scholarly journals Custos de Transação e Administração Pública: Análise bibliométrica

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 25
Author(s):  
Guilherme Paulo Andrade ◽  
Júlio César Andrade de Abreu
Keyword(s):  
Public Administration ◽  
Ohio State University ◽  
Florida State University ◽  
State University ◽  
Cornell University ◽  
Public Administration Review ◽  
The Ohio State University

Este artigo tem como objetivo apresentar as características da produção científica sobre custos de transação nas organizações públicas, através de uma análise bibliométrica em artigos publicados de 1970 a 2019. Através do perfil de pesquisa, este estudo identificou que: (i) as décadas de 1990 e 2000 serviram para consolidação teórico-exploratória dos custos de transação nos estudos de administração pública, enquanto a década de 2010-2019 apresentou maior desenvolvimento, com análises aprofundadas; (ii) há um maior volume de publicações em países academicamente consolidados, enquanto que no Brasil o volume de publicações é baixo; (iii) as instituições americanas tem sido as mais produtivas em publicações sobre o assunto, com destaque para Florida State University, Cornell University e The Ohio State University; (iv) não há concentração de publicações por autor, o que reflete o delineamento recente do campo de pesquisa e a capacidade de aplicação multidisciplinar da Nova Economia Institucional; (v) Public Administration Review foi o periódico com mais publicações sobre o assunto; (vi) os mais frequentes tópicos de estudo foram “mecanismos de governança na oferta de serviços públicos”, “estrutura orçamentária-legal das organizações públicas” e “análise do ambiente institucional”. Além disso, o conteúdo encontrado foi discutido de forma ampla, buscando identificar oportunidades de pesquisa para pesquisadores interessados neste campo de pesquisa.  

scholarly journals From “thank god for helping this person” to “libtards really jumped the shark”: Opinion leaders and (in)civility in the wake of school shootings

2019 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
pp. 1004-1025
Author(s):  
Deana A Rohlinger ◽  
Cynthia Williams ◽  
Mackenzie Teek
Keyword(s):  
School Shootings ◽  
Ohio State University ◽  
Opinion Leaders ◽  
Narrative Construction ◽  
Florida State University ◽  
State University ◽  
Quality Of Information ◽  
News Stories ◽  
The Ohio State University

Drawing on a qualitative analysis of 5996 tweets and 480 mainstream news stories about the Florida State University (FSU) and the Ohio State University (OSU) shootings, we examine who emerges as opinion leaders during crises, the kinds of narratives they help construct about school shootings, and the relative civility of these narratives. We find that the opinion leaders who emerge after a crisis are assumed to have local knowledge about the incident and/or are able to quickly curate information about the incident. In addition, we find that the quality of information spread by opinion leaders is critical to narrative construction and civility. The largely fact-based narratives associated with the FSU incident were far more civil than the OSU narratives, which were based on disinformation and polemics. We conclude the article by calling on scholars to take a more nuanced approach to conceptualizing and studying opinion leaders.

scholarly journals From “Thank God for Helping This Person” to “Libtards Really Jumped the Shark”: Opinion Leaders and (in)Civility in the Wake of School Shootings.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deana Rohlinger ◽  
Cynthia Williams ◽  
Mackenzie Teek
Keyword(s):  
School Shootings ◽  
Ohio State University ◽  
Opinion Leaders ◽  
Narrative Construction ◽  
Florida State University ◽  
State University ◽  
Quality Of Information ◽  
News Stories ◽  
The Ohio State University

Drawing on a qualitative analysis of 5996 tweets and 480 mainstream news stories about the Florida State University (FSU) and the Ohio State University (OSU) shootings, we examine who emerges as opinion leaders during crises, the kinds of narratives they help construct about school shootings, and the relative civility of these narratives. We find that the opinion leaders who emerge after a crisis are assumed to have local knowledge about the incident and/or are able to quickly curate information about the incident. In addition, we find that the quality of information spread by opinion leaders is critical to narrative construction and civility. The largely fact-based narratives associated with the FSU incident were far more civil than the OSU narratives, which were based on disinformation and polemics. We conclude the article by calling on scholars to take a more nuanced approach to conceptualizing and studying opinion leaders.

Five Decades of Research Experience in Speech Anatomy and Physiology

2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (5) ◽  
pp. 4-12
Author(s):  
David P. Kuehn
Keyword(s):  
Ohio State University ◽  
State University ◽  
Research Experience ◽  
University Of Iowa ◽  
University Of Illinois ◽  
Anatomy And Physiology ◽  
The Ohio State University ◽  
Speech Science ◽  
The University ◽  
East Carolina University

This report highlights some of the major developments in the area of speech anatomy and physiology drawing from the author's own research experience during his years at the University of Iowa and the University of Illinois. He has benefited greatly from mentors including Professors James Curtis, Kenneth Moll, and Hughlett Morris at the University of Iowa and Professor Paul Lauterbur at the University of Illinois. Many colleagues have contributed to the author's work, especially Professors Jerald Moon at the University of Iowa, Bradley Sutton at the University of Illinois, Jamie Perry at East Carolina University, and Youkyung Bae at the Ohio State University. The strength of these researchers and their students bodes well for future advances in knowledge in this important area of speech science.

Cardiology Fellowship Education in the Era of High-density Training, Data Tracking, and Quality Measures

2011 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 99
Author(s):  
Alex J Auseon ◽  
Albert J Kolibash ◽  
◽  
Keyword(s):  
Ohio State University ◽  
Training Data ◽  
State University ◽  
Training Requirements ◽  
Healthcare Environment ◽  
Medical Centers ◽  
Work Hour ◽  
The Ohio State University ◽  
Data Tracking

Background:Educating trainees during cardiology fellowship is a process in constant evolution, with program directors regularly adapting to increasing demands and regulations as they strive to prepare graduates for practice in today’s healthcare environment.Methods and Results:In a 10-year follow-up to a previous manuscript regarding fellowship education, we reviewed the literature regarding the most topical issues facing training programs in 2010, describing our approach at The Ohio State University.Conclusion:In the midst of challenges posed by the increasing complexity of training requirements and documentation, work hour restrictions, and the new definitions of quality and safety, we propose methods of curricula revision and collaboration that may serve as an example to other medical centers.

Evaluation of a New Clinical Test of Fusion Status: A Pilot Study

2019 ◽  
pp. 113-118
Keyword(s):  
Pilot Study ◽  
Ohio State University ◽  
Background Suppression ◽  
Clinical Test ◽  
State University ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Central Fusion ◽  
Eye Examination ◽  
The Ohio State University ◽  
Chi Square Analysis

Background Suppression is associated with binocular vision conditions such as amblyopia and strabismus. Commercial methods of testing fusion often only measure central fusion or suppression at near. The purpose of this pilot study was to assess a new iPad picture fusion test that assesses foveal and central fusion at near. Methods Participants aged 5 years and older presenting for eye examination at The Ohio State University College of Optometry were enrolled. Results from visual acuity, dry and wet refraction/retinoscopy, stereopsis and cover testing were recorded from the patient chart. The iPad picture fusion test, Worth four-dot, Worth type test with foveal letter targets, and Polarized four-dot were performed by one examiner in a randomized order at 40 cm. Testing was repeated with the anaglyphic filters reversed. Crosstabulation and McNemar chi-square analysis were used to compare the results between fusion testing devices. Results Of the fifty participants (mean age = 17.5), twelve reported suppression and one reported diplopia. Testability was excellent for all tests (98% to 100%). There were no significant differences between tests in reported results (P ≥ 0.22 for all comparisons). No difference in reported fusion or suppression status was observed with change in orientation of the anaglyphic filters. Six participants reported foveal suppression alone at near which was not identified with Worth four-dot at near. Conclusion The iPad picture fusion test provided excellent testability and agreement with commonly used tests of fusion and allowed testing of both central and foveal fusion at near. Nearly half (46%) of participants with suppression reported foveal suppression, supporting the importance of testing for foveal suppression.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document