scholarly journals Potential clinically significant drug interactions of drugs with fruit and berry juices

2021 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 44-51
Author(s):  
A.P. Pereverzev ◽  
O.D. Ostroumova

Any drug can potentially cause adverse drug reactions (ADRs), including serious and fatal. Some of them are caused by interactions with food, in particular, fruit and berry juices. Juices have a complex chemical composition and each of the chemicals can interact with drugs. Grapefruit juice is one of the most popular and well-studed in terms of potential drug interactions juices. Grapefruit juice is an inhibitor of CYP3A enzymes in the intestine involved in the presystemic metabolism of drug substrates. Therefore, it can increase their absorption. Apple juice at a concentration of 5% significantly reduces the activity of OATP, but not the activity of P-glycoprotein, which, for example, leads to a decrease in AUC and Cmax of fexofenadine to 30- 40% relative to the concentration of fexofenadine in patients drinking only water. Taking 200 ml of grape juice can reduce the concentration of phenacetin in blood plasma and increase the ratio of AUC of paracetamol to phenacetin due to the induction of CYP1A2 activity by grape juice flavonoids or by reducing the rate of absorption of phenacetin. To prevent ADRs, it is recommended to take drugs with water and and not consume simultaneously juices that are known to interact with drugs.

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (7) ◽  
pp. 1758-1761 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abby C Shumaker ◽  
Heather M Bullard ◽  
Jane Churpek ◽  
Randall W Knoebel

Drug–drug interactions between digoxin and the triazole antifungal agents, mediated via various cytochrome P450 isozymes, have been described in the literature. Posaconazole is not extensively metabolized by these isozymes but is both a p-glycoprotein (P-gp) substrate and inhibitor. To our knowledge, there have been no published cases of clinically significant posaconazole-digoxin drug–drug interactions. We report an interaction between posaconazole (300 mg by mouth daily) and digoxin (0.25 mg by mouth daily, Monday through Friday) resulting in atrial fibrillation with slow ventricular response and degenerating into polymorphic ventricular tachycardia.


2020 ◽  
Vol 26 ◽  
pp. 107602962093632 ◽  
Author(s):  
Érique José F. Peixoto de Miranda ◽  
Thamy Takahashi ◽  
Felipe Iwamoto ◽  
Suzete Yamashiro ◽  
Eliana Samano ◽  
...  

Data on drug–drug interactions (DDI) of antineoplastic drugs with anticoagulants is scarce. We aim to evaluate factors associated with DDI of antineoplastic and supportive care drugs with anticoagulants resulting in modification of pharmacokinetics of these last mentioned. A literature review on DDI databases and summaries of products characteristics (SmPC) was done. Drug–drug interactions of 257 antineoplastic and supportive care drugs with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), warfarin, enoxaparin, or fondaparinux were categorized as no clinically significant expected DDI, potentially weak DDI, potentially clinically significant DDI, and recommendation against coadministration. Logistic regression models were performed to analyze the association between the dependent variable potentially clinically significant interaction/recommendation against coadministration and the mechanisms of DDI. Of the 1799 associations, 84.4% were absence of DDI, 3.6% potentially weak DDI, 10.2% potentially clinically relevant DDI, and 2.0% recommendation against coadministration. Warfarin has higher DDI potential than other anticoagulants. Enoxaparin and fondaparinux have fewer DDI than others. There was no difference between DOACs. Drug–drug interactions with apixaban and rivaroxaban was independently associated with the absence of CYP3A4 competition, P-glycoprotein inhibition, CYP3A4 induction, and drug class of tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Drug–drug interactions with dabigatran and edoxaban was associated with inhibition of P-glycoprotein and tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Warfarin, induction of CYP3A4, and inhibition of CYP2C9. Enoxaparin and fondaparinux, only tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Direct oral anticoagulants did not differ regarding DDI with antineoplastic agents. Warfarin presented more DDI than other anticoagulants. P-glycoprotein inhibition and CYP3A4 induction were independently associated with DDI of antineoplastic agents with DOACs.


2007 ◽  
Vol 96 (10) ◽  
pp. 2808-2817 ◽  
Author(s):  
Whocely Victor de Castro ◽  
Susanne Mertens‐Talcott ◽  
Hartmut Derendorf ◽  
Veronika Butterweck

2008 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
William W. McCloskey ◽  
Kathy Zaiken ◽  
R. Rebecca Couris

2020 ◽  
Vol 75 (12) ◽  
pp. 3417-3424 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine Hodge ◽  
Fiona Marra ◽  
Catia Marzolini ◽  
Alison Boyle ◽  
Sara Gibbons ◽  
...  

Abstract As global health services respond to the coronavirus pandemic, many prescribers are turning to experimental drugs. This review aims to assess the risk of drug–drug interactions in the severely ill COVID-19 patient. Experimental therapies were identified by searching ClinicalTrials.gov for ‘COVID-19’, ‘2019-nCoV’, ‘2019 novel coronavirus’ and ‘SARS-CoV-2’. The last search was performed on 30 June 2020. Herbal medicines, blood-derived products and in vitro studies were excluded. We identified comorbidities by searching PubMed for the MeSH terms ‘COVID-19’, ‘Comorbidity’ and ‘Epidemiological Factors’. Potential drug–drug interactions were evaluated according to known pharmacokinetics, overlapping toxicities and QT risk. Drug–drug interactions were graded GREEN and YELLOW: no clinically significant interaction; AMBER: caution; RED: serious risk. A total of 2378 records were retrieved from ClinicalTrials.gov, which yielded 249 drugs that met inclusion criteria. Thirteen primary compounds were screened against 512 comedications. A full database of these interactions is available at www.covid19-druginteractions.org. Experimental therapies for COVID-19 present a risk of drug–drug interactions, with lopinavir/ritonavir (10% RED, 41% AMBER; mainly a perpetrator of pharmacokinetic interactions but also risk of QT prolongation particularly when given with concomitant drugs that can prolong QT), chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine (both 7% RED and 27% AMBER, victims of some interactions due to metabolic profile but also perpetrators of QT prolongation) posing the greatest risk. With management, these risks can be mitigated. We have published a drug–drug interaction resource to facilitate medication review for the critically ill patient.


Author(s):  
Taiji Miyake ◽  
Haruka Tsutsui ◽  
Kenta Haraya ◽  
Tatsuhiko Tachibana ◽  
Kayoko Morimoto ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document