AbstractRevascularization surgery is considered a standard treatment for preventing additional stroke in symptomatic moyamoya disease (MMD). In hemodynamically stable, and asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic patients, however, the treatment strategy is controversial because of the obscure natural course of them. The authors analyzed the benefits and risks of antiplatelet medication in those patients. Medical data were retrospectively reviewed in 439 hemispheres of 243 patients with stable hemodynamic status. Overall, 121 patients (49.8%) with 222 studied hemispheres (50.6%) took antiplatelet medication. Symptomatic cerebral infarction and hemorrhage occurred in 10 (2.3%) and 30 (6.8%) hemispheres, over a mean follow-up of 62.0 ± 43.4 months (range 6–218 months). The use of antiplatelet agents was statistically insignificant in terms of symptomatic infarction, hemorrhage and improvement of ischemic symptoms. In subgroup analyses within the antiplatelet group according to drug potency and duration of medication, a longer duration of antiplatelet medication significantly improved ischemic symptoms (adjusted OR 1.02; 95% CI 1.01–1.03; p = 0.006). Antiplatelet medication failed to prevent symptomatic cerebral infarction or improve ischemic symptoms. However, antiplatelet therapy did not increase the risk of cerebral hemorrhage.
Rapid Progression of Cerebral Infarction after Intraventricular Hemorrhage in Adult Moyamoya Disease
