scholarly journals Croatia’s First Experiences in Cytological Diagnosis of High-Grade Ductal Carcinoma in Situ of the Breast: Case Reports and a Review of Literature

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Ductal Carcinoma In Situ ◽  
Carcinoma In Situ ◽  
Ductal Carcinoma ◽  
Case Reports ◽  
Nipple Discharge ◽  
Left Breast ◽  
Cytological Diagnosis ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Morphological Criteria

Cases here presented are also first Croatia’s experiences in the cytological diagnosis of breast ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). The first patient was a 64-year-old woman, by imaging methods with a wide area of suspect microcalcifications in the left breast lower medial quadrant and abundant, dense, yellow-greyish discharge of the same mammilla and second was a 65-year-old woman with an equivocal lesion in left breast lower lateral quadrant. Morphological findings of both aspirates and nipple discharge from the first patient were practically the same - moderately to highly cellular, with 3D solid aggregates, monolayer sheets and many scattered single clearly malignant cells of large - mainly >5x the diameter of an erythrocyte, round-to-ovaloid, manifestly irregular nuclei, dark blue, polymorphous, often multiple (macro)nucleoli, irregular nuclear outlines and dense, more basophilic, mostly scant cytoplasms arranged in syncytium–like structures. “Dirty” background was overfull of comedo necrosis and dark grayish, sharp, irregular microcalcifications. Cytological diagnosis in both cases was DCIS, high-grade, comedo type. Histopathologically first tumor was big, 6 cm large, estimated as comedo carcinoma with microinvasion focuses not bigger than 1 mm, but without signs of angioinvasion, while the second tumor was smaller, 0.6 cm with wide ducts fully with large polymorphic malignant epithelial cells, central comedo necrosis, cancerisation of some lobules but with the intact basement membrane. It was pure high-grade DCIS, comedo type. Presented cases completely reflect to date knowledge about cytological diagnostic of high-grade DCIS; include necessary morphological criteria - highgrade nuclear atypia, an abundance of comedo necrosis and microcalcifications, confirm our limitation in the presumption of invasion status with large lesion extent, but also prove that cytology is the unquestionably reliable in breast morphological diagnostic, even in such sophisticated and demanding pathological issue like DCIS.

scholarly journals Ductal Carcinoma In situ of the Male Breast

Breast Care ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 288-290 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melissa Brents ◽  
John Hancock
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Ductal Carcinoma In Situ ◽  
Carcinoma In Situ ◽  
Ductal Carcinoma ◽  
Histological Grade ◽  
Nipple Discharge ◽  
Left Breast ◽  
Male Breast ◽  
High Grade

Background: Ductal carcinoma in situ of the male breast is an unusual lesion and most often associated with invasive carcinoma. On rare occasions when the in situ component is present in pure form, histological grade is almost always low to intermediate. Imaging for these patients is difficult as gynecomastia is often present and can mask underlying calcifications or carcinoma. Case Report: We report a case of pure high-grade ductal carcinoma in situ of the male breast in a patient with clear nipple discharge. Breast mammography showed bilateral gynecomastia and benign calcifications. Subsequent breast ultrasound showed dilated ducts of the left breast, and a left breast ductogram showed filling defects suggestive of a papilloma. Excisional biopsy and subsequent mastectomy were consistent with high-grade ductal carcinoma in situ. Conclusion: Male breast cancer is uncommon and, although there is increasing awareness, it is less studied compared to female breast cancer. With a clinical history of nipple discharge of any kind, further evaluation with imaging should be considered. In males with gynecomastia, it is important to remember that ductal carcinoma in situ, even of high grade, is difficult to detect on mammography and may not be associated with suspicious calcifications.

scholarly journals Patterns of invasive recurrence among patients originally treated for ductal carcinoma in situ by breast-conserving surgery versus mastectomy

2021 ◽  
Vol 186 (3) ◽  
pp. 617-624
Author(s):  
Kate R. Pawloski ◽  
Audree B. Tadros ◽  
Varadan Sevilimedu ◽  
Ashley Newman ◽  
Lori Gentile ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ductal Carcinoma In Situ ◽  
Carcinoma In Situ ◽  
Ductal Carcinoma ◽  
Advanced Disease ◽  
Breast Conserving Surgery ◽  
Risk Profile ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Group A ◽  
First Recurrence

Abstract Purpose Local recurrence after treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) with breast-conserving surgery (BCS) is more common than after mastectomy, but it is unclear if patterns of invasive recurrence vary by initial surgical therapy. Among patients with invasive recurrence after treatment for DCIS, we compared patterns of first recurrence between those originally treated with BCS vs. mastectomy. Methods From 2000 to 2016, women with an invasive recurrence occurring ≥ 6 months after initial treatment for DCIS were retrospectively identified. Clinicopathologic features and adjuvant treatment of the initial DCIS, as well as characteristics of first invasive recurrences, were compared between patients who had undergone BCS vs. mastectomy. Results 452 patients with an invasive recurrence after surgery for DCIS were identified: 367 patients (81%) had initially undergone BCS and 85 patients (19%) mastectomy. Patients originally treated with mastectomy were younger and were more likely to have had high grade, necrosis, and multifocal or multicentric DCIS (p < 0.001) compared with the BCS group. A higher proportion of invasive recurrences were local after BCS (93%; 343/367), whereas 88% (75/85) of recurrences after mastectomy were regional or distant (p < 0.001). The median time to first invasive recurrence was not different between surgical groups (BCS: 6.4 years vs. mastectomy: 5.5 years; p = 0.12). Conclusions Among women who experienced a first invasive recurrence after treatment for DCIS, those who had originally undergone mastectomy more commonly presented with advanced disease compared to those treated with BCS, likely related to the absence of the breast and the higher risk profile of their initial DCIS.

Immunostaining of ∆Np63 (using the p40 antibody) is equal to that of p63 and CK5/6 in high-grade ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast

2015 ◽  
Vol 467 (1) ◽  
pp. 67-70 ◽  
Author(s):  
Verena Sailer ◽  
Christine Lüders ◽  
Walther Kuhn ◽  
Volker Pelzer ◽  
Glen Kristiansen
Keyword(s):  
Ductal Carcinoma In Situ ◽  
Carcinoma In Situ ◽  
Ductal Carcinoma ◽  
High Grade

scholarly journals High-grade ductal carcinoma in-situ detected by microcalcification within borderline phyllodes tumour: A report of a case and literature review

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wing Nam Yuen ◽  
Joshua Jing Xi Li ◽  
Man Yi Chan ◽  
Gary M Tse
Keyword(s):  
Ductal Carcinoma In Situ ◽  
Carcinoma In Situ ◽  
Ductal Carcinoma ◽  
Surgical Excision ◽  
Management Plan ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Total Mastectomy ◽  
Phyllodes Tumour ◽  
Phyllodes Tumours

Abstract BackgroundPhyllodes tumour is a rare biphasic neoplasm of the breast that mostly affects middle aged women. Ductal carcinoma in-situ and microcalcifications occurring within phyllodes tumours are documented but are rare findings. Primary surgical excision with adjuvant therapies remains the mainstay of treatment.Case presentationWe report a case of a 42-year-old woman with high-grade ductal carcinoma in-situ within a borderline phyllodes tumour. Radiologically, clumps of microcalcification were detected within the lesion. Local excision followed by total mastectomy with axillary dissection was then performed. No tumour recurrence was detected up to a period of 8 years.ConclusionPresence of microcalcifications within a phyllodes tumour should alert clinicians and pathologists of possible coexisting carcinoma components. Stromal and epithelial components of these lesions should be evaluated separately when formulating a management plan.

scholarly journals Stereotactic Vacuum-Assisted Breast Biopsy in Ductal Carcinoma in situ: Residual Microcalcifications and Intraoperative Findings

Breast Care ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 386-391
Author(s):  
Benedict Krischer ◽  
Serafino Forte ◽  
Gad Singer ◽  
Rahel A. Kubik-Huch ◽  
Cornelia Leo
Keyword(s):  
Ductal Carcinoma In Situ ◽  
Carcinoma In Situ ◽  
Ductal Carcinoma ◽  
Significant Proportion ◽  
Invasive Cancer ◽  
Histopathological Diagnosis ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Surgical Specimen

Purpose: The question of overtreatment of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) was raised because a significant proportion of especially low-grade DCIS lesions never progress to invasive cancer. The rationale for the present study was to analyze the value of stereotactic vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB) for complete removal of DCIS, focusing on the relationship between the absence of residual microcalcifications after stereotactic VAB and the histopathological diagnosis of the definitive surgical specimen. Patients and Methods: Data of 58 consecutive patients diagnosed with DCIS by stereotactic VAB in a single breast center between 2012 and 2017 were analyzed. Patient records from the hospital information system were retrieved, and mammogram reports and images as well as histopathology reports were evaluated. The extent of microcalcifications before and after biopsy as well as the occurrence of DCIS in biopsy and definitive surgical specimens were analyzed and correlated. Results: There was no correlation between the absence of residual microcalcifications in the post-biopsy mammogram and the absence of residual DCIS in the final surgical specimen (p = 0.085). Upstaging to invasive cancer was recorded in 4 cases (13%) but occurred only in the group that had high-grade DCIS on biopsy. Low-grade DCIS was never upgraded to high-grade DCIS in the definitive specimen. Conclusions: The radiological absence of microcalcifications after stereotactic biopsy does not rule out residual DCIS in the final surgical specimen. Since upstaging to invasive cancer is seen in a substantial proportion of high-grade DCIS, the surgical excision of high-grade DCIS should remain the treatment of choice.

Genomic alterations and phenotype of large compared to small high-grade ductal carcinoma in situ

2011 ◽  
Vol 42 (10) ◽  
pp. 1467-1475 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Shelley Hwang ◽  
Aseem Lal ◽  
Yunn-Yi Chen ◽  
Sandy DeVries ◽  
Rebecca Swain ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ductal Carcinoma In Situ ◽  
Carcinoma In Situ ◽  
Ductal Carcinoma ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Genomic Alterations
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document