Improved X-Ray Safety, Quality Control, and Resource Management in Medical Imaging Using QATrack+

2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (1) ◽  
pp. 22-28
Author(s):  
Lesley Buckley ◽  
Gary Heddon ◽  
Ian Byrne ◽  
Crystal Angers
2004 ◽  
Vol 50 (5) ◽  
pp. 317 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joon Il Choi ◽  
Dong Gyu Na ◽  
Hak Hee Kim ◽  
Yong Moon Shin ◽  
Kook Jin Ahn ◽  
...  

1983 ◽  
Vol 17 (5) ◽  
pp. 175-177
Author(s):  
N. N. Blinov ◽  
G. D. Gromov ◽  
N. M. Kuskova ◽  
T. A. Popova ◽  
V. V. Popov

2011 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 70 ◽  
Author(s):  
Geoffrey K Korir ◽  
Jeska Sidika Wambani ◽  
Ian K Korir

Background. The wide use of ionising radiation in medical care has resulted in the largest man-made cause of radiation exposure. In recent years, diagnostic departments in Kenya have adapted the high-speed film/screen combination without well-established quality control, objective image quality criteria, and assessment of patient dose. The safety of patients in terms of justification and the as-low-as-reasonably-achievable (ALARA) principle is inadequate without quality assurance measures. Aim. This study assessed the level of film rejects, device performance, image quality and patient dose in 4 representative hospitals using high-speed film/screen combination. Results. The X-ray equipment quality control tests performance range was 67% to 90%, and 63% of the radiographs were of good diagnostic value. The measured prevalent chest examination entrance surface dose (ESD) showed levels above the international diagnostic reference levels (DRLs), while lumbar spine and pelvis examination was the largest source of radiation exposure to patients. Conclusion. The optimisation of patient protection can be achieved with optimally performing X-ray equipment, the application of good radiographic technique, and continuous assessment of radiographic image quality.


Author(s):  
S. Svanberg ◽  
M. Grätz ◽  
K. Herrlin ◽  
I. Mercer ◽  
A. Persson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Minerals ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
pp. 1253
Author(s):  
Uwe König ◽  
Sabine M. C. Verryn

Heavy mineral sands are the source of various commodities such as white titanium dioxide pigment and titanium metal. The three case studies in this paper show the value of X-ray diffraction (XRD) and statistical methods such as data clustering for process optimization and quality control during heavy mineral processing. The potential of XRD as an automatable, reliable tool, useful in the characterization of heavy mineral concentrates, product streams and titania slag is demonstrated. The recent development of ultra-high-speed X-ray detectors and automated quantification allows for ‘on the fly’ quantitative X-ray diffraction analysis and truly interactive process control, especially in the sector of heavy mineral concentration and processing. Apart from the information about the composition of a raw ore, heavy mineral concentrate and the various product streams or titania slag, this paper provides useful information by the quantitative determination of the crystalline phases and the amorphous content. The analysis of the phases can help to optimize the concentration of ores and reduction of ilmenite concentrate. Traditionally, quality control of heavy mineral concentrates and titania slag relies mainly on elemental, chemical, gravimetrical, and magnetic analysis. Since the efficiency of concentration of minerals in the different product streams and reduction depends on the content of the different minerals, and for the latter on the titanium and iron phases such as ilmenite FeTiO3, rutile TiO2, anatase TiO2, or the various titanium oxides with different oxidation stages, fast and direct analysis of the phases is required.


Author(s):  
Oladotun A. Ojo ◽  
Peter A. Oluwafisoye ◽  
Charles O. Chime

The sensitivity of radiographic films is an important factor to the clarity and accuracy of X-ray exposure to patients during treatment or diagnostic periods. It is therefore important to do a thorough analysis of the sensitivity of the radiographic film before and after exposure to enhance the Quality Assurance (QA) and the Quality Control (QC), of the exposure procedures. The optical densities (OD) of each film was measured, with a densitometer model MA 5336, made by GAMMEX. These values were then converted to the absorbed dose (X mGy), which is the amount of dose absorbed by each patient. The optical density versus the dose curve, followed the expected pattern, showing a good prediction from the General model, that the films employed in the exposures were of good quality and standard. Hence the optical density versus dose sensitometric curves depicts the outcome of the various films sensitivity after an exposure to the X-ray radiation through the patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document