Vision screening for all stroke survivors would identify many who need support

2021 ◽  
BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (9) ◽  
pp. e029578
Author(s):  
Fiona J Rowe ◽  
Lauren R Hepworth ◽  
Jamie J Kirkham

ObjectivesVisual impairment following stroke is common with a reported incidence of visual impairment in 60% of stroke survivors. Screening for visual impairment is neither routine nor standardised. This results in a health inequality where some stroke survivors receive comprehensive vision assessment to identify any existent visual problems while others receive no vision assessment leaving them with unmet needs from undiagnosed visual problems. The aim of this study was to define two core outcome sets (COS), one for vision screening and one for full visual assessment of stroke survivors.DesignA list of potentially relevant visual assessments was created from a review of the literature. The consensus process consisted of an online 3-round Delphi survey followed by a consensus meeting of the key stakeholders.ParticipantsStakeholders included orthoptists, occupational therapists, ophthalmologists, stroke survivors and COS users such as researchers, journal editors and guideline developers.SettingUniversity.Outcome measuresCOS.ResultsFollowing the consensus process we recommend the following nine assessments for vision screening: case history, clinical observations of visual signs, visual acuity, eye alignment position, eye movement assessment, visual field assessment, visual neglect assessment, functional vision assessment and reading assessment. We recommend the following 11 assessments for full vision assessment: case history, observations, visual acuity, eye alignment position, eye movement assessment, binocular vision assessment, eye position measurement, visual field assessment, visual neglect assessment, functional vision assessment, reading assessment and quality of life questionnaires.ConclusionsCOS are defined for vision screening and full vision assessment for stroke survivors. There is potential for their use in reducing heterogeneity in routine clinical practice and for improving standardisation and accuracy of vision assessment. Future research is required to evaluate the use of these COS and for further exploration of core outcome measures.


2005 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. J. McGruder ◽  
◽  
K. J. Greenlund ◽  
J. B. Croft ◽  
Z. J. Zheng

2001 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruth E. Herman ◽  
Susan Kemper ◽  
Joan M. McDowd
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Klaus Pfeiffer ◽  
Denis Beische ◽  
R. Hoffrichter ◽  
J. Wengert ◽  
C. Becker ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 39 (9) ◽  
pp. 6
Author(s):  
BARBARA J. HOWARD
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document