Quality Control of Medical Imaging

2004 ◽  
Vol 50 (5) ◽  
pp. 317 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joon Il Choi ◽  
Dong Gyu Na ◽  
Hak Hee Kim ◽  
Yong Moon Shin ◽  
Kook Jin Ahn ◽  
...  
2001 ◽  
Vol 28 (8) ◽  
pp. 1813-1813 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. G. Haus ◽  
Lawrence N. Rothenberg

2015 ◽  
Vol 71 (4) ◽  
pp. 356-361 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takayuki Shibutani ◽  
Tsuyoshi Setojima ◽  
Katsumi Ueda ◽  
Katsumi Takada ◽  
Teiichi Okuno ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
pp. 1297-1308
Author(s):  
Alisa Walz-Flannigan ◽  
Heather Weber

1995 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 10-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
David M. Parsons ◽  
Yongmin Kim ◽  
David R. Haynor

2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (1) ◽  
pp. 22-28
Author(s):  
Lesley Buckley ◽  
Gary Heddon ◽  
Ian Byrne ◽  
Crystal Angers

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fujiao He ◽  
Yaqin Wang ◽  
Yun Xiu ◽  
Yixin Zhang ◽  
Lizhu Chen

The application of artificial intelligence (AI) technology to medical imaging has resulted in great breakthroughs. Given the unique position of ultrasound (US) in prenatal screening, the research on AI in prenatal US has practical significance with its application to prenatal US diagnosis improving work efficiency, providing quantitative assessments, standardizing measurements, improving diagnostic accuracy, and automating image quality control. This review provides an overview of recent studies that have applied AI technology to prenatal US diagnosis and explains the challenges encountered in these applications.


Author(s):  
Mohamed Mejri ◽  
Aymen Mejri ◽  
Maiza Bekara

Seismic imaging is the main technology used for subsurface hydrocarbon prospection. It provides an image of the subsurface using the same principles as ultrasound medical imaging. It is based on emitting a sound (pressure) wave through the subsurface and recording the reflected echoes using hydrophones (pressure sensors) and/or geophones (velocity/acceleration sensors). Contrary to medical imaging, which is done in real time, subsurface seismic imaging is an offline process that involves a huge volume of data and needs considerable computing power. The raw seismic data are heavily contaminated with noise and unwanted reflections that need to be removed before further processing. Therefore, the noise attenuation is done at an early stage and often while acquiring the data. Quality control (QC) is mandatory to give confidence in the denoising process and to ensure that a costly data re-acquisition is not needed. QC is done manually by humans and comprises a major portion of the cost of a typical seismic processing project. It is therefore advantageous to automate this process to improve cost and efficiency. Here, we propose a supervised learning approach to build an automatic QC system. The QC system is an attribute-based classifier that is trained to classify three types of filtering (mild = underfiltering, noise remaining in the data; optimal = good filtering; harsh = overfiltering, the signal is distorted). The attributes are computed from the data and represent geophysical and statistical measures of the quality of the filtering. The system is tested on a full-scale survey (9000 km2) to QC the results of the swell noise attenuation process in marine seismic data. The results are encouraging and helped identify localized issues that were difficult for a human to spot.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document