complications, side effects and costs) will be registered using a case report form, patient diary and validated questionnaires (Short Form 36, EuroQol-VAS, Client Satisfaction Questionnaire, iMTA Productivity Cost Questionnaire). Discussion This trial will answer the question if, in case of EPF, after at least 1 week of expectant management, sequential treatment with mifepristone and misoprostol is more effective than misoprostol alone to achieve complete evacuation of the products of conception. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov (d.d. 02-07-2017): NCT03212352. Trialregister.nl (d.d. 03-07-2017): NTR6550. EudraCT number (d.d. 07-08-2017): 2017–002694-19. File number Commisie Mensgebonden Onderzoek (d.d. 07-08-2017): NL 62449.091.17.


2021 ◽  
pp. 80-82
Author(s):  
Hari Charan Ray ◽  
Himadri Nayek ◽  
Amit Kumar Mandal ◽  
Sankar Nath Mitra

INTRODUCTION: Early pregnancy failure (EPF) is an inclusive term that comprises incomplete, complete, or inevitable spontaneous abortion; anembryonic gestation (blighted ovum); and embryonic demise (missed abortion) at less than 14 weeks 1. It is one of the most common complications of pregnancy, accounting for approximately 15% to 20% of clinically recognized pregnancies 1,2. Many EPFs occur before pregnancies have been clinically recognized (that is, women mistake them for “late cycles”). AIMS & OBJECTIVES: To compare the efcacy between mifepristone 200mg orally followed by misoprostol 800µg vaginally 6 hrs later with mifepristone 200mg orally followed by misoprostol 800µg vaginally 24 hrs later in early pregnancy failure for termination up to 9 weeks of gestation. To reduce unusual blood loss. To reduce surgical intervention in case of early pregnancy failure. MATERIALS & METHODS: Hospital based Prospective randomiSe comparative single centre study. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Midnapore Medical College and Hospital. One year from January 2019 to February 2020 for data collection and six month for data analysis. Mother attended the Gynae OPD clinic and Obstetrics emergency with features of early pregnancy failure. The sample size was 50, with 25 patients in each group. RESULTS:We found that the table 4 shows the distribution according to gestational age. The main indication for which medical abortion was done in our study is early pregnancy failure (Blighted ovum) and missed abortion. Majority of patients were in the gestational age between 8-9 weeks with 48 % of women who underwent 6 hour interval regimen and 40% of women who underwent 24 hour interval regimen. P value documented is 0.849 which is not signicant. There was no signicant difference between two groups regarding gestational age (p value=0.849). SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION: Vaginal Misoprostol can be safely administered 6 hours following Mifepristone instead of waiting for 24 hours. Efcacy in achieving complete abortion rate is almost equal to 24 hours regimen and most acceptable from patient's side also. Additionally, women are less likely to experience side effects the earlier the misoprostol is used. Women can now have more exibility when using mifepristone and vaginal misoprostol for medical abortion


2017 ◽  
Vol 49 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 18-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rabiul Islam ◽  
Sankar Prosad Biswas ◽  
Dolly Halder ◽  
Kaniz Fatima

Background: Early pregnancy failure is a major health problem across the globe. This is particularly important for the woman of Bangladesh.Objective: The aim of our study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of manual vacuum aspiration (MVA) compared to dilatation and curettage (D&C) in the management of first trimester abortion.Methods: This was a prospective randomised study done in Obstetrics & Gynaecology department of Jessore medical college & Khulna medical college. Over a period of one year from January 2014 to December 2014, a total of four hundred women presented with spontaneous miscarriage with gestational age < 12 weeks patients with no sign of septic abortion and no history of pregancy with fibroid uterus were included in the study.Results: These patients underwent random selection either MVA group (n = 200) or D&C group (n=200). Cases were compared with respect to age, parity, gestational age, risk, blood loss, time taken & complications. The distribution of age, parity & gestational age was similar in both groups. The mean duration of procedure was significantly higher (P<.0001) in D&C group compared to MVA group. The duration of hospital stay was significantly lower (P<.0001) in MVA group compared to D&C group. Similarly the cost of the procedure was significantly lower (P<.0001) in MVA group compared to D&C group.Conclusion: MVA is safe, effective, cheaper, less time consuming and requires shorter hospital stay. It does not require general anaesthesia and complication is also less than dilation and curettage. So it can be easily accessible to the woman of both rural and urban societies belonging to any socioeconomic strata specially where high tech equipments and power supply are not available.Bang Med J (Khulna) 2016; 49 : 18-22


2014 ◽  
Vol 3 (23) ◽  
pp. 6539-6543
Author(s):  
Nupur Hooja ◽  
Nandaram Seervi ◽  
Asha Verma ◽  
Sunita Himani ◽  
Kusum Malviya ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Reema Khajuria ◽  
Arushi Suri ◽  
Rohini Jaggi

Background: Misoprostol use in early pregnancy failure is varied and dose is not well established. Aim of this study was to compare efficacy and side effects of 600 versus 800 micrograms vaginal misoprostol in early pregnancy failure.Methods: A randomized prospective observational study was conducted in the postgraduate department of obstetrics and gynaecology, SMGS hospital Jammu from November 2018 to October 2019 after getting approval from the ethical committee. Hundred patients (50 in group A and 50 in group B) admitted in labour room before 12 weeks of gestation with an ultrasound diagnosis of early fetal demise (missed abortion or brightened ovum) were treated medically with different doses of vaginal misoprostol.Results: The success rate in patients in group A is 72% and group B is 88%, p=0.045 (difference is statistically significant). Patients who required suction and evacuation were 28% in group A and 12% in group B.Conclusions: Use of misoprostol for medical management of 1st trimester missed/anembryonic is an effective, cheap, safe and convenient alternative to surgical evacuation. It was concluded that 800 micrograms vaginal misoprostol is more effective than 600 micrograms vaginal misoprostol. But 800 micrograms misoprostol has more side effects than 600 micrograms vaginal misoprostol.


2014 ◽  
Vol 70 (4) ◽  
pp. 360-363 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nandaram Seervi ◽  
Nupur Hooja ◽  
Lata Rajoria ◽  
Asha Verma ◽  
Kusum Malviya ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 316-319 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ilia Bord ◽  
Michael Gdalevich ◽  
Ravit Nahum ◽  
Simion Meltcer ◽  
Eyal Y. Anteby ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (13) ◽  
pp. 2142-2147
Author(s):  
Alexis C. Gimovsky ◽  
Amelie Pham ◽  
Sindy C. Moreno ◽  
Sara Nicholas ◽  
Amanda Roman ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document