scholarly journals Statistical quality control to emission uniformity in micro sprinkler with autonomous photovoltaic pumping

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. e581101119867
Author(s):  
Soni Willian Haupenthal ◽  
Marcio Antonio Vilas Boas ◽  
Jair Antonio Cruz Siqueira ◽  
Luciene Kazue Tokura ◽  
Lais Fernanda Juchem do Nascimento

This work aimed to evaluate a microsprinkler irrigation system using photovoltaic energy without energy storage. The influence of photovoltaic pumping on irrigation was evaluated from the Emission Uniformity, Shewhart control charts and Process Capacity. The experiment consisted of two amorphous photovoltaic panels connected in parallel, directly connected to a water pump, where the flow of the pumping system was carried out through a ½” tube (main line), to the irrigation system composed of four microsprinklers. The voltage and current parameters were collected, and the power of the photovoltaic system was calculated, while for the irrigation system the pressures of the four microsprinklers were measured to later calculate the flow rate of the irrigation system. The experiment was conducted at the State University of Western Paraná, UNIOESTE, where 25 days of collection were carried out, in the open, at four different times, from 10:00 am to 11:00 am, from 11:05 am to 12:05 pm, from 2:00 pm to 3:00 pm and from 3:05 pm to 4:05 pm . Power generation presented a low coefficient of variation throughout the day, which resulted in flow and pressure stability, culminating in an Emission Uniformity (UE) value qualified as excellent (93.66%) according to the ASAE. The values of energy generation, flow, pressure, and emission uniformity presented a Process Capacity (CP) value above 1.33, defining the process as capable and adequate throughout the analyzed period.

Author(s):  
Allan Remor Lopes ◽  
Marcio Antonio Vilas Boas ◽  
Felix Augusto Pazuch ◽  
Diane Aparecida Ostroski ◽  
Marta Juliana Schmatz

This study monitored a drip irrigation system with different hydraulic heads, using control charts. The study included 25 tests, and was conducted at the Experimental Nucleus of Agricultural Engineering of the State University of Western Paraná, located in the municipality of Cascavel, Paraná. The drip irrigation system was operated by gravity, and had four hydraulic heads (10, 11, 12 and 15 kPa). The uniformity of the system was determined based on uniformity distribution. Uniformity monitoring was performed using Shewhart and exponentially weighted moving-average (EWMA) control charts. An increase in the hydraulic head increased uniformity. The use of 12 and 15 kPa hydraulic heads yielded good performance, whereas 10 and 11 kPa yielded regular performance. The use of control charts proved to be efficient; the Shewhart control chart was more robust, whereas the EWMA control chart, which indicated trends and deviations not shown by Shewhart control charts, was more sensitive.


2017 ◽  
Vol 47 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Maurício Guy de Andrade ◽  
Marcio Antonio Vilas Boas ◽  
Jair Antonio Cruz Siqueira ◽  
Mireille Sato ◽  
Jonathan Dieter ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT: The objective of this study was to evaluate the use of statistical quality control tools in the analysis of the uniformity of a microsprinkler irrigation system. For the analysis of irrigation Christiansen uniformity coefficient (CUC) and the distribution uniformity coefficient (DU) were statistically analyzed by means of the Shewhart control charts and process capability index (Cp). For the experiment 25 tests were carried out with a single micro sprinkler and subsequently seven different spacing between micro sprinklers were simulated. Control charts contributed to the diagnosis of the treatments to be under control and with satisfactory uniformity outcomes. Increase in process capability index was directly proportional to the average of CUC and DU.


Irriga ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (01) ◽  
pp. 56 ◽  
Author(s):  
JIAM PIRES FRIGO ◽  
MARCIO ANTONIO VILAS BOAS ◽  
JIANICE PIRES FRIGO ◽  
ELISANDRO PIRES FRIGO

COMPARAÇÃO ENTRE GRÁFICOS DE CONTROLE DE SHEWHART, CUSUM E MMEP NO PROCESSO DE IRRIGAÇÃO POR ASPERSÃO CONVENCIONAL  JIAM PIRES FRIGO1; MARCIO ANTONIO VILAS BOAS2; JIANICE PIRES FRIGO2 E ELISANDRO PIRES FRIGO3 1 Instituto Latino-Americano de Tecnologia, Infraestrutura e Território - ILATIT (UNILA), Av. Tancredo Neves, 3838 - Porto Belo, CEP 85867-970, Foz do Iguaçu, PR, Fone (45)99993 4783, e‑mail:[email protected] Centro de Ciências Exatas e Tecnológicas, Programa de Pós Graduação em Engenharia Agrícola (Unioeste), R. Universitária, 2069 - Jardim Universitário CEP 85819-110, Cascavel-PR3 Universidade Federal do Paraná, Campus Palotina  R. Pioneiro, 2153 - Dallas, CEP 85950-000, Palotina-PR  1 RESUMO O objetivo deste estudo foi comparar os resultados da utilização dos gráficos de controle de Shewhart para medidas individuais, com os gráficos de controle média móvel exponencialmente ponderada (MMEP) e soma cumulativa (CUSUM), aplicados no controle de qualidade da irrigação. Foram realizados 60 ensaios de irrigação em um sistema por aspersão convencional. As análises do processo de controle de qualidade do sistema de irrigação foram realizadas por meio dos gráficos de Shewhart (Xbarra), gráficos MMEP e CUSUM. Todos os procedimentos para os ensaios de uniformidade da irrigação foram realizados conforme recomendação NBR ISO 7749-2 (ABNT, 2000). Para a avaliação do sistema foi utilizado o Coeficiente de Uniformidade de Christiansen (CUC). O gráfico de controle MMEP apresentou-se bastante suscetível quando utilizado em dados auto correlacionados, com ocorrências de alarmes falsos. Para dados independentes (pelo modelo ARIMA), o gráfico CUSUM foi mais sensível ao detectar as variações ocorridas na irrigação devido à velocidade do vento, quando comparado aos gráficos MMEP e Shewhart para os mesmos dados. Na irrigação por aspersão, relacionando CUC com velocidade do vento, o gráfico de Shewhart foi mais indicado pela simplicidade, robustez e facilidade de interpretação, mesmo na presença de dados que violam a suposição de independência. Os gráficos de controle de Shewhart, MMEP e CUSUM provaram serem ótimas ferramentas estatísticas no estudo da irrigação por aspersão convencional, demonstrando muito bem a variabilidade no processo. Palavras-Chave: água, vento, Coeficiente de Christiansen, Controle de qualidade.  FRIGO, J.P.; VILAS BOAS, M.A.; FRIGO, J.P.; FRIGO, E.P.COMPARISON BETWEEN SHEWHART CONTROL CHARTS, CUSUM AND MMEP IN PROCESS OF CONVENTIONAL IRRIGATION SPRINKLER  2 ABSTRACT This study aimed to compare the results of Shewhart control charts use for individual measures with exponentially weighted moving average (MMEP) and cumulative sum (CUSUM) control charts applied in quality control of conventional sprinkler irrigation. Sixty irrigation trials were set up in a conventional sprinkler system. The analyses of the quality control process of the irrigation system were performed by means of Shewhart charts (Xbarra) charts, MMEP and CUSUM. All procedures for testing uniformity of irrigation were performed as recommended by ISO 7749-2 (ABNT, 2000). For the evaluation of the system, it was used Christiansen Uniformity Coefficient (CUC). The control chart MMEP showed to be quite susceptible when used in auto correlated data with instances of false alarms. For independent data (the ARIMA model), the CUSUM tabular chart was more sensitive to detect variations in irrigation due to wind speed, when compared to MMEP and Shewhart charts for the same data. In sprinkler irrigation, relating CUC with wind speed, the Shewhart chart was better due to such features as simplicity, robustness and easiness of interpretation, even in the presence of data that violate the assumption of independence. The Shewhart control charts, CUSUM and MMEP statistics proved to be great tools in the study of irrigation sprinkler, demonstrating very well the variability in the process. Keywords: water, wind, Christiansen coefficient, control charts, Quality control.


2014 ◽  
Vol 31 (8) ◽  
pp. 1565-1574 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alireza Faraz ◽  
Erwin M. Saniga ◽  
Cedric Heuchenne

2021 ◽  
Vol 69 ◽  
pp. 273-289
Author(s):  
Kim Duc Tran ◽  
Qurat-Ul-Ain Khaliq ◽  
Adel Ahmadi Nadi ◽  
Thi Hien Nguyen ◽  
Kim Phuc Tran

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document